Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T07:31:40.887Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The European Risk Forum Action Plan: A critical perspective

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Jacopo Torriti*
Affiliation:
University of Reading

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Reports
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2013

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 The ERF Action Plan is available at <http://www.riskforum.eu/pdf/2012/ERF_ActionPlan_Nov12_F3_HI-RES.pdf> (last accessed on 14 May 2013).

2 Torriti, Jacopo and Löfstedt, Ragnar, “The first five years of the EU Impact Assessment system: a risk economics perspective on gaps between rationale and practice”, 15(2) Journal of Risk Research, (2012), pp. 169186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

3 Adelle, Camilla, Jordan, Andrew and Turnpenny, Jon, “Proceeding in parallel or drifting apart? A systematic review of policy appraisal research and practices”, 30(3) Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy (2012), pp. 401415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

4 Jasanoff, Sheila, Designs on Nature: Science and Democracy in Europe and the United States (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2007).Google Scholar

5 Horlick–Jones, Tom, “The problem of blame”, in Hood, Christopher and Jones, David K.C. (eds), Accident and design: Contemporary debates in risk management (Oxon: Routledge, 1996), pp. 3437 Google Scholar. Stirling, Andy, “‘Opening Up’ and ‘Closing Down’ Power, Participation, and Pluralism in the Social Appraisal of Technology”, 33(2) Science, Technology & Human Values (2008), pp. 262294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar