Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T08:19:27.055Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Co-Regulatory Failure in the Food Industry

Explaining Regulatory Failure by Means of Two Contrasting Interpretations of Governance

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Haiko van der Voort
Haiko van der Voort*
Affiliation:
Delft University of Technology
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Co-regulation presents an odd paradox in today's context of a shifting emphasis from government to governance. In the first place, co-regulation implies horizontal, ‘networked’ relations between government and industry. Yet at the same time, it has the hierarchical connotation inherent in regulation. The main concern addressed in this paper is what this ambiguity means for evaluations of co-regulation. What is failure here? Two contrasting interpretations of ‘governance’ are described, and a case study from the Dutch poultry sector is presented to seek explanations for failure. The two interpretations are found to provide complementary explanations for failure. This suggests that evaluations adopting a single perspective may produce all-too-easy – though misleading – conclusions.

Type
Special Issue on the Patterns of Interplay between Public and Private Food Regulation
Information
European Journal of Risk Regulation , Volume 6 , Issue 4 , December 2015 , pp. 502 - 511
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2015

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 van der Heijden, Jeroen, Building Regulatory Enforcement Regimes; Comparative Analysis of Private Sector Involvement in the Enforcement of Public building Regulations (Amsterdam: IOS Press, 2009), at p. 64–71 Google Scholar; Börzel, Tanja A. and Risse, Thomas, “Governance without a State: Can it Work”, 4 Regulation & Governance (2010), pp. 113–134 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

2 Parker, Christine and Nielsen, Vibeke L., “The Challenge of Empirical Research on Business Compliance in Regulatory Capitalism”, 5 Annual Review of Law and Social Sciences (2009), pp. 45–70 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

3 Dorbeck-Jung, Bärbel R., Oude Vrielink, Mirjan J., Gosselt, Jordy F., van Hoof, Joris J. and de Jong, Menno D.T., “Contested Hybridization of Regulation: Failure of the Dutch Regulatory System to Protect Minors from Harmful Media”, 4 Regulation & Governance (2010), pp. 154–174 CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Sharma, Lisa L., Teret, Stephen P., and Brownell, Kelly D., “The Food Industry and Self-Regulation: Standards to Promote Success and to Avoid Public Health Failures”, 100 American Journal of Public Health, (2010), pp. 240–246 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed.

4 Guy Peters, B. and Pierre, John “Governance without Government? Rethinking Public Administration”, 8 Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory (1998), pp. 223–243 CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Hysing, Erik, “From Government to Governance? A Comparison of Environmental governing in Swedish Forestry and Transport”, 22 Governance: An International Journal of Policy, Administration, and Institutions (2009), pp. 647–672 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

5 Hysing (2009); Laurence Lynn jr, “Adaptation? Transformation? Both? Neither? The Many Faces of Governance”, 20 Jerusalem Papers in Regulation & Governance (2010).

6 Börzel, T.A. en T. Risse (2010).

7 Mayntz, Renate, “New Challenges to Governance Theory”, in Bang, Henrik P. (ed.), Governance as Political and Social Communication (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2003), at p. 31 Google Scholar.

8 Rhodes, Roderick A.W., “From Marketisation to Diplomacy: It’s the Mix that Matters”, 56 Australian Journal of Public Administration (1993), pp. 40–53 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

9 Bruijn, Hans de and Heuvelhof, Ernst ten, Management in Networks; On Multi-Actor Decision Making (London: Routledge, 2008)Google Scholar.

10 Levine, Michael E. and Forrence, Jennifer L., “Regulatory Capture, Public Interest, and the Public Agenda: Toward a Synthesis” 6 Journal of Law, Economics, & Organization (1990), pp. 167–198 CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Martinez, Marian Garcia, Verbruggen, Paul, and Fearne, Andrew, “Risk-based Approaches to Food Safety Regulation: What Role for Co-regulation?” 16 Journal of Risk Research (2013), pp. 1101–1121 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

11 Gunningham, Neil, “Regulating Small and Medium Sized Enterprises”, 14 Journal of Environmental Law (2002), pp. 3–32 CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Ian Bartle and Peter Vass, Self-Regulation and the Regulatory State; A Survey of Policy and Practice, Bath: Centre for the Study of Regulated Industries (2005).

12 Gunningham, Neil and Rees, Joseph, “Industry Self-Regulation: An Institutional Perspective”, 19 Law and Policy (1997), pp. 363–414 CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Potoski, Matthew and Prakash, Aseem, “A Club Theory Approach to Voluntary Programs”, in Potoski, Matthew and Prakash, Aseem (ed.) Voluntary Programs; A Club Theory Perspective (Cambridge MA: MIT Press, 2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

13 Grabosky, Peter N., “Using Non-Governmental Resources to Foster Regulatory Compliance”, in 8 Governance: An International Journal of Policy and Administration (1995), pp. 527–550 CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Bartle and Vass (2005).

14 Garcia-Martinez c.s. (2013).

15 Haines, Fiona, “Addressing the Risk, Reading the Landscape: The Role of Agency in Regulation”, 5 Regulation & Governance (2011), pp. 118–144 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

16 Grabosky, Peter N., “Beyond Responsive Regulation: The Expanding Role of Non-State Actors in the Regulatory Process”, 7 Regulation & Governance (2013), pp. 114–123 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

17 Garcia-Martinez c.s. (2013).

18 Scott, Colin, “Regulation in the Age of Governance: The Rise of the Post-Regulatory State”, in Jordana, Jacint and Levi-Faur, David (ed.) The Politics of Regulation (Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, 2003)Google Scholar; Black, Julia, “Constructing and Contesting Legitimacy and Accountability in Polycentric Regulatory Regimes”, in 2 Regulation & Governance (2009), pp. 137–164 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

19 Levi-Faur, David, “Regulatory Capitalism: The Dynamics of Change beyond Telecoms and Electricity”, 19 Governance: An International Journal of Policy, Administration, and Institutions (2006). pp. 497–525 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

20 Spiller, Pablo t., “Politicians, Interest Groups and Regulators: A Multiple-Principals Agency Theory of Regulations, or ‘Let them be Bribed’”, 33 Journal of Law and Economics (1990), pp. 56–101 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

21 O’Toole, Laurence J., “Treating Networks Seriously: Practical and Research-based Agendas in Public Administration”, 57 Public Administration Review (1997), pp. 45–52 CrossRefGoogle Scholar; de Bruijn, Hans, Heuvelhof, Ernst ten and Koopmans, Marieke, Law Enforcement;The Game Between Inspectors and Inspectees (Universal Publishers, Boca Raton, 2007)Google Scholar.

22 Jessop, Bob, “The Rise of Governance and the Risks of Failure: The Case of Economic Development”, 50 International Social Science Journal (1998), ppCrossRefGoogle Scholar. paginanummers; Koppenjan, Joop and Klijn, Erik Hans, Managing Uncertainties in Networks (London: Routledge, 2004)Google Scholar.

23 Reinicke, Wolfgang H.F., Deng, Francis M., Witte, Jan M., Benner, Thorsten, Whitaker, Beth and Gersham, John, Critical Choices: The United Nations, Networks and the Future of Global Governance (Ottawa: IDRC, 2000)Google Scholar; Mandell, Myrna P. and Keast, Robyn, “Evaluating the Effectiveness of Interorganizational Relations through Networks”, 10 Public Management Review (2010), pp. 715–731 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

24 Jessop (1998); Koppenjan and Klijn (2004).

25 Indirectly effectiveness for private actors as beneficiaries of regulation may be considered. See also Garry Gray, C. and Silbey, Susan S., “The Other Side of the Compliance Relationship”, in Parker, Christine and Nielsen, Vibeke L., Explaining Compliance; Business Responses to Regulation (Cheltenham UK: Edward Elgar, 2011), pp. 123–138 Google Scholar.

26 The Dutch Ministry of Public Health took over the file and changed the regime.

27 The interviews took place from May 2009 - July 2012 in the broader context of my Phd-thesis research. Haiko van der Voort, Naar een drie-eenheid van co-regulering; Over spanningen tussen drie toezichtregimes, 2013, available on the internet at http://www.tbm.tudelft.nl/over-faculteit/afdelingen/multi-actor-systems/people/assistant-professors/dr-hg-haiko-van-der-voort/

28 These figures are taken from the annual report of the Productschap Pluimvee en Eieren (The Commodity Board of Poultry and Eggs, 2011.

29 All interviews were conducted in Dutch. The quotes are translations by the author.

30 To be precise: it was a private organization that committed inspections mandated by the Ministry of Public Health.

31 Commission Regulation (EC) No 589/2008.

32 More specifically: this deals with the norm EN45011 regarding product certification.

33 Tombs, Steve and Whyte, David, “Transcending the Deregulation Debate? Regulation, Risk, and the Enforcement of Health and Safety Law in the UK”, 6 Regulation & Governance (2012), pp. 1–19 Google Scholar.

34 Van der Heijden, 2009, at p. 40.