Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T07:25:42.907Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

An Enlightened Approach to Legislative Scrutiny: Focusing on Effectiveness

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 July 2018

Helen XANTHAKI
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Symposium on Effective Law and Regulation
Information
European Journal of Risk Regulation , Volume 9 , Issue 3: Symposium on Effective Law and Regulation , September 2018 , pp. 431 - 444
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

Helen Xanthaki, LLB (Ath), MJur, PhD (Dunelm), SFHEA, is Professor of Law, UCL; Director of PGLaws Programmes, University of London; Senior Research Fellow, IALS; and President of the International Association for Legislation.

References

1 European Commission, “European Governance: Better lawmaking” (Communication) COM (2002) 275 final; EP, Council, Commission, Interinstitutional Agreement on better law-making [2003] OJ C C321/1, point 25, <eurlex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=CELEX:32003Q1231%2801%29:EN:NOT>; UK OPC, Drafting Guidance, 2017, <www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/666328/drafting_guidance_Dec_2017.pdf>; Australian OPC, Reducing complexity in legislation, June 2016, <www.opc.gov.au/about/docs/ReducingComplexity.pdf>; Government of Canada, Guide to Making Federal Acts and Regulations, 2001, <www.pco.gc.ca/docs/information/publications/legislation/pdf-eng.pdf>.

2 Xanthaki, H, “Transferability of Legislative Solutions” in C Stefanou and H Xanthaki (eds), Drafting Legislation. A Modern Approach (Ashgate 2008) 1 Google Scholar at 17; Xanthaki, H, Drafting Legislation. Art and Technology of Rules for Regulation (Hart 2014) 7 Google Scholar.

3 Xanthaki, H, “Drafting Manuals and Quality in Legislation: Positive Contribution towards Certainty in the Law or Impediment to the Necessity for Dynamism of Rules” (2010) IV(2) Legisprudence 115 Google Scholar.

4 Aristotle, Nichomachean Ethics (D Ross trans. 1980) Book VI, chs 5–11.

5 von Kirchmann, S-U, Die Werlosigkeit der Jursprudenz als Wissenschaft (Berlin, Verlage von Julius Springer 1848)Google Scholar.

6 Noel, J, “On the varieties of phronesis” (1999) 31 Educational Philosophy and Theory 273, 273 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

7 Vickers, G, The Art of Judgement: A Study of Policy Making (London, Sage 1995)Google Scholar.

8 E Voegelin, Phronesis as Deliberation, <http:/voegelin Jew.com/from-The-CollectedWorks/natural-law-and-aristotle-what-is-right-by-nature-pt-3/Phronesis-as-Deliberation-Phronesis-as-Knowledge-of-what-is-good.html>; and also Aristotle, Nicomachean Ethics, supra, note 4, 6.6–7.

9 Drawn from Flyvnergs definition of planning as phronesis: B Flyvbjerg, “Phronetic Planning Research: theoretical and methodological reflections” (2004) 5 Planning Theory and Practice 283, 287.

10 Deschamps, M, “L’acces a la justice, l’ affaire de chacun” (2009) 50 Cahiers de Droit 248, 253 Google Scholar.

11 Engle, E, “Aristotle, Law and Justice: the tragic hero” (2008) 35 NKyLRev 1, 4 Google Scholar.

12 Rideout, C, “Storytelling, narrative rationality, and legal persuasion” (2008) 14 Legal Writing: J Legal Writing Inst 53, 75 Google Scholar.

13 Moss, J, “Virtue Makes the Goal Right: Virtue and Phronesis in Aristotle’s Ethics” (2011) 56 Phronesis: A Journal for Ancient Philosophy 204 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

14 Griffiths, M and MacLeod, G, “Personal Narratives and Policy: Never the Twain?” (2008) 42 Journal of Philosophy of Education 121, 129 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

15 Arendt, H, The Human Condition (University of Chicago Press 1958) 129 Google Scholar.

16 Schwarze, S, “Performing Phronesis: The Case of Isocrates Helen” (1999) 32 Philosophy & Rhetoric 78, 78 Google Scholar.

17 Voermans, W, “Concern about the quality of EU legislation: what kind of problem, by what kind of standards?” (2009) Erasmus Law Review 66–68 Google Scholar; Karpen, U, “Efficacy, Effectiveness, Efficiency: From Judicial to Managerial Rationality” in K Messerschmidt and D Oliver-Lalana, Rational Lawmaking under Review: Legisprudence according to the German Federal Constitutional Court (Springer 2016) 303 Google Scholar ff.

18 Mousmouti, M, “Operationalising Quality of Legislation through the Effectiveness Test” (2012) 6(2) Legisprudence 201 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

19 M Zamboni, “Legislative Policy and effectiveness: a (small) contribution from legal theory” (2018) European Journal of Risk Regulation 6, who eloquently asks “effective in relation to what?”.

20 Laws, S, “Legislation and Politics” in D Feldman, Law in Politics, Politics and Law (Hart 2013) p 90 Google Scholar.

21 Zamboni, supra, note 19, 6–7.

22 Oliver-Lalana, OD, “Due Post-Legislative Process? On the Lawmakers’ Constitutional Duties of Monitoring and Revision” in K Messerschimdt and AD Oliver-Lalana (eds), Rational Lawmaking under Review. Legisprudence According to the German Federal Constitutional Court (Springer 2016) 259 Google Scholar.

23 Rachlinski, J, “Evidence-Based Law” (2011) 96 Cornell Law Review 901, 910 Google Scholar.

24 Xanthaki, H, Drafting Legislation: Art and Technology of Rules for Regulation (Hart 2014) 185–188 Google Scholar.

25 Berry, D, “Purpose Sections: Why They are a Good Idea for Drafters and Users” (2011) 2 The Loophole 49 Google Scholar.

26 Drummond, B and Marwood, P, “Purposive Drafting in Finance Bill 2007” (2007) 4 BTR 350, 354 Google Scholar.

27 Bransford, JD and Johnson, M K, “Contextual Prerequisites for Understanding: Some Investigations of Comprehension and Recall” (1972) 11 Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behaviour 717 CrossRefGoogle Scholar; also Miller, LMS,Cohen, JA, and Wingfield, A, “Contextual Knowledge Reduces Demands on Working Memory During Reading” (2006) 34 Memory Cognition 1355 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed.

28 Turnbull, IML, “Clear Legislative Drafting: New Approaches in Australia” (1990) 11 Statute Law Review 161, 169 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

29 Renton, Lord, “Interpretation of Legislation” (1982) Statute Law Review 7, 10 Google Scholar.

30 Greenberg, D, Craies on Legislation: A Practitioner’s Guide to the Nature, Process, Effect and Interpretation of Legislation (9th edn, London, Sweet and Maxwell 2008) 352 Google Scholar; also the detailed expose of Barnes, J, “Statutory Objects Provisions: How Cogent is the Research and Commentary?” (2012) 34 Statute Law Review 12 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

31 Office of the Scottish Parliamentary Counsel, Plain Language and Legislation (2006), <www.scotland.gov.uk/Publications/2006/02/17093804/0>, 40.

32 On the sunsetting policy, <www.bis.gov.uk/policies/better-regulation/better-regulation-executive/reducing-regulation-made-simple>.

33 Malik, M, “From Conflict to Cohesion: Competing Interests in Equality Law and Policy” (2009) 187 Equal Opportunity Review 11, 12–13 Google Scholar.

34 Beerworth, ER, “The Evaluation of Legislation” in R Tomasic (ed), Legislation and Society in Australia (Allen and Unwin 1980) 66, 68 Google Scholar.