Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T11:51:49.576Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Intractable Citizen and the Single-Minded Risk Expert – Mechanisms Causing the Risk Regulation Reflex Pointed Out in the Dutch Risk and Responsibility Programme

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Ira Helsloot  and
Arjen Schmidt
Ira Helsloot
Affiliation:
Radboud University Nijmegen,
Arjen Schmidt
Affiliation:
Radboud University Nijmegen,
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Safety regulations are too often disproportional in the sense that their costs outweigh the benefits. Although this is well known, years of trying to reduce safety related regulatory pressure has not resulted in much success. Two important causes for this have not received much attention up to now. One of these is a faulty perception of how the general public regards risk. We argue that the intractable citizen's behaviour needs better understanding. The second cause is the single-mindedness of risk experts which calls for specific instruments to be harnessed.

Type
Research Article
Information
European Journal of Risk Regulation , Volume 3 , Issue 3 , September 2012 , pp. 305 - 312
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Kobes, Margrethe, Helsloot, Ira, de Vries, Bauke and Post, Jos. G., “Building safety and human behaviour in fire: A literature review”, 45 (1) Fire Safety Journal (2009), pp.1 et sqq CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Kobes, Margrethe, Helsloot, Ira, Vries, Bauke de et al. “Way finding during fire evacuation; an analysis of unannounced fire drills in a hotel at night”, 45 (3) Building and Environment (2010), pp.537 et sqq CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

2 Some countries have altered their regulation to have the exit signs at knee height. This does however not change, as experiments show, the non-use of these signs in emergency situations.

3 See for example Rothstein, Henry, Huber, Michael and Gaskell, George, “A theory of risk colonization: The spiralling regulatory logics of societal and institutional risk”, 35 (1) Economy and Society (2006), pp.91 et sqq CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

4 Wildavsky, Aaron, Searching for Safety, (New Brunswick: Sage 1988)Google Scholar.

5 Burgess, Adam and Macrae, Donald, “‘An Experimental Offensive against the Mishandling of Risk in Society’: Reflecting on the Pioneering Work of the Risk Regulation Advisory Council in the UK”, 3(3) European Journal of Risk Regulation (2012), this issueCrossRefGoogle Scholar.

6 The UK Better Regulation Commission in its report ‘Risk, Responsibility and Regulation, whose risk is it anyway?’ distinguished 10 steps in the regulation of risk.

7 van Tol, Jan, “The Dutch Risk and Responsibility Programme”, 3(3) European Journal of Risk Regulation (2012), this issueCrossRefGoogle Scholar.

8 Reports from these workshops are available upon request. They have been published (in Dutch) as part of the R&R programme and have been reviewed by the participants.

9 Until now, it seems that Moore's law, which says that computers’ performance doubles every other year, is an exception to this rule.

10 Mackenbach, Johan P., Kunst, Anton E., Cavelaars, Adriënne E.J.M., et al, “Socioeconomic inequalities in morbidity and mortality in western Europe”, 349 (9066) The Lancet (1997), pp.1655 et sqq CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed.

11 Centraal Bureau voor de Statistiek, Lage inkomens, kans op armoede en uitsluiting 2009 (Lower incomes, chances of poverty and exclusion), (Den Haag: Centraal Bureau voor de Statistiek 2009).

12 Testimony of John D. Graham, Hearing: Testimony on “Cost-Justifying Regulations: Protecting Jobs and the Economy by Presidential and Judicial Review of Costs and Benefits,” Subcommittee on Courts, Commercial and Administrative Law, House Judiciary Committee, U.S. Congress, Washington, DC, May 4, 2011.

13 Wolf, Frederick, “Resource Availability, Commitment and Environmental Reliability & Safety: A Study of Petroleum Refineries”, 13(1) Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management (2005), pp.2 et sqq CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

14 de Jong, P.O. and Zijlstra, Sjoerd E., Wikken, wegen en (toch) wetgeven: Een onderzoek naar de hiërarchie en omvang van wetgeving (A study on the hierarchy and size of legislation), (Den Haag: WODC 2009)Google Scholar.

15 Ondernemersklankbord Regeldruk, Regels op maat, eindrapport van de commissie Stevens (Fitting regulations, final report by the Stevens committee) (Den Haag: Ministerie van Economische Zaken 2007).

16 Burgess and Macrae, “Reflecting on the Pioneering Work of the Risk Regulation Advisory Council in the UK”, supra note 5.

17 National Audit Office, Delivering regulatory reform: Department for Business, Innovation and Skills, (London: The Stationary Office 2011), at p. 9 Google Scholar.

18 Here one may ask the systematic question whether, without this reduction policy, there would not be many more regulations. There might very well be, but even so, the actual increase in the number of regulations can hardly be considered a success.

19 Starr, Chauncey, “Social Benefit versus Technological Risk. What is our Society Willing To Pay for Safety”, 165 Science (1969), pp. 1232 et sqq CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Fischhoff, Baruch, “Risk Perception and Communication Unplugged: Twenty Years of Process”, 15 (2) Risk Analysis (1995), pp.137 et sqq CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed; Slovic, Paul, The perception of risk, (London: Earthscan Publications 2000)Google Scholar.

20 Slovic, Paul, Fischhoff, Baruch and Lichtenstein, Sarah, “Why Study Risk Perception?”, 2(2) Risk Analysis (1982), pp.83 et sqq CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

21 Helsloot, Ira, “Een introductie tot het gebruik van symboliek in de voorzorgsmaatschappij” (An introduction to the use of symbolism in the precautionary society), in: Hildebrandt, Mireille and Pieterman, Roel, Zorg om voorzorg (Den Haag: Boom Juridische Uitgevers 2010)Google Scholar.

22 van Eeten, Michel and Bouder, Frederic, “The Diva and Destiny: Can the Voter be Appeased with Fatalism?”, 3(3) European Journal of Risk Regulation (2012), this issueCrossRefGoogle Scholar.

23 Beddington, John, Blackett review of high impact low probability risks, (London: Government Office for Science 2011), at p. 25 Google Scholar.

24 Evans, Andrew, “Railway risks, safety values and safety costs”, 158 Transport, part of the Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers (2005)Google Scholar.

25 This research was conducted by having three online communities with twenty participants of a week each in which principles for good governing of risk were discussed. Elmara Bemer, Diane Fase and Sibolt Mulder, Fase 3: oplossingsrichtingen en principes: bevindingen derde RiVerRaad burgercommunity (TNS NIPO: Amsterdam 2012).

26 The story of Son en Breugel is based on the involvement of one of the authors with implementing this communication policy since 2002.

27 This advice is contrary to the official national governmental advice that states that people should go inside, close windows and seek for instructions to be given via the radio.

28 Kraft, Michael E. and Clary, Bruce B., “Citizen Participation and the Nimby Syndrome: Public Response to Radioactive Waste Disposal”, 44 (2) Political Research Quarterly (1991), pp.299 et sqq CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

29 Frissen, Paul H.A., Gevaar verplicht: Over de noodzaak van aristocratische politiek (Mandatory Danger: On the need of Aristocratic Politics) (Amsterdam: Van Gennep 2009)Google Scholar.

30 The interviews of 1–2 hours each were held to discuss the RRR. All interviews have been transcribed and are available for review by contacting the authors.

31 A BLEVE is an explosion of a tank containing liquefied fuel gas.

32 Helsloot, Ira, “Handhaving brandveiligheid; wat is er bereikt vijf jaar na Volendam” (Fire Safety Enforcement: What has been Accomplished five years after Volendam?), in Muller, Erwin and Michiels, Lex (eds), Handhaving (Den Haag: Kluwer 2006)Google Scholar.

33 Health Council of the Netherlands, Bestrijding van Legionella (Fighting Legionnaires Disease), (Den Haag: Health Council of the Netherlands 2003), at p. 36 Google Scholar.

34 The Health Council adds that the actual number of unreported cases may be considerably higher, estimating it at 800.

35 Free adaptation of Mintzberg's conclusions about the machine bureaucracy: Mintzberg, Henri, The structuring of organisations, (New Jersey: Prentice Hall 1979)Google Scholar. See for a similar argument concerning crisis management policies: Rosenthal, Uriel Hart, Paul 't and Kouunin, Alexander, “The Bureau-politics of Crisis Management”, 69(2) Public Administration (1991), pp.211–233 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

36 See Interdepartementale Projectdirectie Administratieve Lasten, Meten is weten. Handleiding voor het definiëren en meten van administratieve lasten voor het bedrijfsleven (‘To measure is to know. Guide to defining and measuring administrative costs for the private sector’), (Den Haag: Rijksoverheid 2003).

37 Actal, Onderzoeksrapport naar de behoeften van gebruikers van integrale analyses voor beleid en wetgeving (‘Research report on the needs of users of integral analyses for policy and legislation’), (Den Haag: Actal 2010).

38 Taskforce Vereenvoudiging Vergunningen, Eenvoudig Vergunnen. Advies van de Taskforce Vereenvoudiging Vergunningen (‘Permits made easy. Advice by the Simplification of Permits Taskforce’) (Den Haag: Taskforce Vereenvoudiging Vergunningen 2005).

39 See Ondernemersklankbord Regeldruk, Regels op maat, eindrapport van de commissie Stevens (Fitting regulations, final report by the Stevens committee) (Den Haag: Ministerie van Economische Zaken 2007).

40 Simon, Herbert A., Models of Bounded Rationality: Empirically grounded economic reason (Boston: MIT Press, 1982)Google Scholar.

41 P.O. de Jong and S.E. Zijlstra, Wikken, wegen en (toch) wetgeven: Een onderzoek naar de hiërarchie en omvang van wetgeving (A study on the hierarchy and size of legislation), (Den Haag: WODC 2009), at p. 15.

42 The title of a contribution of Sarah Veale of the UK Trades Union Congress in this journal is a case in point: Veale, Sarah, “Better regulation yes – de-regulation no”, 2(2) European Journal of Risk Regulation (2011), pp.263–265 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

43 Deregulierungsgesetz 2006

44 P.O. de Jong and Sjoerd E. Zijlstra, Wikken, wegen en (toch) wetgeven: Een onderzoek naar de hiërarchie en omvang van wetgeving (A study on the hierarchy and size of legislation), (Den Haag: WODC 2009), at p. 156.