Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T17:29:14.022Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

On the delineation and higher-level classification of algae

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 1998

MARK A. RAGAN
Affiliation:
Canadian Institute for Advanced Research, Program in Evolutionary Biology, and NRC Institute for Marine Biosciences, 1411 Oxford Street, Halifax, N.S. Canada B3H 3Z1
Get access

Abstract

Biological classification has been successively shaped by Neoplatonism, ideas of plenitude and one-dimensional continuity (the Great Chain of Being), two-dimensional continuity (Linnaeus's map), idealized comparative morphology and development and, through phylogenetic theory, Darwinian descent with modification. Concepts of Algae have thus evolved within a succession of very different paradigms. Algae have been imperfect plants; a segment of the Great Chain; the least-developed members of vegetative form-series; and primitive forms from which plants (and even animals) can be elaborated. The idea of a single grouping of simple organisms, formalized by Bory de Saint-Vincent and others in the early nineteenth century, was developed in a phylogenetic framework by Haeckel as Protista. Most macrophytic algae, however, remained Plants until Copeland merged eukaryotic non-green algae into Protista. Arrangements of algal taxa within form-series, and recognition of Algae and Protista as taxa, are incompatible with Hennigian phylogenetic systematics (cladistics). Developing genomic perspectives threaten to undermine established concepts of organismal lineage and higher-level biological classification.

Type
Review
Copyright
© 1998 British Phycological Society

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)