Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-s2hrs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-08T17:36:55.645Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The ontological security of special relationships: the case of Germany’s relations with Israel

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 November 2018

Kai Oppermann  and
Mischa Hansel
Kai Oppermann*
Affiliation:
University of Sussex
Mischa Hansel
Affiliation:
RWTH Aachen University
*
*Corresponding author. Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article suggests studying special relationships in international politics from an ontological security perspective. It argues that conceptualising the partners to special relationships as ontological security seekers provides a promising theoretical angle to address gaps in our understanding of three important dimensions of such relations: their emergence and stability; the processes and practices of maintaining them; and the power relations within special relations. The article illustrates its theoretical argument in a case study on the German-Israeli relationship. The close partnership between the two countries that has developed since the Holocaust ranks as one of the most remarkable examples of special relationships in the international arena. We argue that foregrounding the ontological security that the special relationship provides, in particular for Germany, sheds important new light on how German-Israeli relations have developed. Specifically, we hold that Germany’s ontological security needs were already an important driver in establishing the relationship and have been a key stabiliser of it ever since; that the ontological security perspective can make sense of three interrelated practices of maintaining the ‘specialness’ of the relationship; and that the asymmetries between the ontological security needs of the two partners help account for Israel’s political leverage in the relationship.

Keywords

Special RelationshipsOntological SecurityIsraelGermany
Type
Research Article
Information
European Journal of International Security , Volume 4 , Issue 1 , February 2019 , pp. 79 - 100
Copyright
© British International Studies Association 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Harnisch, Sebastian, ‘Special relationships in foreign policy’, in Cameron Thies (ed.), The Oxford Encyclopedia of Foreign Policy Analysis, Volume II (New York: Oxford University Press, 2018), pp. 710–722 Google Scholar.

2 Gardner Feldman, Lily, Germany’s Foreign Policy of Reconciliation: From Enmity to Amity (Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield, 2012)Google Scholar.

3 Mitzen, Jennifer, ‘Ontological security in world politics: State identity and the security dilemma’, European Journal of International Relations, 12:3 (2006), pp. 341–370 CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Steele, Brent J., Ontological Security in International Relations: Self-Identity and the IR State (London: Routledge, 2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Zarakol, Ayşe, ‘States and ontological security: a historical rethinking’, Cooperation and Conflict, 52:1 (2017), pp. 48–68 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

4 Harnisch, Sebastian, ‘Special relationships: Sonderbeziehungen als analytische Brücke zwischen Außenpolitik und internationalen Beziehungen’, in Sebastian Harnisch, Klaus Brummer, and Kai Oppermann (eds), Sonderbeziehungen als Nexus zwischen Außenpolitik und internationalen Beziehungen (Baden-Baden: Nomos, 2015), pp. 25–52 Google Scholar.

5 Auswärtiges Amt, ‘Rede von Außenminister Frank-Walter Steinmeier vor dem Deutschen Bundestag’, Berlin (7 May 2015), available at: {http://www.auswaertiges-amt.de/DE/Infoservice/Presse/Reden/2015/150507-BM_BT_D_ISR.html} accessed 15 November 2017; ‘Was sich in 50 Jahren ereignet hat, ist ein Wunder’, Die Welt (12 May 2015), available at: {http://www.welt.de/politik/deutschland/article140864287/Was-sich-in-50-Jahren-ereignet-hat-ist-ein-Wunder.html} accessed 15 November 2017.

6 See, for example, Dumbrell, John, A Special Relationship: Anglo-American Relations from the Cold War to Iraq (2nd edn, Basingstoke: Palgrave, 2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

7 Sloan Dickey, John, Canada and the American Presence: The United States Interest in an Independent Canada (New York: New York University Press, 1975)Google Scholar.

8 Klaus Brummer, ‘Die Sonderbeziehung zwischen Australien und den USA: “All the Way”?’, in Harnisch, Brummer, and Oppermann (eds), Sonderbeziehungen als Nexus zwischen Außenpolitik und internationalen Beziehungen, pp. 81–105.

9 Gardner Feldman, Germany’s Foreign Policy of Reconciliation.

10 See also Harnisch, ‘Special relationships’.

11 See, for example, Siegfried Schieder, ‘Solidarität als konstitutives Element von Sonderbeziehungen: Frankreich und Schweden in den Cotonou-Verhandlungen’, in Harnisch, Brummer, and Oppermann (eds), Sonderbeziehungen als Nexus zwischen Außenpolitik und internationalen Beziehungen, pp. 261–86.

12 Gardner Feldman, Lily, The Special Relationship between West Germany and Israel (Boston: George Allen & Unwin, 1984). p. 7 Google Scholar.

13 Weldes, Jutta, Cultures of Insecurity: States, Communities, and the Production of Danger (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1999)Google Scholar.

14 Berenskoetter, Felix, ‘Friends, there are no friends? An intimate reframing of the international’, Millennium, 35:3 (2007), p. 659 Google Scholar.

15 In many special relationships that entails a moral and historical dimension. While this dimension is particularly strong in the German-Israeli case, it is also present, for example, in the special relationships between Germany and Poland or the UK and India. Other special relationships – such as the Anglo-American case – are less defined by historical guilt but still derive a sense of solidarity from a shared history.

16 Wendt, Alexander, Social Theory of International Politics (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999), pp. 260–263 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

17 Chan, Steve, Enduring Rivalries in the Asia-Pacific (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

18 See Harnisch, ‘Special relationships’.

19 Gardner Feldman, The Special Relationship between West Germany and Israel, p. 252; Bially Mattern, Janice, ‘The power politics of identity’, European Journal of International Relations, 7:3 (2001), pp. 349–397 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

20 Wendt, Social Theory of International Politics, pp. 145–50.

21 Roshchin, Evgeny, ‘The concept of friendship: From princes to states’, European Journal of International Relations, 12:4 (2006), pp. 599–624 CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Smith, Graham M., ‘Friendship and the world of states’, International Politics, 48:1 (2011), pp. 10–27 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

22 Berenskoetter, ‘Friends, there are no friends?’, pp. 666–7.

23 See also Harnisch, ‘Special relationships in foreign policy’, p. 711.

24 Berenskoetter, Felix and van Hoef, Yuri, ‘Friendship and foreign policy’, in Cameron Thies (ed.), The Oxford Encyclopedia of Foreign Policy Analysis, Volume I (New York: Oxford University Press, 2018), p. 750 Google Scholar.

25 Felix Berenskoetter and Mor Mitrani, ‘Is it Friendship? An Analysis of German-Israeli Relations’, paper presented at the 11th Pan-European Conference on International Relations, European International Studies Association (EISA), Barcelona, 13–16 September 2017.

26 Asseburg, Muriel and Busse, Jan, ‘Deutschlands Politik gegenüber Israel’, in Thomas Jäger, Alexander Höse, and Kai Oppermann (eds), Deutsche Außenpolitik: Sicherheit, Wohlfahrt, Institutionen und Normen (Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, 2011), pp. 693–716 Google Scholar; Kloke, Martin, ‘40 Jahre deutsch-israelische Beziehungen’ (Bonn: Bundeszentrale für politische Bildung, 2005)Google Scholar, available at: {http://www.bpb.de/izpb/25044/40-jahre-deutsch-israelische-beziehungen?p=all} accessed 4 February 2015.

27 Lavy, George, Germany and Israel: Moral Debt and National Interest (London: Frank Cass, 1996), p. 207 Google Scholar.

28 Ulrike Putz, ‘Merkel in the Knesset: “We would never abandon Israel”’, Spiegel online, available at: {http://www.spiegel.de/international/world/merkel-in-the-knesset-we-would-never-abandon-israel-a-542311.html} accessed 4 February 2015.

29 Deutsche Bundesregierung, ‘Rede von Bundeskanzlerin Angela Merkel vor der Knesset in Jerusalem’, Jerusalem (18 March 2008), available at: {http://www.bundesregierung.de/Content/DE/Publikation_alt/Anlagen-be/_Anlagen/2008-03-18-merkel-rede-knesset.pdf;jsessionid=28FAB9E5437BAFE87123FA640D63FBD9.s2t1?__blob=publicationFile&v=2} accessed 22 January 2016.

30 Felix Berenskoetter, ‘Germany and Israel: Is It Friendship?’, LSE Ideas (1 October 2012), available at: {http://blogs.lse.ac.uk/ideas/2012/10/germany-and-israel-is-it-friendship} accessed 4 February 2015.

31 Gardner Feldman, Lily, ‘The principle and practice of “reconciliation” in German foreign policy: Relations with France, Israel, Poland and the Czech Republic’, International Affairs, 75:2 (1999), pp. 333–356 CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Günther Nonnenmacher, ‘Besondere Beziehungen’, Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung (31 January 2010).

32 ‘Germany and Israel: Friends in high places’, The Economist (22 March 2008).

33 ‘Germany and Israel: a very special relationship’, The Economist (31 January 2015).

34 Steele, Ontological Security in International Relations, p. 51.

35 Giddens, Anthony, Modernity and Self-Identity: Self and Society in the Late Modern Age (Cambridge: Polity Press, 1991), pp. 54, 243 Google Scholar.

36 Mitzen, Jennifer, ‘Anchoring Europe’s civilizing identity: Habits, capabilities and ontological security’, Journal of European Public Policy, 13:2 (2006), pp. 272–273 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

37 Wendt, Social Theory of International Politics, p. 131.

38 Steele, Ontological Security in International Relations, pp. 10–12.

39 Giddens, Modernity and Self-Identity, p. 40.

40 Kinnvall, Catarina, ‘Globalization and religious nationalism: Self, identity, and the search for ontological security’, Political Psychology, 25:4 (2004), p. 746 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

41 Zarakol, ‘States and ontological security’.

42 Steele, Ontological Security in International Relations, pp. 15–20.

43 Berenskoetter, Felix, ‘Parameters of a national biography’, European Journal of International Relations, 20:1 (2014), pp. 268–270 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

44 Mitzen, ‘Ontological security in world politics’, p. 352.

45 Mitzen, ‘Ontological security in world politics’.

46 Berenskoetter, ‘Friends, there are no friends?’.

47 Zarakol, Ayşe, ‘Ontological (in)security and state denial of historical crimes: Turkey and Japan’, International Relations, 24:1 (2010), pp. 3–23 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

48 Ibid., p. 3.

49 Ibid., pp. 6–7.

50 Browning, Christopher S. and Joenniemi, Pertti, ‘From fratricide to security community: Re-theorising difference in the constitution of Nordic peace’, Journal of International Relations and Development, 16:4 (2013), pp. 495–496 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

51 Kinnvall, ‘Globalization and religious nationalism’, pp. 747–9.

52 Mitzen, ‘Ontological security in world politics’, pp. 346–7.

53 Giddens, Modernity and Self-Identity, p. 36.

54 Mitzen, ‘Anchoring Europe’s civilizing identity’, pp. 271–2.

55 Giddens, Modernity and Self-Identity, p. 38.

56 Mitzen, ‘Anchoring Europe’s civilizing identity’, p. 279.

57 Harnisch, ‘Special relationships’.

58 Kinnvall, ‘Globalization and religious nationalism’, pp. 752–7.

59 Steele, Brent J., ‘Ontological security and the power of self-identity: British neutrality and the American Civil War’, Review of International Studies, 31:3 (2005), p. 538 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

60 Subotić, Jelena, ‘Narrative, ontological security, and foreign policy change’, Foreign Policy Analysis, 12:4 (2016), p. 624 Google Scholar.

61 Dickie, John, ‘Special’ No More: Anglo-American Relations: Rhetoric and Reality (London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson, 1994)Google Scholar.

62 Mitzen, ‘Anchoring Europe’s civilizing identity’, pp. 350–1.

63 Subotić, ‘Narrative, ontological security, and foreign policy change’, pp. 612–15.

64 Löwenheim, Nava, ‘A haunted past: Requesting forgiveness for wrongdoing in International Relations’, Review of International Studies, 35:3 (2009), pp. 544–545 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

65 Steele, Ontological Security in International Relations, pp. 50–5.

66 Huysmans, Jef, ‘Security! What do you mean? From concept to thick signifier’, European Journal of International Relations, 4:2 (1998), pp. 238–244 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

67 Steele, Ontological Security in International Relations, pp. 74–5.

68 Steele, ‘Ontological security and the power of self-identity’, p. 539.

69 For the UK-US special relationship, see Wallace, William and Phillips, Christopher, ‘Reassessing the special relationship’, International Affairs, 85:2 (2009), pp. 263–284 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

70 Cited in Jelinek, Yeshayahu (ed.), Zwischen Macht und Moralpolitik: Eine Dokumentensammlung (Gerlingen: Bleicher Verlag, 1997), p. 174 Google Scholar.

71 Belkin, Paul, Germany’s Relations with Israel: Background and Implications for German Middle East Policy (Washington: Congressional Research Service, 2007), p. 2 Google Scholar, available at: {https://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/row/RL33808.pdf} accessed 22 January 2016.

72 Gardner Feldman, The Special Relationship between West Germany and Israel, p. 62.

73 Jelinek, Yeshayahu, Deutschland und Israel 1945–1965: Ein neurotisches Verhältnis (München: Oldenbourg Verlag, 2004), pp. 179–184 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

74 Löwenheim, ‘A haunted past’, pp. 549–53; Gardner Feldman, ‘The principle and practice of “reconciliation” in German foreign policy’, p. 340; Gardner Feldman, The Special Relationship between West Germany and Israel, pp. 49–53; Lavy, Germany and Israel, p. 134.

75 Markus A. Weingardt, Deutsche Israel- und Nahostpolitik: Die Geschichte einer Gratwanderung seit 1949 (Frankfurt a.M.: Campus Verlag, 2002), p. 74; Jelinek, Deutschland und Israel 1945–1965, pp. 86–7, 185–6.

76 Jelinek, Deutschland und Israel 1945–1965, p. 161.

77 Cited in Jelinek (ed.), Zwischen Macht und Moralpolitik, p. 178.

78 See Jelinek, Deutschland und Israel 1945–1965, pp. 140–1.

79 Weingardt, Deutsche Israel- und Nahostpolitik, pp. 99–103.

80 Jelinek, Deutschland und Israel 1945–1965, pp. 298–9; Jelinek (ed.), Zwischen Macht und Moralpolitik, p. 443.

81 Jelinek (ed.), Zwischen Macht und Moralpolitik, p. 417.

82 Hansen, Niels, ‘Moral als Staatsräson: Zur Politik Konrad Adenauers gegenüber Israel und den Juden’, Die politische Meinung, 373 (2002), p. 26 Google Scholar.

83 Cited in Jelinek (ed.), Zwischen Macht und Moralpolitik, p. 476.

84 Foreign Minister Heinrich von Brentano in talks with the ambassador of Iraq, cited in Jelinek (ed.), Zwischen Macht und Moralpolitik, p. 447.

85 See Jelinek (ed.), Zwischen Macht und Moralpolitik, p. 442.

86 Jelinek, Deutschland und Israel 1945–1965, pp. 276–89; Weingardt, Deutsche Israel- und Nahostpolitik, pp. 106–12.

87 von Hindenburg, Hannfried, Demonstrating Reconciliation: State and Society in West German Foreign Policy toward Israel, 1952–1965 (New York and Oxford: Berghahn Books, 2007), pp. 20–26 Google Scholar.

88 Ibid., p. 54.

89 Ibid., pp. 68–84.

90 Wolffsohn, Michael and Brechenmacher, Thomas, ‘Israel’, in Siegmar Schmidt, Gunther Hellmann, and Reinhard Wolf (eds), Handbuch zur deutschen Außenpolitik (Wiesbaden: VS Verlag, 2007), pp. 506–520 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

91 Cited in von Hindenburg, Demonstrating Reconciliation, p. 75.

92 von Hindenburg, Demonstrating Reconciliation, pp. 26–34, 50–4, 114–17; Jelinek, Deutschland und Israel 1945–1965, pp. 126, 128.

93 von Hindenburg, Demonstrating Reconciliation, pp. 146–55.

94 Cited in ibid., p. 162.

95 Deutscher Bundestag, ‘Plenarprotokoll’, 111. Sitzung, Bonn (7 June 1967), p. 5304.

96 Weingardt, Deutsche Israel- und Nahostpolitik, p. 190.

97 Klaus Harpprecht, ‘Der falsche Verdacht: Eine geheime Episode in der Geschichte deutsch-amerikanischer Beziehungen’, Die Zeit (27 April 2000), available at: {http://www.zeit.de/2000/18/Der_falsche_Verdacht} accessed 21 January 2016.

98 Weingardt, Deutsche Israel- und Nahostpolitik, p. 210; Wolfgang Schmidt, ‘Aus historischer Verantwortung, moralischer Verpflichtung und politischer Überzeugung: Wie sich Bundeskanzler Willy Brandt um Israel und den Frieden im Nahen Osten bemühte’ (Berlin: Bundeskanzler-Willy-Brandt-Stiftung, 2014), available at: {http://www.willy-brandt.de/fileadmin/stiftung/Downloads/Schriftenreihe/Heft_26_Nahost.pdf} accessed 21 January 2016.

99 Cited in ibid., pp. 83–5.

100 Dietrich Strothmann, ‘Stirbt die Sünde mit den Menschen? Der Bundeskanzler schlug ein neues Kapitel auf’, Die Zeit (15 June 1973), available at: {http://www.zeit.de/1973/25/stirbt-die-suende-mit-den-menschen} accessed 21 January 2016.

101 Cited in Gardner Feldman, The Special Relationship between West Germany and Israel, p. 186.

102 Weingardt, Deutsche Israel- und Nahostpolitik, p. 338.

103 Deutscher Bundestag, ‘Plenarprotokoll’, 105. Sitzung, Bonn (9 June 1982), pp. 6343–4.

104 Jürgen Leinemann, ‘Einen schönen Salat hat man euch serviert’, Der Spiegel (30 January 1984), available at: {http://www.spiegel.de/spiegel/print/d-13510455.html} accessed 22 January 2016.

105 See Weingardt, Deutsche Israel- und Nahostpolitik, p. 322.

106 Gardner Feldman, ‘The principle and practice of “reconciliation” in German foreign policy’, p. 356.

107 Weingardt, Deutsche Israel- und Nahostpolitik, pp. 207–08.

108 Belkin, Germany’s Relations with Israel, p. 3.

109 Schmidt, ‘Aus historischer Verantwortung’; Gardner Feldmann, ‘The principle and practice of “reconciliation” in German foreign policy’, p. 345.

110 Cited in in Asseburg and Busse, ‘Deutschlands Politik gegenüber Israel’, p. 697.

111 Cited in Weingardt, Deutsche Israel- und Nahostpolitik, p. 334.

112 Deutscher Bundestag, ‘Plenarprotokoll’, 233. Sitzung, Berlin (25 April 2002), p. 23115.

113 Belkin, Germany’s Relations with Israel, p. 9.

114 Cited in Britain Israel Communications & Research Center, ‘Israel’s Foreign Relations: The Israel-German Special Relationship’ (23 November 2005), available at: {http://web.archive.org/web/20070312180139/http://www.bicom.org.uk/publications/israels_foreign_relations/s/1207/the-israel-german-special-relationship/} accessed 22 January 2016.

115 Lorena de Vita, ‘German and Israeli ties in 2015 and 1965: the difficult special relationship’, International Affairs, 91:4 (2015), p. 839.

116 Ezer Weizman, ‘Rede vor dem Deutschen Bundestag’, Bonn (16 January 1996), available at: {https://www.bundestag.de/kulturundgeschichte/geschichte/gastredner/weizman/weizman/197116} accessed 30 September 2016.

117 Shimon Peres, ‘Address by the President of the State of Israel, H. E. Shimon Peres, at the German Bundestag’, Berlin (27 January 2010), available at: {https://www.bundestag.de/kulturundgeschichte/geschichte/gastredner/peres/speech/248112} accessed 30 September 2016.

118 Moshe Katsav, ‘Rede vor dem Deutschen Bundestag und Bundesrat’, Berlin (31 May 2005), available at: {https://www.bundestag.de/kulturundgeschichte/geschichte/gastredner/katsav/rede_katsav} accessed 30 September 2016.

119 Peres, ‘Address by the President of the State of Israel’.

120 Katsav, ‘Rede vor dem Deutschen Bundestag und Bundesrat’.

121 Weizmann, ‘Rede vor dem Deutschen Bundestag’.

122 Peres, ‘Address by the President of the State of Israel’.

123 Giddens, Modernity and Self-Identity, p. 38.

124 UN General Assembly, ‘Twenty-eighth Special Session, Official Record’, A/S-28/PV.1, New York (24 January 2005), pp. 1–19, available at: {https://documents-dds-ny.un.org/doc/UNDOC/GEN/N05/216/36/PDF/N0521636.pdf?OpenElement}, accessed 30 September 2016.

125 Bundespräsidialamt, ‘Staatsbankett, gegeben vom Präsidenten des Staates Israel’, Jerusalem (29 May 2012), available at: {http://www.bundespraesident.de/SharedDocs/Reden/DE/Joachim-Gauck/Reden/2012/05/120529-Israel-Staatsbankett.html} accessed 3 April 2016.

126 Roman Herzog, cited in Weingardt, Deutsche Israel- und Nahostpolitik, p. 359.

127 Kloke, ‘40 Jahre deutsch-israelische Beziehungen’.

128 Bundespräsidialamt, ‘Ansprache vor der Knesset’, Jerusalem (16 February 2000), available at: {http://www.bundespraesident.de/SharedDocs/Reden/DE/Johannes-Rau/Reden/2000/02/20000216_Rede.html} accessed 22 January 2016.

129 Bundespräsidialamt, ‘Ansprache von Bundespräsident Horst Köhler vor der Knesset in Jerusalem’, Jerusalem (2 February 2005), available at: {http://www.bundespraesident.de/SharedDocs/Reden/DE/Horst-Koehler/Reden/2005/02/20050202_Rede.html} accessed 3 April 2016.

130 Deutsche Bundesregierung, ‘Rede von Bundeskanzlerin Angela Merkel vor der Knesset in Jerusalem’.

131 See Levy, Daniel, ‘The future of the past: Historiographical disputes and competing memories in Germany and Israel’, History and Theory, 38:1 (1999), pp. 59–61 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

132 Peres, ‘Address by the President of the State of Israel’.

133 Ibid.

134 Angela Merkel, ‘Speech to the US Congress’, Washington (3 November 2009), available at: {http://www.german-way.com/notable-people/featured-bios/angela-merkel/angela-merkels-2009-speech-to-the-us-congress/} accessed 3 April 2016.

135 Israeli Mission to the European Union, ‘PM Netanyahu and Chancellor Merkel Issue Joint Statement at the Inter-governmental Consultations’, Berlin (16 February 2016), available at: {http://embassies.gov.il/eu/NewsAndEvents/Pages/Israel-Germany-G2G-Joint-Statement.aspx} accessed 6 April 2016.

136 United Nations General Assembly (2005), p. 18.

137 Berenskoetter, ‘Germany and Israel’.

138 Steele, ‘Ontological security and the power of self-identity’, p. 526.

139 Berenskoetter, Felix and Giegerich, Bastian, ‘From NATO to ESDP: a social constructivist analysis of German strategic adjustment after the end of the Cold War’, Security Studies, 19:3 (2010), pp. 407–452 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

140 Bially Mattern, ‘The power politics of identity’, pp. 358–65.

141 Gardner Feldman, ‘The principle and practice of “reconciliation” in German foreign policy’, pp. 340–2.

142 Gardner Feldman, The Special Relationship between West Germany and Israel, p. 44; Lavy, Germany and Israel, p. 210.

143 Berenskoetter, ‘Germany and Israel’.

144 Cited in Weingard, Deutsche Israel- und Nahostpolitik, p. 198.

145 Wolffsohn and Brechenmacher, ‘Israel’, p. 512.

146 De Vita, ‘German and Israeli ties in 2015 and 1965’, pp. 836–7.

147 ‘Möllemann weicht zurück’, Berliner Zeitung (7 June 2002), available at: {http://www.berliner-zeitung.de/archiv/fdp-vize-entschuldigt-sich-bei-den-juden--nicht-aber-bei-friedman-karsli-verlaesst-fraktion---westerwelle--verletzungen-koennen-heilen-moellemann-weicht-zurueck,10810590,10001912.html} accessed 22 January 2016.

148 Felix Berenskoetter, ‘An Act of Friendship? Re-reading Grass on German-Israeli Relations’, LSE Ideas (1 October 2012), available at: {http://blogs.lse.ac.uk/ideas/2012/10/an-act-of-friendship-re-reading-grass-on-german-israeli-relations/} accessed 8 April 2016.

149 ‘Günter Grass, der ewige Antisemit’, Die Welt (4 April 2012).

150 Gareth Jones, ‘German author Grass says Israel endangers world peace’, Reuters (4 April 2012), available at: {http://www.reuters.com/article/us-germany-israel-grass-idUSBRE8330J020120404} accessed 8 April 2016.

151 ‘Klare Mehrheit der Deutschen steht an Israels Seite’, Die Welt (21 April 2012).

152 Given the unsurprisingly very strong domestic opposition against any interaction with representatives from the country that had murdered six million European Jews, a reciprocal relationship with Germany was politically and morally inconceivable from the perspective of the Israeli government at the time. The fact that it negotiated with Germany at all enabled the ‘miracle’ (Auswärtiges Amt 2015) of the German-Israeli special relationship.

153 Meeting in the Israeli Foreign Ministry (1953), cited in Jelinek (ed.), Zwischen Macht und Moralpolitik, p. 246.

154 Cited in Gardner Feldman, The Special Relationship between West Germany and Israel, p. 43.

155 Lavy, Germany and Israel, p. 139.

156 Adenauer cited in Lavy, Germany and Israel, p. 141.

157 Cited in ‘Behind the scenes of Israel’s new submarine deal with Germany’, Haaretz (25 March 2012), available at: {http://www.haaretz.com/israel-news/behind-the-scenes-of-israel-s-new-submarine-deal-with-germany-1.420551} accessed 30 September 2016.

158 ‘Made in Germany’, Der Spiegel (2 March 2012), pp. 20–33.

159 ‘Deutsche U-Boote für Israel: Historische Verantwortung sticht politische Grundsätze’, Süddeutsche Zeitung (5 June 2012), available at: {http://www.sueddeutsche.de/politik/deutsche-u-boote-fuer-israel-historische-verantwortung-sticht-politische-grundsaetze-1.1374358} accessed 21 May 2016.

160 Haaretz, Behind the scenes of Israel’s new submarine deal with Germany’.

161 ‘Merkel begründet Waffendeal mit Israels Marine’, Die Welt (12 May 2015), available at: {http://www.welt.de/politik/deutschland/article140854190/Merkel-begruendet-Waffendeal-mit-Israels-Marine.html} accessed 21 May 2016.

162 ‘Bund zahlt bis zu 540 Millionen Euro für U-Boot-Deal mit Israel’, Handelsblatt (23 October 2017), available at: {http://www.handelsblatt.com/politik/deutschland/ruestungsgeschaeft-bund-zahlt-bis-zu-540-millionen-euro-fuer-u-boot-deal-mit-israel/20491544.html} accessed 16 November 2017.

163 ‘Israel drängt Kanzleramt zur Zustimmung zum U-Boot-Deal’, Die Zeit (11 October 2017), available at: {http://www.zeit.de/politik/ausland/2017-10/israel-u-boote-export-thyssenkrupp} accessed 16 November 2017.

164 Ibid.

165 Karp, Regina, ‘Germany: a “normal’ global actor?’, German Politics, 18:1 (2009), pp. 12–35 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

166 Chacko, Prya, ‘A new “special relationship”?: Power transitions, ontological security, and India-US relations’, International Studies Perspectives, 15:3 (2014), pp. 329–346 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.