Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T14:06:09.720Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Roman life course: a view from the inscriptions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 January 2017

Louise Revell
Louise Revell*
Affiliation:
University of Southampton, UK
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Epitaphs inscribed on stone record biographical information about the deceased, and in certain cases, the age at death. However, it has been demonstrated that these ages on Roman epitaphs are not an accurate reflection of the demographics of death, but are subject to cultural bias. Using the idea of the ‘life course’, this article explores these cultural biases and their relationship to age and gender structures. Material from Italy suggests that these are tied into ideologies of gender, with adulthood defined by the transition to magistrate for men and wife for women. Material from other areas demonstrates different patterns, and in the case of Etruria, these are shown to be a negotiation between pre-Roman and Romanized customs. The phenomenon of ‘age-rounding’ is also argued to be part of these ideas of correct age.

Les épitaphes sur pierre contiennent des informations biographiques sur les défunts et, dans certains cas, leur âge au moment de leur mort. Toutefois on a démontré que ces indications d'âge dans les épitaphes romaines ne sont pas un reflet exact des données démographiques des décès, mais sont soumis à des tendances culturelles. En utilisant le concept du ‘cours de vie’, cet article examine ces tendances culturelles et leur relation avec les structures d'âge et de sexe. En se basant sur des pierres italiennes, on prétend que ces tendances étaient liées à des idéologies de sexe, l'âge adulte étant pour l'homme le moment où il atteint la position de magistrat et pour la femme le moment où elle devient épouse. Parmi les épitaphes originaires d'autres régions se laissent distinguer des modèles différents. Dans le cas de l'Etrurie, ces modèles sont des négociations entre des coutumes préromaines et des coutumes romanisées. Le phénomène d' ‘arrondissement d'âge’ est également supposé faire partie de ces concepts de l'âge correct.

Zusammenfassung

Zusammenfassung

Steinerne Epitaphe zeichnen biographische Informationen der Verstorbenen und – in bestimmten Fällen – das Alter zum Zeitpunkt des Todes auf. Es ist jedoch nachgewiesen worden, dass diese Altersangaben auf römischen Epitaphen keine akkurate Widerspiegelung der Sterbedemographie darstellen, sondern kulturell beeinflusst sind. Mittels des Konzeptes des ‘Lebenslaufes’ untersucht der vorliegende Beitrag diese kulturellen Einflüsse und ihre Beziehung zu Strukturen von Alter und Gender. Fundmaterial aus Italien legt nahe, dass diese Einflüsse mit Ideologien von Gender verknüpft sind, mit dem Erwachsenenstatus, der durch den Übergang zum amtsfähigen Alter bei Männern und zur Ehefrau bei Frauen definiert wird. Material anderer Regionen zeigt unterschiedliche Merkmale, und im Falle Etruriens ist dies ein Wandel zwischen vorrömischen und romanisierten Bräuchen. Das Phänomen des ‘gerundeten Alters’ wird ebenfalls als Teil dieser Ideen des korrekten Alters diskutiert.

Keywords

ageage-roundingepitaphsgenderideologylife courseregionalityRomanâgearrondissement de l'âgeépitaphesidéologiecours de la vierégionalitéromainAltergerundetes AlterEpitapheGenderIdeologieLebenslaufRegionalitätRömer
Type
Articles
Information
European Journal of Archaeology , Volume 8 , Issue 1 , 2005 , pp. 43 - 63
Copyright
Copyright © 2005 Sage Publications 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Barker, Graeme and Tom, Rasmussen, 1998. The Etruscans. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.Google Scholar
Bormann, Eugen, 1888. Corpus Inscriptionum Latinarum. Inscriptiones Aemiliae, Etruriae, Umbriae Latinae. Vol. 11 pars 1. Inscriptiones Aemiliae et Etruriae comprehendens. Berlin: Reimer.Google Scholar
CIL (Corpus Inscriptionum Latinarum), 1963. Berlin. (CIL2 refers to the second edition.) For a full listing of volumes see http:/cil.bbaw.de/dateien/cil_baende.html (accessed August 2005).Google Scholar
Dixon, Suzanne, 2001. The ‘other’ Romans and their family values. In Suzanne, Dixon (ed.), Childhood, Class and Kin in the Roman World: 1–17. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Duncan-Jones, Richard P., 1977. Age-rounding, illiteracy and social differentiation in the Roman Empire. Chiron 7:333–353.Google Scholar
Duncan-Jones, Richard P., 1990. Structure and Scale in the Roman Economy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gowland, Rebecca, 2001. Playing dead: implications of mortuary evidence for the social construction of childhood in Roman Britain. In Gwyn, Davies, Andrew, Gardner and Kris, Lockyer (eds), TRAC 2000: Proceedings of the Tenth Annual Theoretical Roman Archaeology Conference, London 2000: 152–168. Oxford: Oxbow Books.Google Scholar
Harkness, Albert G., 1886. Age and marriage at death in the Roman Empire. Transactions of the American Philological Association 27:35–72.Google Scholar
Harlow, Mary and Ray, Laurence, 2002. Growing Up and Growing Old in Ancient Rome. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hencken, Hugh, 1968. Tarquinia and Etruscan Origins. London: Thames & Hudson.Google Scholar
Hope, Valerie, 2001. Constructing Identity: the Roman Funerary Monuments of Aquileia, Mainz and Nimes. Oxford: British Archaeological Reports (International Series 960).Google Scholar
Hopkins, Keith, 1965. The age of Roman girls at marriage. Population Studies 18(3):309–327.Google Scholar
Hopkins, Keith, 1966. On the probable age structure of the Roman population. Population Studies 20(2):245–264.Google Scholar
Hopkins, Keith, 1983. Death and Renewal. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kaimio, Jorma, 1975. The ousting of Etruscan by Latin in Etruria. In Patrick, Bruun, Paavo, Hohti, Jorma, Kaimo, Eva, Michelsen, Marjatta, Nielsen and Eeva, Ruofff-Vaananen (eds), Studies in the Romanization of Etruria: 85–245. Rome: Bardi Editore.Google Scholar
King, Margaret, 2000. Commemoration of infants on Roman funerary inscriptions. In Graham, Oliver (ed.), The Epigraphy of Death: 117–154. Liverpool: Liverpool University Press.Google Scholar
Laurence, Ray, 2000. Metaphors, monuments and texts: the life course in Roman culture. World Archaeology 31:442–455.Google Scholar
Mattingly, David, 2002. Vulgar and weak ‘Romanization’, or time for a paradigm shift? Journal of Roman Archaeology 15:536–541.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McWilliam, Janette, 2001. Children among the dead. The influence of urban life on the commemoration of children on tombstone inscriptions. In Suzanne, Dixon (ed.), Childhood, Class and Kin in the Roman World. 74–98. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Nielsen, Marjatta, 1989. Women and family in a changing society: a quantitative approach to late Etruscan burials. Analecta Romana Instituti Danici 17–18:53–98.Google Scholar
Parkin, Tim, 1992. Demography and Roman Society. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Revell, Louise, 2000. Exploring Roman identities. Case-studies from Spain and Britain. Unpublished , University of Southampton.Google Scholar
RIB (The Roman Inscriptions of Britain), 1965. Inscriptions on Stone. Volume 1. eds Robin, G. Collingwood and Richard, P. Wright. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Saller, Richard P., 1987. Men's age at marriage and its consequences in the Roman family. Classical Philology 82:21–34.Google Scholar
Saller, RICHARD P. and Brent, D. Shaw, 1984. Tombstones and Roman family relations in the Principate: civilians, soldiers and slaves. Journal of Roman Studies 74:124–156.Google Scholar
Scheidel, Walter, 1996. Measuring Sex, Age and Death in the Roman Empire: Exploring in Ancient Demography. Ann Arbor, MI: Journal of Roman Archaeology, Supplementary Series 21.Google Scholar
Scheidel, Walter, 2001. Progress and problems in Roman demography. In Walter, Scheidel (ed.), Debating Roman Demography: 1–81. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Scott, Eleanor, 1995. Women and gender relations in the Roman Empire. In Peter, Rush (ed.), Theoretical Roman Archaeology: Second Conference Proceedings: 174–189. Aldershot: Avebury.Google Scholar
Scott, Eleanor, 1997. Introduction: on the incompleteness of archaeological narratives. In Jenny, Moore and Eleanor, Scott (eds), Invisible People and Processes: Writing Gender and Childhood in European Archaeology: 1–12. Leicester: Leicester University Press.Google Scholar
Shaw, Brent D., 1987. The age of Roman girls at marriage: some reconsiderations. Journal of Roman Studies 77:30–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shaw, Brent D., 1991. The cultural meaning of death: age and gender in the Roman family. In David, I. Kertzer and Richard, P. Saller (eds), The Family in Italy: from Antiquity to Present: 66–90. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Sofaer Derevenski, Joanna, 2000. Rings of life: the role of early metalwork in mediating the gendered life course. World Archaeology 31:389–406.Google Scholar
Van Driel-Murray, Carol, 2002. Ethnic soldiers: the experience of the Lower Rhine tribes. In Thomas, Grünewald and Sandra, Seibel (eds), Kontinuität und Diskontinuität. Germania inferior um Geginn und am Ende der römischen Herrschaft. Beiträge des deutsch-niederländischen Kolloquiums in der Katholieke Universiteit Nijmegen (27. bis 30.06.2001): 200–217. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Wiedemann, Thomas, 1989. Adults and Children in the Roman Empire. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Woolf, Greg, 1996. Monumental writing and the expansion of Roman society in the early empire. Journal of Roman Studies 86:22–39.Google Scholar