Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-s9k8s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-15T23:52:15.533Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Robert Chapman and Alison Wylie . Evidential Reasoning in Archaeology (London: Bloomsbury Academic, 2016, 254 pp., 19 illustr., hbk, ISBN 978-1-4725-2527-7)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 October 2017

Gavin Lucas*
Affiliation:
University of Iceland

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Book Reviews
Copyright
Copyright © European Association of Archaeologists 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Daston, L. & Galison, P. 1997. Objectivity, New York: Zone Books.Google Scholar
Hawkes, C. 1954. Archaeological Theory and Method: Some Suggestions from the Old World. American Anthropologist, 56(2): 155–68.Google Scholar
Latour, B. 1999. Circulating Reference: Sampling the Soil in the Amazon Forest. In: Latour, B., ed. Pandora's Hope: Essays on the Reality of Science Studies. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, pp. 2479.Google Scholar
Longino, H. 2002. The Fate of Knowledge. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Smith, M. 1955. The Limitations of Inference in Archaeology. The Archaeological Newsletter, 6(1): 37.Google Scholar
Toulmin, S. 1958. The Uses of Argument. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wimsatt, W. 1981. Robustness, Reliability, and Overdetermination. In: Brewer, M.B. & Collins, B.E., eds. Scientific Inquiry and the Social Sciences: A Volume in Honor of Donald T. Campbell. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, pp. 124–62.Google Scholar
Wylie, A. 1989. Archaeological Cables and Tacking: Beyond Objectivism and Relativism. Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 19(1): 118.Google Scholar