Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T17:19:34.918Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Ritual Use of Brooches in Early Medieval Forts on Öland, Sweden

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Jan-Henrik Fallgren*
Affiliation:
Kings College, University of Aberdeen, UK
John Ljungkvist*
Affiliation:
Kings College, University of Aberdeen, UK

Abstract

In 2010, the largest find of exquisite gilded silver brooches ever made in Scandinavia came to light during a metal detector survey in a small fort on Öland in the Baltic Sea. It consisted of five hoards buried in five different houses within the fort. The brooches were of the Dreiknopfbügelfbeln/radiate-headed and relief types. Three of the hoards also contained large quantities of beads and pendants, some quite exclusive and rare. In addition, the upper part of another relief brooch probably belonged to a sixth hoard ploughed up in the late nineteenth century. In 2011, Kalmar County Museum excavations at the site of these hoard finds also revealed the traces of a massacre. Though a connection between the deposition of the hoards and the massacre is plausible, several elements suggest that the deposits are ritual in character and unrelated to the attack on the fort. The regular placing of the hoards in the right corner inside the entrance of the houses suggests ritual acts, and the composition of the hoards demonstrates that the deposits are symbolic. We conclude that the hoards and the brooches are props belonging to the interior of the forts and to activities conducted inside them; they may have been worn by some women during rituals. Why these hoards were left in the Sandby fort is, however, no doubt related to its destruction.

En 2010 le plus grand ensemble de fibules en argent doré jamais retrouvé en Scandinavie fut découvert au cours d'une prospection au détecteur de métaux à l'intérieur d'une petite enceinte située sur l’île d’Öland en mer Baltique. Il s'agit de cinq trésors enfouis dans cinq maisons à l'intérieur de l'enceinte. Les fibules sont de types connus sous le nom de Dreiknopfbügelfibeln (fibules à arc et trois boutons) ou des fibules à tête décorée en relief. Trois ensembles contenaient aussi de grandes quantités de perles et de pendentifs, dont certains de type rare. De plus, la partie supérieure d'une autre fibule ornée en relief faisait probablement partie d'un sixième dépôt endommagé par les labours de la fin du dix-neuvième siècle. Les fouilles entreprises par le musée du Comté de Kalmar en 2011 sur l'emplacement de ces trésors ont également relevé les traces d'un massacre. Bien qu'un lien entre les dépôts et le massacre soit possible, plusieurs éléments suggèrent que les dépôts d'objets de parure étaient d'ordre rituel et n’étaient pas liés à l'assaut sur l'enceinte. L'emplacement récurrent des trésors dans l'angle à droite de l'entrée des maisons indique qu'il s'agit d'actes rituels et la composition des ensembles d'objets démontre que ces dépôts remplissaient une fonction symbolique. Nous en concluons que ces trésors et fibules étaient des accessoires faisant partie des enceintes et impliqués dans les activités menées à l'intérieur; peut-être certaines femmes portaient ces parures lors de cérémonie rituelles. Sans doute la destruction de l'enceinte de Sandby a empêché ses habitants de récupérer leurs trésors. Translation by Madeleine Hummler

Der größte Fund von vergoldeten Silberfibeln in Skandinavien wurde in Jahre 2010 in einer kleinen Befestigung auf der Insel Öland in der Ostsee geborgen. Es handelt sich um fünf Schatzfunde, die in fünf verschiedenen Häusern innerhalb der Befestigung von Sandby verborgen waren. Die Fibeln sind Dreiknopfbügelfibeln und Bügelfibeln mit reliefverziertem Kopf. Drei Fundstellen enthielten auch zahlreiche Perlen und Anhänger, darunter einige seltene und außergewöhnliche Exemplare. Der obere Teil einer anderen reliefverzierten Bügelfibel weist auf einen sechsten Schatzfund, der im späten neunzehnten Jahrhundert umgepflügt wurde. In 2011 haben die Ausgrabungen, die das Museum von Kalmar in Bereich der Schatzfunde unternahm, auch die Spuren eines Massakers freigelegt. Obschon man die Deponierung der Schatzfunde mit diesem Massaker in Zusammenhang bringen könnte, weisen verschiedene Umstände eher auf den rituellen Charakter der Deponierungen, also ohne Beziehung auf die Eroberung der Befestigung. Die regelmäßig beobachtete Lage der Schatzfunde im rechten Winkel innerhalb der Hauseingänge deutet auf rituelle Handlungen, und die Zusammenstellung der Befunde zeigt, dass die Deponierung symbolisch war. Wir kommen zum Schluss, dass die Schatzfunde und Fibeln als Requisiten der Tätigkeiten innerhalb der Befestigungen dienten; möglicherweise waren sie von gewissen Frauen getragen, vielleicht bei bestimmten rituellen Gelegenheiten. Die Zerstörung der Befestigung von Sandby ist sehr wahrscheinlich für die Aufgabe der Schatzfunde verantwortlich. Translation by Madeleine Hummler

Type
Article
Copyright
Copyright © 2016 the European Association of Archaeologists 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Åberg, N. 1923. Kalmar läns förhistoria. Uppsala: Almqvist & Wiksell.Google Scholar
Andrén, A. 2006. A World of Stone: Warrior Culture, Hybridity, and Old Norse Cosmology. In: Andrén, A., Jennbert, K. and Raudvere, C., eds. Ordning mot kaos: Studier av nordisk förkristen kosmologi. Lund: Nordic Academic Press, pp. 3338.Google Scholar
Andrén, A. 2014. Tracing Old Norse Cosmology. The World Tree, Middle Earth, and the Sun in Archaeological Perspectives. Lund: Nordic Academic Press.Google Scholar
Backe, M., Edgren, B. & Herschend, F. 1993. Bones Thrown into a Water-Hole. In: Arwidsson, G., Hansson, A.-M., Holmquist Olausson, L., Johansson, B.M., Klockhoff, M., Lidén, K. and Nordström, H., eds. Sources and Resources: Studies in Honour of Birgit Arrhenius. Rixensart: PACT, pp. 327–42.Google Scholar
Beskow, M. 1972. Glimtar ur Sandby och Gårdbys forntid. In: Palm, B., ed. En bok om Sandby och Gårdby socknar. Sandby-Gårdby Hembygdsförening: Kalmar.Google Scholar
Bhreathnach, E. 2011. Transforming Kingship and Cult: The Provincial Ceremonial Capitals in Early Medieval Ireland. In: Schot, R., Newman, C. and Bhreathnach, E., eds. Landscapes of Cult and Kingship. Dublin: Four Courts, pp. 126–48.Google Scholar
Bliujienė, A. 2002. The Main Stylistic Features of the Baltic Crossbow Brooches in the Migration Period. Archaeologia Baltica, 5: 145–61.Google Scholar
Blohmé, M., Fallgren, J.-H. & Bäckström, Y. 2011. Sandby borg på Öland – fem depåfynd av praktspännen från folkvandringstid. Länsstyrelsen Kalmar. Unpublished report 2011:10.Google Scholar
Bowden, M. & McOmish, D. 1987. The Required Barrier. Scottish Archaeological Review, 4: 7684.Google Scholar
Brown, I. 2009. Beacons in the Landscape. The Hillforts of England and Wales. Bollington: Windgather Press.Google Scholar
Brunaux, J.-L. & Rapin, A. 1994. Gournay II: Boucliers et lances, dépôts et trophées. Paris: Éditions Errance.Google Scholar
Bryant, S. 2007. Central Places or Special Places? The Origin and Development of “Oppida” in Hertfordshire. In: Haselgrove, C. and Pope, R., eds. The Earlier Iron Age in Britain and the Near Continent. Oxford: Oxbow, pp. 6280.Google Scholar
Byrne, F.J. 2001. Irish Kings and High-Kings. Dublin: Four Courts Press.Google Scholar
Campbell, E. 2003. Royal Inauguration in Dál Riata and the Stone of Destiny. In: Wellander, R., Breeze, D. and Clancy, T., eds. The Stone of Destiny: Artefact and Icon. Edinburgh: Society of Antiquaries of Scotland, pp. 4359.Google Scholar
Cassel, K. 1998. Från grav till gård. Romersk järnålder. Stockholm Studies in Archaeology 16. Stockholm: Stockholms universitet.Google Scholar
Charles-Edwards, T.M. 2000. Early Christian Ireland. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Charles-Edwards, T.M. 2005. Introduction: Prehistoric and early Ireland. In: Cróinín, D.Ó., ed. A New History of Ireland I. Prehistoric and Early Ireland. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. Ivii–Ixxxii.Google Scholar
Charles-Edwards, T.M. 2013. Wales and the Britons, 350–1064. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Collinder, B. 1957. Den poetiska Eddan (Edda Sæmundar). Stockholm: Forum.Google Scholar
Cunliffe, B. 2001. Facing the Ocean. The Atlantic and its peoples, 8000 BC–AD 1500. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Doherty, C. 2005. Kingship in Early Ireland. In: Bhreatnach, E., ed. The Kingship and Landscape of Tara. Dublin: Four Courts, pp. 331.Google Scholar
Dowling, G. 2006. The Liminal Boundary: An Analysis of the Sacral Potency of the Ditch of Ráith na Rìg, Tara, Co. Meath. The Journal of Irish Archaeology, 15: 1537.Google Scholar
Dowling, G. 2011. The Architecture of Power: An Exploration of the Origins of Closely Spaced Multivallate Monuments in Ireland. In: Schot, R., Newman, C. and Bhreathnach, E., eds. Landscapes of Cult and Kingship. Dublin: Four Courts, pp. 213–31.Google Scholar
Driscoll, S.T. 2004. The Archaeological Context of Assembly in Early Medieval Scotland: Scone and its Comparanda. In: Pantos, A. and Semple, S., eds. Assembly Places and Practices in Medieval Europe. Dublin: Four Courts, pp. 7394.Google Scholar
Driscoll, S.T. 2009. Ad Gefrin and Scotland: The Implications of the Yeavering Excavations for the North. In: Frodsham, P. and O'Brien, C., eds. Yeavering. People, Power & Place. Stroud: The History Press, pp. 161–73.Google Scholar
Edberg, R. 2008. Heliga hägnader. Ett inlägg om Sigtuna, tunaproblemet och fornborgarna. Situne Dei, 2006: 4767.Google Scholar
Fabech, C. & Näsman, U. 2013. Ritual Landscapes and Sacral Places in the First Millennium AD in South Scandinavia. In: Nordeide, S.W. and Brink, S., eds. Sacred Sites and Holy Places: Exploring the Sacralization of Landscape through Time and Space. Turnhout: Brepols, pp. 53109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fallgren, J.-H. 2006. Kontinuitet och förändring. Bebyggelse och samhälle på Öland 200–1300 e Kr. Aun 35. Uppsala: Department of Archaeology and Ancient History, Uppsala University.Google Scholar
Fallgren, J.-H. 2008. Fornborgar, bebyggelse och odlingslandskap. In: Tegnér, G., ed. Gråborg på Öland. Om en borg, ett kapell och en by. Stockholm: Kungl. Vitterhets Historie och Antikvitets Akademien, pp. 119–36.Google Scholar
Fallgren, J.-H. 2009. The Ölandic Ring-Forts and the Iron Age and Medieval Agricultural Landscapes. In: Segschneider, M., ed. Ringvälle und verwandte Strukturen des ersten Jahrtausends n. Chr. an Nord- und Ostsee. Internationales Symposium Utersum auf Föhr 29. September–1. Oktober 2005. Schriften des Archäologischen Landesmuseums. Ergänzungsreihe Band 5. 5: Neunünster, pp. 2750.Google Scholar
Fallgren, J.-H., Blohmé, M. & Bäckström, Y. 2011. Mossberga borg, Högsrum. Forskningsprojekt, Metalldetektor kartering. Mossberga 1:1, Högsrum sn, Mossberga borg, Fornlämning 84:1, Borholms komun, Öland, Länsstyrelsen Kalmar. Unpublished report 2011: 6.Google Scholar
Fraser, J.E. 2009. From Caledonia to Pictland: Scotland to 795. The New Edinburgh History of Scotland 1. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Frodsham, P. 2009. “The Stronghold of its Native Past”. Some Thoughts on the Past in the Past at Yeavering. In: Frodsham, P. and ÓBrien, C., eds. Yeavering. People, Power & Place. Stroud: The History Press, pp. 1364.Google Scholar
Gihl, G. 1918. Upplands fornborgar: En antikvarisk-topografisk beskrivning. Upplands fornminnesförenings tidskrift, 8/33–35: 3388.Google Scholar
Gleeson, P. 2012. Constructing Kingship in Early Medieval Ireland: Power, Place and Ideology. Medieval Archaeology, 56: 133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamilton, J.R.C. 1968. Excavations at Clickhimin, Shetland. Edinburgh: HMSO.Google Scholar
Harding, D.W. 2012. Iron Age Hillforts in Britain & Beyond. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Haselgrove, C. 2000. The Character of Oppida in Iron Age Britain. In: Guichard, V., Sievers, S. and Urban, O.H., eds. Les processus d'urbanisation á l’âge du fer. Collection Bibracte 4. 4: Glux-en-Glenne, pp. 103–10.Google Scholar
Haseloff, G. 1981. Die germanische Tierornamentik der Völkerwanderungszeit. Studien zu Salin's Stil I. Volumes I–III. Berlin & New York: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Hegardt, J. 1991. Det patrilaterala samhället, hemliga sällskap och monumentala byggnader: en analys av en gotländsk fornborg. Tor, 23: 5584.Google Scholar
Hemmendorff, O. 1985. The Hillfort at Frösön in a North Scandinavian Perspective. Archaeology and Environment, 4: 235–46.Google Scholar
Henderson, J.C. 2007. Atlantic Iron Age. Settlement and identity in the first millennium BC. London & New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Herring, P. 1994. The Cliff Castles and Hillforts of West Penwith in Light of Recent Work at Maen Castle and Treryn Dinas. Cornish Archaeology, 33: 4056.Google Scholar
Herrmann, F.-R. 1998. Keltisches Heiligtum am Glauberg in Hessen. Ein Neufund frühkeltischer Großplastik. Antike Welt, 29: 345–48.Google Scholar
Herrmann, F.-R. 2005. Olympia des Nordens oder unvollendete Stadtgründung? In: Biel, J. and Krausse, D., eds. Frühkeltische Fürstensitze. Älteste Städte und Herrschaftszentren nördlich der Alpen? Internationaler Workshop Eberdingen-Hochdorf 12.–13. September 2003. Archäologische Informationen aus Baden-Württemberg, 51. Esslingen: Landesamt für Denkmalpflege, pp. 1827.Google Scholar
Hilberg, V. 2009. Masurische Bügelfibeln: Studien zu den Fernbeziehungen der völkerwanderungszeitlichen Brandgräber felder von Daumen und Kellaren. Neumünster: Wachholtz.Google Scholar
Hill, J.D. 1995. How Should We Understand Iron Age Societies and Hill-Forts? A Contextual Study from Southern Britain. In: Hill, J.D. and Cumberpatch, C.G., eds. Different Iron Ages. Studies in Temperate Europe. British Archaeological Reports International Series, 602. 602: Oxford, pp. 4566.Google Scholar
Hines, J. 1989. Ritual Hoarding in Migration-Period Scandinavia: A Review of Recent Interpretations. Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society, 55: 193206.Google Scholar
Holdar, C.-G. 1979. The Shaping of the Landscape of Eketorp. Geology and Hydrology. In: Näsman, U. and Wegraeus, E., eds. Eketorp. Fortification and Settlement on Öland/Sweden. The Setting. Stockholm: Royal Academy of Letters, History and Antiquities.Google Scholar
Isaksson, S. 2005. Food for the Gods. An Analysis of the Organic Residues from the Havor Hoard. In: Nylén, E., Lund Hansen, U. and Manneke, P., eds. The Havor Hoard. The Gold – The Bronzes – The Fort. Stockholm: Kungl. Vitterhets Historie och Antikvitets Akademien, pp. 145–57.Google Scholar
Iversen, M. & Näsman, U. 1978. Smykkefund fra Eketorp-II. KUML, 1978: 8599.Google Scholar
Johansen, B. 1997. Ormalur: Aspekter av tillvaro och landskap. Stockholm Studies in Archaeology, 4. Stockholm: Akademitryck.Google Scholar
Kelly, F. 2000 (1997). Early Irish Farming. Dublin: Dublin Institute for Advanced Studies.Google Scholar
Klindt-Jensen, O. 1957. Bornholm i folkevandringstiden: og forudsaetningerne i tidlig jernalder, volume 2. København: Nationalmuseet.Google Scholar
Larsson, L. 1981. Gräber und Siedlungsreste der jüngeren Eisenzeit bei Önsvala im südwestlichen Schonen. Acta archaeologica Kobenhavn, 52: 129208.Google Scholar
Lindqvist, S. 1923. Hednatemplet i Uppsala. Fornvännen, 1923: 193219.Google Scholar
Ljungkvist, J. 2010. Influences from the Empire: Byzantine-Related Objects in Sweden and Scandinavia 560/70–750/800 AD. In: Daim, F. and Drauschke, J., eds. Byzanz – Das Römerreich im Mittelalter 3: Peripherie und Nachbarschaft. Monographien des Römisch-Germanischen Zentralmuseums 84/3. 3: Mainz, pp. 419–41.Google Scholar
MacCotter, P. 2008. Medieval Ireland. Territorial, Political and Economic Divisions. Dublin: Four Courts.Google Scholar
MacCotter, P. 2012. Drong and Dál as Synonyms for Óenach. Peritia, 22: 16.Google Scholar
Magnus, B. 1999. Monsters and Birds of Prey. Some Reflections on Form and Style of the Migration Period. In: Dickinson, T. and Griffiths, D., eds. Anglo-Saxon Studies in Archaeology and History 10: The Making of Kingdoms. Oxford: Oxford University Committee for Archaeology, pp. 161–72.Google Scholar
Magnus, B. 2002. Ørnen flyr – om Stil I i Norden. Hikuin, 29: 105–18.Google Scholar
Magnus, B. 2004. Brooches on the Move in Migration Period Europe. Fornvännen, 99: 273–82.Google Scholar
Marstrander, S. 1958. Bygdeborgene – vore eldste militaere anlegg. Trondheim: Det kgl. norske videnskapsselskabets årbog.Google Scholar
McCormick, F. 2009. Ritual Feasting in Iron Age Ireland. In: Cooney, G., Coles, J., Ryan, M. and Sievers, S., eds. Relics of Old Decency: Archaeological Studies in Later Prehistory: Festschrift for Barry Raftery. Dublin: Wordwell, pp. 405–12.Google Scholar
Myrberg, N. 2005. Burning Down the House. Mythological Chaos and World Order on Gotlandic Picture Stones. Current Swedish Archaeology, 13: 99119.Google Scholar
Näsman, U. 1984. Zwei Relieffibeln von der Insel Öland. Praehistorische Zeitschrift, 59/1: 4880.Google Scholar
Nerman, B. 1935. Die Völkerwanderungszeit Gotlands. Stockholm: Verlag der Akademie.Google Scholar
Newman, C. 1997. Tara: An Archaeological Survey. Discovery Programme Monographs 2. Dublin: Royal Irish Academy.Google Scholar
Newman, C. 2007. Procession and Symbolism at Tara: Analysis of Tech Midchúarta (the “Banqueting Hall”) in Context of the Sacral Campus. Oxford Journal of Archaeology, 26: 415–38.Google Scholar
Newman, C. 2011. The Sacral Landscape of Tara: A Preliminary Exploration. In: Schot, R., Newman, C. and Bhreathnach, E., eds. Landscapes of Cult and Kingship. Dublin: Four Courts, pp. 2243.Google Scholar
van der Noort, R., Chapman, H. & Collis, J. 2007. Sutton Common. The Excavation of an Iron Age “marsh fort”. CBA Research Report 154. York: Council for British Archaeology.Google Scholar
Nylén, E. 1962. Skatten från Havors fornborg. In: Proxima Thule. Sverige och Europa under forntid och medeltid. Hyllning stidskrift till H. M. Konungen den 11 november 1962. 1962: Stockholm, pp. 94112.Google Scholar
Nylén, E. 2005. The Gold Neckring. In: Nylén, E., Lund Hansen, U. and Manneke, P., eds. The Havor Hoard. The Gold – The Bronzes – The Fort. Stockholm: Kungl. Vitterhets Historie och Antikvitets Akademien, pp. 1151.Google Scholar
Ó Floinn, R. 2000. Freestone Hill, Co. Kilkenny: A Reassessment. In: Smyth, A.P., ed. Seanchas: Studies in Early and Medieval Irish Archaeology, History and Literature in Honour of Francis J. Byrne. Dublin: Four Courts, pp. 1229.Google Scholar
O'Sullivan, A., McCormick, F., Kerr, T.K. & Lorcan, H. 2014. Early Medieval Ireland AD 400–1100. The Evidence from Archaeological Excavations. Dublin: Royal Irish Academy.Google Scholar
Oswald, A. & Pearson, T. 2009 (2005). Yeavering Bell Hillfort. In: Frodsham, P. and O'Brien, C., eds. Yeavering. People, Power & Place. Stroud: The History Press, pp. 98126.Google Scholar
Rudebeck, E. & Ödman, C. 2000. Kristineberg: en gravplats under 4500 år. Malmöfynd 7. Malmö: Stadsantikvariska avdelningen, Kultur Malmö.Google Scholar
Rynne, E. 1992. Dûn Aengus and Some Similar Celtic Ceremonial Centres. In: Bernelle, A., ed. Decantations: A Tribute to Maurice Craig. Dublin: Lilliput Press, pp. 196207.Google Scholar
Sharpe, A. 1992. Treryn Dinas: Cliff Castles Reconsidered. Cornish Archaeology, 31: 6568.Google Scholar
Slupecki, L.P. 1994. Slavonic Pagan Sanctuaries. Warsaw: Institute of Archaeology and Ethnology, Polish Academy of Sciences.Google Scholar
Stenberger, M. 1925. En preliminär undersökning av Ismantorps borg. Fornvännen, 20: 358–75.Google Scholar
Stenberger, M. 1933. Öland under äldre järnåldern. Stockholm: Kungl. Vitterhets Historie och Antikvitets Akademien.Google Scholar
Straume, E. 1987. Gläser mit Facettenschliff aus skandinavischen Gräbern des 4. und 5. Jahrhunderts n. Chr. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.Google Scholar
Strömberg, M. 1961. Untersuchungen zur jüngeren Eisenzeit in Schonen: Völkerwanderungzeit-Wikingerzeit. Acta archaeologica Lundensi. Series in 4o, 4. Bonn & Lund: Rudolf Habelt & C.W.K Gleerups.Google Scholar
Viberg, A. 2012. Sandby borg. Teknisk rapport magnetometerprospektering av Sandby borg, RAÄ 45:1, Öland, Sverige. Rapporter från Arkeologiska forskningslaboratoriet 19. Stockholm: Stockholms Universitet.Google Scholar
Victor, H. 2011. Arkeologisk rapport – Sandby borg. Kalmar länsmuseum. Unpublished report.Google Scholar
Waddell, J. 2014. Archaeology and Celtic Myth. Dublin: Four Courts.Google Scholar
Wall, Å. 2002. Borderline Viewpoints. The Early Iron Age Landscapes of Henged Mountains in East Central Sweden. Current Swedish Archaeology, 10: 95114.Google Scholar
Wall, Å. 2003. De hägnade bergens landskap: Om den äldre järnåldern på Södertörn. Stockholm Studies in Archaeology, 27. Stockholm: Stockholms Universitet.Google Scholar
Warner, R. 2004. Notes on the Inception and Early Development of the Royal Mound in Ireland. In: Pantos, A. and Semple, S., eds. Assembly Places and Practices in Medieval Europe. Dublin: Four Courts, pp. 2743.Google Scholar
Waterbolk, H.T. 1977. Walled Enclosures of the Iron Age in the North of the Netherlands. Palaeohistoria, 19: 97172.Google Scholar
Watson, W.J. 2004. The Celtic Place-Names of Scotland. Edinburgh: Birlinn.Google Scholar
Wegraeus, E. 1976. The Öland Ring Forts. In: Borg, K., Näsman, U. and Wegraeus, E., eds. Eketorp: Fortification and Settlement on Öland/Sweden. Part I: The Monument. Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell, pp. 3344.Google Scholar
Westropp, T.J. 1910. Promontory Forts and Similar Structures in County Kerry. The Journal of the Royal Society of Antiquaries of Ireland, Series 5, 20: 267–74.Google Scholar
Woodward, A. 1992. The English Heritage Book of Shrines and Sacrifices. London: Batsford.Google Scholar
Woolf, A. 2007. From Pictland to Alba, 789–1070. The New Edinburgh History of Scotland 2. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Ystgaard, I. 2014. Krigens praksis. Organisert voldsbruk og materiell kultur i Midt-Norge ca. 100–900 e.Kr. NTNU doctoral dissertation, Trondheim [accessed 20 November 2015]. Available at: <http://brage.bibsys.no/xmlui/handle/11250/243149>..>Google Scholar