Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T08:23:29.595Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Produce, Repair, Reuse, Adapt, and Recycle: The Multiple Biographies of a Roman Barrel

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 March 2020

Rob Sands Open the ORCID record for Rob Sands [Opens in a new window]  and
Elise Marlière Open the ORCID record for Elise Marlière [Opens in a new window]
Rob Sands
Affiliation:
School of Archaeology, University College Dublin, Ireland
Elise Marlière
Affiliation:
Antiquarium-Ibiza, Spain, and UMR 7041, University of Paris X, France
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

By the time the Roman empire reached its greatest extent, in the early decades of the second century ad, wooden barrels were a key part of a trade network that supported a complex extended economy. These objects do not, however, routinely survive in the archaeological record and very few sites have yielded large, multi-phase, assemblages for study. Although relatively rare, individual finds and assemblages have been found sufficiently regularly to allow us to consider barrel production and use during the Roman period. These objects can have complex cultural biographies from their original production to their final deposition. Current and previous research at Vindolanda, a Roman fort in northern Britain at the edge of the Roman empire, provides a context for reflection on these objects and their biographies. Emphasis is given to whether this material demonstrates repeated, possibly habituated, practices of adaption and recycling.

Au cours des premières décennies du second siècle apr. J.-C., alors que l'empire romain était à son apogée, les tonneaux en bois étaient un élément essentiel d'un réseau de commerce à la base d'un système économique complexe et étendu. Cependant ces objets ne sont normalement pas conservés en archéologie et peu de sites ont livré des ensembles suffisamment grands et provenant de plusieurs phases. Quoique relativement rares, des trouvailles individuelles et des ensembles ont été recueillis de façon suffisamment régulière pour permettre un examen de la production et de l'usage des tonneaux à l’époque romaine. Ces objets peuvent avoir une biographie culturelle complexe, allant de leur lieu de production jusqu’à leur déposition finale. Les recherches menées récemment et antérieurement à Vindolanda, un fort romain du nord de la Grande-Bretagne aux confins de l'empire romain, fournissent un cadre de réflexion sur ces objets et leurs biographies. Ici nous mettons l'accent sur les indices qui démontrent une pratique réitérée, peut-être habituellement répétée, d'adaptation et de recyclage perceptible dans ce matériel. Translation by Madeleine Hummler

In den ersten Jahrzehnten des 2. Jahrhunderts n. Chr., als das römische Reich am ausgedehntesten war, spielten die Holzfässer eine wichtige Rolle in einem Handelsnetzwerk, das eine Komplexe und weitreichende förderte. Diese Gegenstände sind aber normalerweise in den archäologischen Befunden nicht erhalten und es gibt nur wenige Fundstellen mit umfangreichen mehrphasigen Sammlungen. Obschon sie recht selten vorkommen, sind Einzelfunde und Sammlungen von Fässern regelmäßig genug gefunden worden, um eine Untersuchung der Herstellung und Gebrauchs von Fässern in der Römerzeit zu erlauben. Diese Gegenstände können eine komplexe kulturelle Biografie haben, die vom ursprünglichen Herstellungsort bis zur endgültigen Deponierung reichen. Laufende und abgeschlossene Untersuchungen in Vindolanda, ein Kastell in Nordbritannien am Rande des römischen Reiches, geben uns die Gelegenheit, über diese Gegenstände und deren Biografien nachzudenken. Hier erwägen wir besonders, ob man in diesem Material eine mehrfache, vielleicht gewöhnlich wiederholte Praxis der Anpassung und Wiederverwertung nachweisen kann. Translation by Madeleine Hummler

Keywords

Roman periodcooperageAbies albaPicea abiesLarix deciduaobject biographyrecyclingépoque romainetonnellerieAbies albaPicea abiesLarix deciduabiographie d'objets recyclageRömerzeitKüfereiAbies albaPicea abiesLarix deciduaBiografie eines GegenstandesWiederverwertung
Type
Article
Information
European Journal of Archaeology , Volume 23 , Issue 3 , August 2020 , pp. 356 - 380
Copyright
Copyright © European Association of Archaeologists 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abdelhamid, S. 2013. Against the Throw-away-mentality: The Reuse of Amphoras in Ancient Maritime Transport. In: Hahn, H.P. & Weiss, H., eds. Mobility, Meaning, and the Transformations of Things. Oxford & Oakville (CT): Oxbow Books, pp. 91–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anagnost, S.E., Meyer, R.W. & De Zeeuw, C.D. 1994. Confirmation and Significance of Bartholin's Method for the Identification of the Wood of Picea and Larix. International Association of Wood Anatomists (IAWA) Journal, 15: 171–84.Google Scholar
Auriemma, R. 2000. Le anfore del relitto di Grado e il loro contenuto. Mélanges de l'école française de Rome, Antiquité, 112: 27–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Austin, J. 2015. Letter Writing at Vindolanda (Northumberland/GB). In: Scholz, M. & Horster, M., eds. Lesen und Schreiben in den römischen Provinzen. Mainz: Römisch-Germanisches Zentralmuseum, pp. 15–26.Google Scholar
Ayre, J. & Wroe-Brown, R. 2015. The Eleventh- and Twelfth-century Waterfront and Settlement at Queenhithe: Excavations at Bull Wharf, City of London. Archaeological Journal, 172: 195–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bakels, C. & Jacomet, S. 2003. Access to Luxury Foods in Central Europe during the Roman Period: The Archaeobotanical Evidence. World Archaeology, 34: 542–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Batholin, T. 1979. The Picea-Larix Problem. International Association of Wood Anatomists Bulletin, 1: 68–70.Google Scholar
Benguerel, S., Brem, H., Ebneter, I., Ferrer, M., Hartmann, B., Leuzinger, U., et al. 2012. Tasgetium II. Die römischen Holzfunde (Archäologie im Thurgau 18). Frauenfeld: Department für Erziehung und Kultur des Kantons Thurgau.Google Scholar
Bevan, A. 2014. Mediterranean Containerization. Current Anthropology, 55: 387–418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Birley, A. 2002. Garrison Life at Vindolanda: A Band of Brothers. Stroud: Tempus.Google Scholar
Birley, A., Meyer, A. & Greene, E.M. 2016. Recent Discoveries in the Fort and Extramural Settlement at Vindolanda: Excavations from 2009–2015. Britannia, 47: 243–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Birley, R. 2009. Vindolanda: A Roman Fort on Hadrian's Wall. Stroud: Amberley.Google Scholar
Blurton, T.W. 1977. Excavations at Angel Court, Walbrook, 1974. Transactions of the London and Middlesex Archaeological Society, 28: 14–100.Google Scholar
Boon, G.C. 1974. Silchester: The Roman Town of Calleva. Newton Abbot: David & Charles.Google Scholar
Boon, G.C. 1975. Segontium 50 Years On: A Roman Stave of Larchwood and Other Unpublished Finds Mainly of Organic Materials, Together with a Note on Late Barracks. Archaeologia Cambrensis, 124: 52–67.Google Scholar
Bowman, A.K. 1994. Life and Letters on the Roman Frontier: Vindolanda and its People. London: British Museum Press.Google Scholar
Bowman, A.K. & Thomas, J.D. 1983. Vindolanda: The Latin Writing-tablets. London: Society for the Promotion of Roman Studies.Google Scholar
Bowman, A.K & Thomas, J.D. 1994. The Vindolanda Writing Tablets II (Tabulae Vindolandenses II). London: British Museum Press.Google Scholar
Casparie, W.A. 1978. Über die Holzarten der zwei römerzeitlichen Fässer von Rijswijk. In: Bloemers, J.H.F., ed. Rijswijk (Z.H.), ‘De Bult’. Eine Siedlung der Cananefaten (Nederlandse Oudheden, 8). Amersfoort: Rijksdienst voor Oudheidkundig Bodemonderzoek, pp. 438–46.Google Scholar
Caudullo, G., Tinner, W. & De Rigo, D. 2016. Picea abies in Europe: Distribution, Habitat, Usage, and Threats. In: San-Miguel-Ayanz, J., De Rigo, D., Caudullo, G., Houston Durrant, T. & Mauri, A., eds. European Atlas of Forest Tree Species. Luxembourg: European Commission, pp. 114–16.Google Scholar
Chabal, L. & Feugère, M. 2005. Le mobilier organique des puits antiques et autres contextes humides de Lattara. In: Piquès, G. & Buxó, R., eds. Onze puits gallo-romains de Lattara (Ier s. av. n. è. - IIe s. de n. è.). Fouilles programmées 1986–2000. Lattes: Association pour la recherche archéologique en Languedoc oriental, pp. 137–88.Google Scholar
Clerici, R. 1983. Römische Holzfässer aus Vitodurum. Helvetica Archaeologia, 53/14, 14–24.Google Scholar
Comey, M.G. 2003. Stave-Built Wooden Vessels from Medieval Ireland. The Journal of Irish Archaeology, 12/13: 33–77.Google Scholar
Comey, M.G. 2010. Coopers and Coopering in Viking Age Dublin (Medieval Dublin Excavations 1962–81, series B, vol. 10). Dublin: Royal Irish Academy.Google Scholar
Comey, M.G. 2013. The Wooden Drinking Vessels in the Sutton Hoo Assemblage: Materials, Morphology, and Usage. In: Bintley, M.D.J. & Shapland, M.G., eds. Trees and Timber in the Anglo-Saxon World. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 107–121.Google Scholar
Cook, J.M. 2004. Early Anglo-Saxon Buckets. Oxford: Oxford University School of Archaeology.Google Scholar
Cooney, G. 2016. Material Culture. In: Gardner, A., Lake, M. & Sommer, U., eds. The Oxford Handbook of Archaeological Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 1–31.Google Scholar
Da Ronch, F., Caudullo, G., Tinner, W. & De Rigo, D. 2016. Larix decidua and Other Larches in Europe: Distribution, Habitat, Usage, and Threats. In: San-Miguel-Ayanz, J., De Rigo, D., Caudullo, G., Houston Durrant, T. & Mauri, A., eds. European Atlas of Forest Tree Species. Luxembourg: European Commission, pp 108–10.Google Scholar
Desbat, A. 1997. Le tonneau antique: questions techniques et problème d'origine. In: Garcia, D. & Meeks, D., eds. Techniques et économie antiques et rnedievales. Le temps de l'innovation. Paris: Errance, pp. 113–20.Google Scholar
Driel-Murray, C.V. 2011. Are We Missing Something? The Elusive Tanneries of the Roman Period. In: Thomson, R., & Mould, Q., eds. Archaeological Leather Group's Conference ‘ Have We Got a Tannery? The Archaeology of the Skin Processing Industries'. London: Archetype Press, pp. 69–83.Google Scholar
Earwood, C. 1993. Domestic Wooden Artefacts: In Britain and Ireland from the Neolithic to Viking Times. Exeter: University of Exeter Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edlin, H.L. 1973. Woodland Crafts in Britain: An Account of the Traditional Uses of Trees and Timbers in the British Countryside. Newton Abbot: David & Charles.Google Scholar
Etter, H.F., Brogli, R.F., Fellmann, R., Martin-Kilcher, S., Morel, P. & Rast, A. 1991. Beiträge zum römischen Oberwinterthur. Vitudurum 5, Teil A: Die Funde aus Holz, Leder, Bein. Gewebe. Zürich: Orell Füssli.Google Scholar
Fellmann, R. 2009. Römische Kleinfunde aus Holz aus dem Legionslager Vindonissa (Veröffentlichung der Gesellschaft Pro Vindonissa, 20). Brugg: Pro Vindonissa.Google Scholar
Fleming, R. 2012. Recycling in Britain after the Fall of Rome's Metal Economy. Past & Present, 217: 3–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foster, W. 1944. The Coopers' Company: A Short History of the Worshipful Company of Coopers of London. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Freestone, I.C. 2015. The Recycling and Reuse of Roman Glass: Analytical Approaches. Journal of Glass Studies, 57: 29–40.Google Scholar
Frei-Stolba, R. 2017. Holzfässer: Studien zu den Holzfässern und ihren Inschriften im römischen Reich mit Neufunden und Neulesungen der Fassinschriften aus Oberwinterthur. Zürich: Baudirektion Kanton Zürich, Amt für Raumentwicklung, Kantonsarchäologie.Google Scholar
Frison, E. 1961. Examen anatomique des bois du puits romain n˚ I de Harelbeke. Latomus, 20: 800–05.Google Scholar
Gibson, J.J. 1979. The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
Goodburn, D.M. 2016. The Manufacture of Waxed Stylus Writing Tablets in Roman London. In: Tomlin, R.S.O., ed. Roman London's First Voices: Writing Tablets from the Bloomberg Excavations, 2010–2014 (MOLA Monograph 72). London: Museum of London Archaeology, pp. 8–13.Google Scholar
Gosden, C. & Marshall, Y. 1999. The Cultural Biography of Objects. World Archaeology, 31: 169–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hahn, H.P. & Weiss, H. 2013. Introduction: Biographies, Travels, and Itineraries of Things. In: Hahn, H.P. & Weiss, H., eds. Mobility, Meaning, and the Transformations of Things. Oxford & Oakville (CT): Oxbow Books, pp. 1–14.Google Scholar
Hartmann, B. 2015. Die hölzernen Schreibtafeln im Imperium Romanum – ein Inventar. In: Scholz, M. & Horster, M., eds. Lesen und Schreiben in den römischen Provinzen. Mainz: Römisch-Germanisches Zentralmuseum, pp. 43–58.Google Scholar
Hather, J.G. 2000. The Identification of the Northern European Woods: A Guide for Archaeologists and Conservators. London: Archetype Press.Google Scholar
Hicks, D. & Beaudry, M.C. 2010. Introduction: Material Culture Studies, a Reactionary View. In: Hicks, D. & Beaudry, M.C., eds. The Oxford Handbook of Material Culture Studies. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 1–21.Google Scholar
Hodder, I. 2014. The Entanglements of Humans and Things: A Long-Term View. New Literary History, 45: 19–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hodder, I. & Lucas, G. 2017. The Symmetries and Asymmetries of Human–Thing Relations: A Dialogue. Archaeological Dialogues, 24: 119–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hopf, M. 1967. Einige Bemerkungen zu römerzeitlichen Fässern. Jahrbuch des römisch-germanischen Zentralmuseums Mainz, 14, 212–216.Google Scholar
Horn, J. 2015. Tankards of the British Iron Age. Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society, 81: 311–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
IAWA Commitee 1989. IAWA List of Microscopic Features for Softwood Identification. International Association of Wood Anatomists (IAWA) Journal, 25: 1–25.Google Scholar
Joy, J. 2009. Reinvigorating Object Biography: Reproducing the Drama of Object Lives. World Archaeology, 41: 540–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Joyce, R.A. & Gillespie, S.D. eds. 2015. Things in Motion: Object Itineraries in Anthropological Practice. Santa Fe (AZ): School for Advanced Research.Google Scholar
Kilby, K. 1971. The Cooper and his Craft. London: J. Baker.Google Scholar
Knappett, C. 2005. The Affordance of Things: A Post-Gibsonian Perspective on the Relationality of Mind and Matter. In: Demarrais, E., Gosden, C. & Renfrew, C., eds. Rethinking Materiality: The Engagement of Mind with the Material World. Cambridge: MacDonald Institute for Archaeological Research, pp. 43–51.Google Scholar
Kopytoff, I. 1986. The Cultural Biography of Things: Commoditization as Process. In: Appadurai, A., ed. The Social Life of Things: Commodities in Cultural Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 64–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kühlborn, J.-S. 1992. Das Römerlager in Oberaden III. Münster: Aschendorff.Google Scholar
Küster, H. 1994. The Economic Use of Abies Wood as Timber in Central Europe during Roman times. Vegetation History and Archaeobotany, 3: 25–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Linnane, J.L. & Kinsella, J. 2009. Military Lords and Defensive Beginnings: A Preliminary Assessment of the Social Role of an Impressive Rath at Baronstown. In: Deevy, M.B. & Murphy, D., eds. Places Along the Way: First Findings on the M3. Dublin: National Roads Authority, pp. 101–22.Google Scholar
Lodwick, L.A. 2017. Evergreen Plants in Roman Britain and Beyond: Movement, Meaning, and Materiality. Britannia, 48: 135–73. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0068113X17000101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mair, C. 2013. The History of the Incorporation of Coopers of Glasgow. Glasgow: Neil Wilson.Google Scholar
Malafouris, L. 2013. How Things Shape the Mind: A Theory of Material Engagement. Cambridge (MA): MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marchand, T.H.J. 2010. Embodied Cognition and Communication: Studies with British Fine Woodworkers. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 16, S100–S120. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9655.2010.01612.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marlière, E. 2001. Le tonneau en Gaule romaine. Gallia, 58: 181–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marlière, E. 2002. L'outre et le tonneau dans l'Occident romain (Monographies Instrumentum). Montagnac: Monique Mergoil.Google Scholar
Marlière, E. 2003. Tonneaux et amphores à Vindolanda: contribution à la connaissance de l'approvisionnement des troupes stationnées sur la frontière Nord de l'Empire. In: Birley, A., ed. Vindolanda Research Report: The Excavation of 2001–2002, Volume 1. Hexham: Vindolanda Trust, pp. 125–79.Google Scholar
Marlière, E. 2014. Les campagnes militaires et l'expansion de l'usage du tonneau dans l'Empire romain. In: Perrot, M. & Pérard, J., eds. De la cave au vin: une fructueuse alliance. Dijon: Université de Bourgogne, pp. 47–61.Google Scholar
Marlière, E. & Costa, J.T. 2005. Tonneaux et amphores à Vindolanda: contribution à la connaissance de l'approvisionnement des troupes stationnées sur le mur d'Hadrien (II). In: Birley, A. & Blake, J., eds. Vindolanda: The Excavation of 2003/2004. Hexham: Vindolanda Trust, pp. 214–36.Google Scholar
Mauri, A., De Rigo, D. & Caudullo, G. 2016. Abies alba in Europe: Distribution, Habitat, Usage, and Threats. In: San-Miguel-Ayanz, J., De Rigo, D., Caudullo, G., Houston Durrant, T.. & Mauri, A., eds. European Atlas of Forest Tree Species. Luxembourg: European Commission, pp. 48–49.Google Scholar
Morris, C.A. 2000. Wood and Woodworking in Anglo-Scandinavian and Medieval York (The Archaeology of York 17(13): The Small Finds). York: Council for British Archaeology.Google Scholar
Nakagawa, T., De Beaulieu, J.-L. & Kitagawa, H. 2000. Pollen-derived History of Timber Exploitation from the Roman Period Onwards in the Romanche Valley, Central French Alps. Vegetation History and Archaeobotany, 9: 85–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olsen, B. 2010. In Defense of Things: Archaeology and the Ontology of Objects, Lanham (MD): AltaMira.Google Scholar
Padley, T.G. 1991. The Wooden Objects. In: Padley, T. & Winterbottom, C.. The Wooden, Leather and Bone Objects from Castle Street, Carlisle Excavations (Cumberland and Westmoreland Antiquarian and Archaeological Society Research Series 5). Kendal: Cumberland and Westmorland Antiquarian and Archaeological Society, pp. 203–27.Google Scholar
Pearce, J. 2004. Archaeology, Writing Tablets and Literacy in Roman Britain. Gallia, 61: 43–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pollard, A.M., Bray, P., Gosden, C., Wilson, A. & Hamerow, H. 2015. Characterising Copper-based Metals in Britain in the First Millennium ad: A Preliminary Quantification of Metal Flow and Recycling. Antiquity, 89: 697–713.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reis, A. 1997. Roman Barrel Finds from Vindolanda (unpublished MA dissertation, Durham University).Google Scholar
Ribereau-Gayon, P. 1994. The Barrel and the Wine: Scientific Mastering of a Traditional Know-how. Seguin Moreau Cooperage. Napa (CA): Enology Institute of the University of Bordeaux, Seguin Moreau USA.Google Scholar
Riesco Muñoz, G., Remacha Gete, A. & Gasalla Regueiro, M. 2013. Variation in Log Quality and Prediction of Sawing Yield in Oak Wood (Quercus robur). Annals of Forest Science, 70: 695–706.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ross, L.A. 1985. 16th-Century Spanish Basque Coopering. Historical Archaeology, 19: 1–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rubio-Campillo, X., Coto-Sarmiento, M., Pérez-Gonzalez, J. & Rodríguez, J.R. 2017. Bayesian Analysis and Free Market Trade within the Roman Empire. Antiquity, 91: 1241–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rule, M. & Monaghan, J. 1993. A Gallo-Roman Trading Vessel from Guernsey: The Excavation and Recovery of a Third Century Shipwreck (Guernsey Museum Monograph No. 5). Guernsey: Guernsey Museum & Galleries.Google Scholar
Saedlou, N. & Dupéron, M. 2007. Etude xylologique et typologique des tablettes à écriture antiques en bois à partir des découvertes faites à Saintes (Charente-Maritime). In: Dupouey, J.-L., Danbrine, E., Dardignac, C. & George-Leriy, M., eds. La mémoire des forêts: actes du colloque Forêt, archéologie et environnement, 14–16 décembre 2004. Paris: Office national des forêts, Institut national de la recherche agronomique & Nancy: Direction régionale des affaires culturelles de Lorraine.Google Scholar
Sands, R. & Hather, J.G. in prep. Wooden Small Finds from Vindolanda. Vindolanda Trust.Google Scholar
Sands, R. & Horn, J.A. 2017. Bring me Three Large Beers: Wooden Tankards at Roman Vindolanda. Oxford Journal of Archaeology, 36: 503–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schiffer, M.B. 1972. Archaeological Context and Systemic Context. American Antiquity, 37: 156–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schiffer, M.B. 2010. Behavioural Archaeology: Principles and Practice. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Schweingruber, F.H. 1990. Microscopic Wood Anatomy: Structural Variability of Stems and Twigs in Recent and Subfossil Woods from Central Europe. Birmensdorf: Eidgenössische Forschungsanstalt.Google Scholar
Sciallano, M. 1993. L'art du tonnelier. Istres: Musée d'Istres.Google Scholar
Sealey, P.R. 2009. New Light on the Wine Trade with Julio-Claudian Britain. Britannia, 40: 1–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stewart, K. 2016. Identifying the Wooden Tablets to Species. In: Tomlin, R.S.O., ed. Roman London's First Voices: Writing Tablets from the Bloomberg Excavations, 2010–2014 (MOLA Monograph 72). London: Museum of London, p. 6.Google Scholar
Swift, E. 2012. Object Biography, Re-use and Recycling in the Late to Post-Roman Transition Period and Beyond: Rings Made from Romano-British Bracelets. Britannia, 43: 167–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tegtmeier, U. 2016. Holzobjekte und Holzhandwerk im römischen Köln: Archäologie Nord-Süd Stadtbahn Köln. Köln: Römisch Germanisches Museum.Google Scholar
Tomlin, R.S.O. 2016. Roman London's First Voices: Writing Tablets from the Bloomberg Excavations, 2010–14 (MOLA Monograph 72). London: Museum of London.Google Scholar
Ulbert, G. 1959. Römische Holzfässer aus Regensburg. Bayerische Vorgeschichtsblätter, 24: 6–29.Google Scholar
Verboven, K. 2011. Professional Collegia: Guilds or Social Clubs? Ancient Society, 41: 187–95.Google Scholar
Viérin, J. & Léva, C. 1961. Un puits à tonneau romain avec sigles et graffiti à Harelbeke. Latomus, 20: 759–84.Google Scholar
Wilson, A. 2009. Approaches to Quantifying Roman Trade. In: Bowman, A.W.A & Wilson, A., eds. Quantifying the Roman Economy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 213–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar