We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
Is archaeology only ideologically biased rhetoric? A report of WAC Inter-Congress on the Destruction and Conservation of Cultural Property, Brač, Croatia, May 1998
Published online by Cambridge University Press:
25 January 2017
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)
References
Álvarez Sanchís, J., 1995. Etica y política. El envés del WAC. Complutum6.Google Scholar
Bernbeck, R. and Pollock, S., 1996. Ayodhya, Archaeology, and Identity. Current Anthropology37, Supplement: February. 138–42.Google Scholar
Bernbeck, R. and Sommer, U., 1994. Politik, Mythos und Archäologie: Der World Archaeological Congress 3 in New Delhi 1994 und Ayodhya. Etnographisch-Archäologische Zeitschrift35: 475–98.Google Scholar
Boylan, Paul, 1993. Review of the Convention for the Protection of Cultural Property in the Event of Armed Conflict. Paris: UNESCO.Google Scholar
Brodie, Neil, 1998. The antiquities trade in the United Kingdom: recent developments. Brač: WAC Inter-Congress.Google Scholar
Čače, S., Forenbaher, S. and Gaffney, V., 1998. Cultural resource management issues in the Adriatic Islands Project. Brač: WAC Inter-Congress.Google Scholar
Cleere, Henry, 1998. The uneasy bedfellows: University and cultural heritage. Brač: WAC Inter-Congress.Google Scholar
Colley, S., 1995. What happened at WAC-3?. Antiquity69: 15–18.Google Scholar
Edwards, John, 1998. The use of worship in Roman and Medieval Córdoba. Brač: WAC Inter-Congress.Google Scholar
Eze-Uzomaka, Pamela, 1998. Archaeology and conflict with indigenous peoples in South East Nigeria. Brač: WAC Inter-Congress.Google Scholar
Funari, P.P.A., 1998. Destruction and conservation of cultural property in Brazil: academic and practical challenges. Brač: WAC Inter-Congress.Google Scholar
Gauch, Sarah, 1998. Everything old is new again, faulty restoration is endangering Egypt's ancient treasures. Newsweek, June 1: 19.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen, (1976 [1974]). ‘Die Rolle der Philosophie im Marxismus’. In Zur Rekonstruktion des Historischen Materialismus: 49–59. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp Taschenbuch Wissenschaft.Google Scholar
Hassan, Fekri, 1998. Ethics, empirical adequacy and multivocality in Archaeology. Brač: WAC Inter-Congress.Google Scholar
Holtorf, Cornelius, 1998a. Is the past a non-renewable resource?Brač: WAC Inter-Congress.Google Scholar
Holtokf, Cornelius, 1998b. A brief report about the WAC (World Archaeological Congress) Inter-Congress on ‘The Destruction and Conservation of Cultural Property’ on the Island of Brač in Croatia, 3–7 May 1998. Arch-Theory12 (5). [http://www.mailbase.ac.uk/lists/arch-theory/1998-05/0052.html]Google Scholar
Ivankovič, Nenad, 1998. Croatia and the world. Croatia Weekly, January 15, 1 (1): 1.Google Scholar
Jones, Siǎn, 1997. The Archaeology of Ethnicity, Constructing Identities in the Past and Present. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Khan, Majeed, 1998. Ethno-religious violence towards cultural heritage. Brač WAC Inter-Congress.Google Scholar
Krishnan, Y., 1998. Destruction of cultural property in Tibet after the Chinese invasion of 1950. Brač: WAC Inter-Congress.Google Scholar
Marchand, Suzanne, 1996. Down from Olympus. Archaeology and Philhellenism in Germany, 1750–1970. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mbunwe-Samba, Patrick, 1998. Should developing countries also conserve and restore cultural property?A point of view from Cameroon. Brač: WAC Inter-Congress.Google Scholar
Ogundele, S. Oluwde, 1998. Archaeology in a developing geo-polity: the Nigerian experience. Brač: WAC Inter-Congress.Google Scholar
Olsen, Bjørnar, 1998. The end of what? History and identity in a post-modern world. Brač: WAC Inter-Congress.Google Scholar
Pachauri, S.K., 1998. Destruction of historical sites and monuments by human and other agencies and their preservation. Brač: WAC Inter-Congress.Google Scholar
Podgorny, Irina, 1996. El tercer Congreso Arqueológico Mundial en Nueva Delhi y los límites de la ingenuidad postmoderna. Relaciones de la Sociedad Argentina de Anthopología, 21: 103–117.Google Scholar
Rao, Nandini, 1995. Politics and the World Archaeological Congress −3, Trabajos de Prehistoria, 52, 1:5–11, Madrid, Centro de Estudios Históricos, CSIC.Google Scholar
Reynolds, J., 1994. Archaeological Congress: Not a total disaster. The Hindustan Times, December 20: 13.Google Scholar
Ronayne, Maggie, 1998. Towards an ethical understanding of archaeological practices. Brač: WAC Inter-Congress.Google Scholar
Shrimali, Krishna M., 1998. Ayodhya archaeology: from imbroglio to resolution. Brač: WAC Inter-Congress.Google Scholar
Stewart, Charles, 1998. Immanent or eminent domain?The contest over Thessaloniki's rotunda. Brač: WAC Inter-Congress.Google Scholar
Šulc, Branka, 1998. The destruction of cultural property in war. Brač: WAC Inter-Congress.Google Scholar
Thomas, J., 1998. WAC history and policies. Vitória, April, unpublished conference lecture.Google Scholar
Tierney, M., 1995. WAC 3 and the role of archaeologists as intellectuals. WAC News, 3 (1):ii–iii.Google Scholar
Trotzig, Gustav, 1998. As good as old/new: problems of adjusting the modern archaeological heritage to modern society. Brač: WAC Inter-Congress.Google Scholar
Tubb, Kathryn Walker, 1998. Museum to mantelpiece. Brač: WAC Inter-Congress.Google Scholar
Ucko, Peter, 1987. Academic freedom and Apartheid. The Story of the World Archaeological Congress. London: Duckworth.Google Scholar
Vjesnik, L., 1998. St Lawrence reborn and Vukovar Fresco preserved only in Fragments. Croatia Weekly January 15, 1 (1): last page.Google Scholar