Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T06:30:42.406Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Henri Duday (translation by Anna Maria Cipriani and John Pearce), The Archaeology of the Dead: Lectures in Archaeothanatology (Studies in Funerary Archaeology 3, Oxford: Oxbow, 2009, x+158 pp., 143 figs., pbk, ISBN 978-1-84217-356-5)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 January 2017

Vera Tiesler
Vera Tiesler*
Affiliation:
Faculty of Anthropological Sciences, Autonomous University of Yucatan, Mexicox
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Reviews
Information
European Journal of Archaeology , Volume 14 , Issue 3 , 2011 , pp. 491 - 494
Copyright
Copyright © 2011 Maney Publishing 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Boddington, A., Garland, A.N. and Janaway, R.C., 1987. Death, Decay and Reconstruction: Approaches to Archaeology and Forensic Science. Manchester: Manchester University.Google Scholar
Boulestin, B. and Duday, H., 2005. Ethnologie et archéologie de la mort: de l'illusion des références à l'emploi d'un vocabulaire. In Mordant, C. and Depierre, G. (eds), Les Pratiques Funéraires à l'Age du Bronze en France. Memoirs de la Société Archéologique de Sens, 10—12 June, 1998: 17–35. Paris: Editions du Comité des Travaux Historiques et Scientifiques.Google Scholar
Gowland, R. and Knüsel, C. (eds), 2006. Social Archaeology of Funerary Remains. Oxford: Oxbow.Google Scholar
Haglund, W.D. and Sorg, M.H. (eds), 1997. Forensic Taphonomy: The Postmortem Fate of Human Remains. Boca Raton: CRC Press.Google Scholar
Haglund, W.D. and Sorg, M.H. (eds), 2002. Advances in Forensic Taphonomy: Method, Theory, and Archaeological Perspective. Boca Raton: CRC Press.Google Scholar
Micozzi, M.S., 1991. Postmortem Change in Human and Animal Remains: A Systematic Approach. Springfield: Charles C. Thomas.Google Scholar
Parker Pearson, M., 1999. The Archaeology of Death and Burial. College Station: Texas A&M University.Google Scholar
Parker Pearson, M., Chamberlain, A., Craig, O., Marshall, P., Mulville, J., Smith, H., Chenery, C., Collins, M., Cook, G., Craig, G., Evans, J., Hiller, J., Montgomery, J., Schwenninger, J.L., Taylor, G. and Wess, T., 2005. Evidence for mummification in Bronze Age Britain. Antiquity 79: 529–546.Google Scholar
Saul, J.M. and Saul, F.P., 2002. Forensics, archaeology and taphonomy: the symbiotic relationship. In Haglund, W.D. and Sorg, M.H. (eds), Advances in Forensic Taphonomy: Method, Theory, and Archaeological Perspective: 71–97. Boca Raton: CRC Press.Google Scholar
Ubelaker, D.H., 1989. Human Skeletal Remains. 12th edn. Washington, D.C.: Taraxacum.Google Scholar