We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)
References
Buss, D.M., 2001. Human nature and culture: An evolutionary psychological perspective. Journal of Personality69(6):155–178.Google Scholar
Deregowski, J.B., 1989. Real space and represented space: cross-cultural perspectives. Behavioral and Brain Sciences12:51–119.Google Scholar
Deregowski, J.B., 1995. Perception – depiction – perception, and communication: a skeleton key to rock art and its significance. Rock Art Research12(1):3–22.Google Scholar
Engquist, M. and Arak, A., 1993. Selection of exaggerated male traits by female aesthetic senses. Nature361(6411):446–448.Google Scholar
Latto, R., 1995. The brain of the beholder. In Gregory, R. et al. (eds), The Artful Eye:66–94. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lindstr⊘m, T.C. and Kristoffersen, S., 2001. ‘Figure it out!’ Psychological perspectives on perception of Migration Period animal art. Norwegian Archaeological Review34(2):65–84.Google Scholar
Musgrave, J.H., Neave, R.A.H. and Prag, A.J.N.W., 1995. Seven faces from Grave Circle B at Mycenae. The Annual of the British School at Athens90:107–36.Google Scholar
Nell, V, 2006. Cruelty's rewards: the gratification of perpetrators and spectators. Behavioral and Brain Sciences29:211–257.Google Scholar
Reber, R. and Schwarz, N., 2006. Perceptual fluency, preference, and evolution. Polish Psychological Bulletin37:16–22.Google Scholar