Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T14:46:20.726Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

From Constantinople to Istanbul: The Residences of the Venetian Bailo (Thirteenth to Sixteenth Centuries)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 January 2017

Aygül Ağır*
Affiliation:
Faculty of Architecture, Istanbul Technical University, Turkey
*

Abstract

Medieval Italian city-states with access to the sea, most notably the Venetian and Genoese, were in need of safe ‘stopovers’ that would allow their inhabitants to travel to distant places across the territories in which they conducted commerce. As the most important ‘stopover’ and centre of consumption, Constantinople became a point of attraction for Italian merchant colonies, particularly after the eleventh century. Among these, the most powerful one with the largest settlement was the Venetian colony. Following a decree dated 1082 (Chrysoboullos) that granted them certain privileges, the Venetians settled across the southern shores of the Golden Horn. In terms of administration, it appears that, until the Latin period (1204–1261), no formal officers were appointed to the Venetian Merchant Colony. ‘The bailo’ was first instituted in Constantinople only after the treaty of 18 June 1265. The mention of a house owned by the bailo dates as late as 1277. Documents on the residence of the bailo remain silent until the early fifteenth century. It is unclear if the palace of the bailo mentioned in fifteenth-century documents and the house allocated to the bailo in 1277 are the same building. Despite the Turkish conquest of Constantinople in 1453, the Venetians, albeit with interruptions, continued to live on the historic peninsula. However, it is no longer possible to speak of a Venetian settlement similar to the one that had existed in Byzantine times. Per the agreement signed on 16 August 1454, the Venetians were granted a house and a church that ‘once’ belonged to Anconitans. The possible location and architectural features of the residences of the bailo, which have left behind no archaeological data, are discussed here through written sources including Ottoman documents.

Les cités-États italiennes du Moyen-Âge qui étaient accessibles par la mer, comme principalement Venise et Gênes, ressentirent le besoin d'établir des ‘étapes' sûres leur permettant de se rendre vers des destinations lointaines pour faire du commerce. Constantinople était la plus importante de ces ‘étapes' ’ et le plus grand centre de commerce mondial. C'est ainsi qu'à partir du XIe siècle, la ville devint pour les cités-États italiennes et en particulier pour la plus grande et la plus puissante d'entre elles, Venise, un pôle d'attraction pour l'établissement de colonies italiennes de commerce. Suite au décret (Chrysoboullos) de 1082 qui permetta l'accord de certains privilèges, les Vénitiens s'établirent sur la côte sud de la Corne d'Or (Haliç). En ce qui concerne l'administration, il n'y a pas d'agents officiels nommés à la colonie marchande vénitienne de Constantinople jusqu'à la période latine (1204–1261). La fonction de ‘baile’ a été instituée pour la première fois après le traité du 18 juin 1265. La mention d'une maison qui lui appartient ne date que du 1277. Les documents sur la résidence ou le palais du baile restent inconnus jusqu'au début du 15ème siècle. On ignore si le palais du baile indiqué dans les documents du 15ème siècle et la maison qui lui est allouée en 1277 sont les mêmes bâtiments. Après la conquête de Constantinople par les Turcs en 1453 et malgré quelques interruptions, les Vénitiens continuèrent d'asseoir leur présence dans la péninsule historique, mais on ne peux véritablement pas parler d'un ‘quartier’ vénitien comme durant la période byzantine. Par l'accord signé le 16 août 1454, les Vénitiens ont été attribués une maison et une église qui autrefois appartenaient aux Ancônitains. L'emplacement possible et les caractéristiques architecturales des résidences du baile, pour lesquelles il n'existe malheureusement aucun renseignement archéologique, sont discutés avec l'aide de documents ottomans et de sources écrites.

Die mittelalterlichen italienischen Stadtstaaten mit Zugang zum Mittelmeer, unter denen besonders die Venezianer und die Genueser, benötigten sichere ‘Haltestellen’, die ihre Reisen in den entfernten Handelsgebieten ermöglichten. Als der wichtigste Aufenthalts- und Handelsort wurde Konstantinopel besonders nach dem 11. Jahrhundert zum primären Anziehungspunkt für die italienischen Handelskolonien. Dabei besaßen die Venezianer die einflussreichste und größte Siedlung. Einer Begünstigungsanordnung aus dem Jahr 1082 folgend, besiedelten die Venezianer die Südküste des Goldenen Horns. Zur Regierung der venezianischen Handelskolonie in Konstantinopel wurden bis zu der Zeit des Lateinischen Kaiserreiches (1204–1261) offiziell keine Statthalter berufen. ‘Der Bailo’ (Gesandter) wurde erst nach dem Vertrag am 18. Juni 1265 ernannt. Die erste Erwähnung eines Hauses, das zu einem Bailo gehörte, ist auf das Jahr 1277 zurückzuführen. Vor dem frühen 15. Jahrhundert gibt es keine Dokumente, die von der Residenz oder dem Palast des Gesandten berichten. Es ist unklar, ob der Palast des Gesandten, der in den Dokumenten vom 15. Jahrhundert erwähnt wird, mit dem Haus des Gesandten von 1277 identisch ist. Trotz der türkischen Eroberung Konstantinopels im Jahr 1453, konnten die Venezianer ihren Wohnsitz auf der sogenannten historischen Halbinsel, obschon mit Unterbrechungen, beibehalten. Jedoch ist es dann nicht mehr möglich von einer ‘venezianischen Siedlung’ zu reden, die in dieser Form unter byzantinischer Herrschaft existierte. Gemäβ dem Vertrag, der am 16. August 1454 unterschrieben wurde, wurden die Venezianer mit einem Haus und einer Kirche, die ehemals zu Ankoniter gehörten, bevorrechtigt. Der mögliche Ort und die architektonischen Besonderheiten der Residenzen des Bailo, die keine archäologischen Spuren hinterlassen haben, werden anhand von schriftlichen Quellen (darunter auch osmanische Dokumente) diskutiert.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © 2015 the European Association of Archaeologists 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ağır, A. 1999. Whether Balkapanı Han Had Witnessed the Continuity of Commerce in the Old Venetian Quarter of Istanbul. In: Akın, N., Batur, A. & Batur, S., eds. 7 Centuries of Ottoman Architecture, A Supra-National Heritage. Istanbul: Yem Publications, pp. 95102.Google Scholar
Ağır, A. 2006. Gli stabilimenti dei Veneziani dopo l'anno 1204. In: Ortalli, G., Ravegnani, G. & Schreiner, P., eds. Quarta Crociata, Venezia-Bisanzio-Impero Latino. Venezia: Istituto Veneto di Scienze Lettere ed Arti, pp. 771–88.Google Scholar
Ağır, A. 2010. Konstantinopolis'te Locus Venetorum (1082–1261): Yapılar ve Olası Yerleri (Locus Venetorum in Constantinople. Buildings and their Probable Locations). In: Ödekan, A., Akyürek, E. & Necipoğlu, N., eds. First International Sevgi Gönül Byzantine Studies Symposium. Proceedings. Istanbul: Vehbi Koç Vakfı, pp. 324–32.Google Scholar
Ağır, A. 2013. İstanbul'un Eski Venedik Yerleşimi ve Dönüşümü (Old Venetian Settlement of Istanbul and Its Transformation), 2nd ed. Istanbul: Suna ve İnan Kıraç Vakfı İstanbul Araştırmaları Enstitüsü.Google Scholar
Ayverdi, E.H. 1958. 19. Yüzyılda İstanbul Haritası. The 19th Century Istanbul Map. İstanbul: Istanbul Fetih Cemiyeti.Google Scholar
Barbaro, N. 1856. Giornale dell'assedio di Costantinopoli, 1453. Corredato di note e documenti, per Enrico Cornet. Vienna: Tendler.Google Scholar
Barkan, Ö.L. & Ayverdi, E.H. 1970. İstanbul vakıfları tahrîr defteri: 953 (1546) târîhli (Istanbul Waqf Registers Dated Hijra 953/1546). Istanbul: Baha Matbaası.Google Scholar
Belin, M.A. 1894. Histoire de la Latinité de Constantinople. Paris: Alphonse Picard et Fils Editeurs.Google Scholar
Bertelè, T. 2012. Venedik ve Kostantiniyye. Tarihte Osmanlı-Venedik İlişkileri (Il Palazzo degli ambasciatori di Venezia a Costantinopoli e le sue antiche memorie), trans. by Şakiroğlu, M.H. Istanbul: Kitap Yayınevi.Google Scholar
Beylié, L.M.E. 1903. L'Habitation byzantine. Les anciennes maisons de Constantinople. Grenoble: Falque et F. Perrin.Google Scholar
Borsari, S. 1988. Venezia e Bisanzio nel XII secolo: i rapporti economici. Venezia: Deputazione Edittrice.Google Scholar
Brown, H.F. 1920. The Venetians and the Venetian Quarter in Constantinople to the Close of the Twelfth Century. Journal of Hellenistic Studies, 40: 6888.Google Scholar
Carosi, C. 2008. Un processo fra mercanti anconetani a Costantinopoli assediata dai Turchi, negli atti di un notaio genovese (sec. XV). [accessed 5 April 2014]. Centro di Studi per la storia del Notariato Genovese ‘Giorgio Costamagna’. Available at: <http://www.centrostudicostamagna.it>Google Scholar
Coco, C. & Manzonetto, F. 1985. Baili Veneziani alla Sublime Porta. Venezia: Comune di Venezia, Università degli Studi di Venezia.Google Scholar
Concina, E. 1997. Fondaci: architettura, arte, e mercatura tra Levante, Venezia, e Alemagna. Venezia: Saggi Marsilio.Google Scholar
Constable, O.R. 2004. Housing the Stranger in the Mediterranean World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dark, K.R. 2004. Houses, Streets and Shops in Byzantine Constantinople from the Fifth to Twelfth Centuries. Journal of Medieval History, 30: 83107.Google Scholar
Dirimtekin, F. 1956. Fetihden Önce Haliç Surları (Haliç Walls Before the Conquest). Istanbul: İstanbul Enstitüsü.Google Scholar
Downey, G. 1955. Earthquakes at Constantinople and Vicinity, A.D. 342–1454. Speculum, 30 (4): 596600.Google Scholar
Dursteler, E.R. 2006. Venetians in Constantinople. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Ergin, O. 1945. Fatih İmareti Vakfiyesi (Waqfiyye of Mehmed II, the Conqueror's ‘imâret). Istanbul: Belediye Matbaası.Google Scholar
Eyice, S. 1992. Balkapanı Hanı. In: Güran, K., ed. Türkiye Diyanet Vakfı İslam Ansiklopedisi, 5, V. Istanbul: Türkiye Diyanet Vakfı, p. 133.Google Scholar
Failler, A. 1986. L'Église des Ancônitains à Constantinople. Revue des études byzantines, 44: 253–55.Google Scholar
Fatih Mehmet II Vakfiyeleri (Waqfiyyes of Mehmed II, the Conqueror). 1938. Türk Vakfiyeleri, 1. Ankara: Vakıflar Umum Müdürlüğü Neşriyatı.Google Scholar
Fleming, J., Honour, H. & Pevsner, N. 1999. Dictionary of Architecture & Landscape Architecture. London, NY: Penguin.Google Scholar
Genala, F. 1889. Il Palazzo di San Giorgio in Genova: demolizione o conservazione. Firenze: S. Landi.Google Scholar
Georgopoulou, M. 2001. Venice's Mediterranean Colonies. Architecture and Urbanism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gökbilgin, T. 1964. Venedik Devlet Arşivindeki Vesikalar Külliyatında Kanuni Sultan Sülayman Devri Belgeleri (Documents of the Period of Suleyman, the Legislator—the Magnificent—in the State Archive of Venice). Belgeler, 2: 121220.Google Scholar
Hilsdale, J.H. 2010. The Imperial Image at the End of Exile. The Byzantine Embroidered Silk in Genoa and the Treaty of Nymphaion (1261). Dumbarton Oaks Papers, 64: 151–99, 231–32.Google Scholar
Hür, A. 1993. Ankonalılar. In: Akbayar, N., Isin, E., Sakaoglu, N., Baydar, O., Tanman, B., Koz, S., Aksoy, B., Batur, A. & Yusufoglu, Y., eds. Dünden Bugüne İstanbul Ansiklopedisi, 1. Istanbul: Türkiye Ekonomik ve Toplumsal Tarih Vakfı, pp. 275–76.Google Scholar
İnalcık, H. 2012. The Survey of Istanbul 1455: The Text, English Translation, Analysis of the Text, Documents. Istanbul: Türkiye İş Bankası Kültür Yayınları.Google Scholar
Jacoby, D. 2001a. The Venetian Quarter of Constantinople from 1082 to 1261. In: Sode, C. & Takacs, S.A., eds. Novum Millennium: Studies Byzantine History and Culture Dedicated to Paul Speck. Aldershot: Ashgate, pp. 153–70.Google Scholar
Jacoby, D. 2001b. The Urban Evolution of Latin Constantinople (1204–1261). In: Necipoğlu, N., ed. Byzantine Constantinople. Monuments, Topography and Everyday Life. Leiden: Brill, pp. 277–97.Google Scholar
Jacoby, D. 2001c. The Venetian Presence in the Latin Empire of Constantinople (1204–1261): The Challenge of Feudalism and the Byzantine Inheritance. In: Byzantium, Latin Romania and the Mediterranean. VI/168. Aldershot: Ashgate, pp. 141201 Google Scholar
Jacoby, D. 2007. Houses and Urban Layout in the Venetian Quarter of Constantinople: Twelfth and Thirteenth Centuries. In: Belke, K., Kislinger, E., Kuelzer, A. & Stassinopoulou, M.A. eds Byzantina Mediterranea. Festschrift für Johannes Koder zum 65. Geburtstag. Wien: Boehlau-Verlag, pp. 269–82.Google Scholar
Jacoby, D. 2013. The Minor Western Nations in Constantinople. Trade and Shipping from the Early Twelfth Century to 1261. In: Varzeliōtē, G.K. & Tsiknakēs, K.G., eds. Galēnotatē: timē stē Chrysa Maltezou (Γαληνοτάτη : τιμή στη Χρύσα Μαλτέζου). Athēna : Mouseio Benakē, pp. 319–32.Google Scholar
Janin, R. 1964. Constantinople Byzantine. Development Urbain et Repertoire Topographique, Deuxiéme édition. Paris: Institut Francais d'Etudes Byzantines.Google Scholar
Kafesçioğlu, Ç. 2009. Constantinopolis/Istanbul: Cultural Encounter, İmperial Vision, and the Construction of the Ottoman Capital. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University.Google Scholar
Kazhdan, A., Talbot, A.M., Cutler, A., Gregory, T.E. & Sevcenko, N.P. eds. 1991. The Oxford Dictionary of Byzantium. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kuban, D. 2010. Istanbul, an Urban History: Byzantion, Constantinopolis. Istanbul: Türkiye İş Bankası Kültür Yayınları.Google Scholar
Madden, T.F. 1991–1992. The Fires of the Fourth Crusade in Constantinople. 1203–1204: A Damage Assessment. Byzantinische Zeitscrift, 84–85: 7293.Google Scholar
Magdalino, P. 2000. The Maritime Neighborhoods of Constantinople: Commercial and Residential Functions, Sixth to Twelfth Centuries. Dumbarton Oaks Papers, 54: 209–2.Google Scholar
Maltezou, C.A. 1979. Il quartiere veneziano di Costantinopoli (scali marittimi). In: Actes du XVe Congrès international d'études byzantines. Athènes: Comité d'organisation du congrès 4, pp. 208–39Google Scholar
Majeska, G.P. 1984. Russian travelers to Constantinople in the Fourteenth and Fifteenth Centuries. Washington, DC: Dumbarton Oaks Research Library and Collection.Google Scholar
Mordtmann, A. 1892. Esquisse topographique de Constantinople. Lille: Desclée, De Brouwer.Google Scholar
Müller-Wiener, W. 1998. Bizans'tan Osmanlı'ya İstanbul Limanı (Die Häfen von Byzantion, Konstantinupolis, Istanbul), trans. by Özbek, E. Istanbul: Tarih Vakfı Yurt Yayınları.Google Scholar
Mundell-Mango, M. 2001. The Porticoed Street at Constantinople. In: Necipoğlu, N., ed. Byzantine Constantinople: Monuments, Topography and Everyday Life. Leiden: Brill, pp. 2951.Google Scholar
Necipoğlu, N. 2009. Byzantium between the Ottomans and the Latins. Politics and Society in the Late Empire. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Nicol, M.D. 2000. Bizans ve Venedik. Diplomatik ve Kültürel İlişkiler Üzerine (Byzantium and Venice: A Study in Diplomatic and Cultural Relations), trans. by Güven, G.Ç. Istanbul: Sabancı Üniversitesi.Google Scholar
Niermeyer, J.F. 1976. Mediae Latinitas Lexicon Minus: A medieval Latin-French/English dictionary. Leiden: E.J. Brill.Google Scholar
Ögel, S. & Ağır, A. 2005. The Loggia: A Common Achitectural Element in Istanbul and Venice. In: Gaier, M., Nicolai, B. & Weddington, T., eds. Festschrift zu Ehren von Wolfgang Wolters, Der UnbestechlicheBlick / Lo sguardo incorruttibile. Trier: Porta Alba, pp. 4148.Google Scholar
Origone, S. 1992. Bisanzio e Genova. Genova: Edizioni Culturali Internazionali.Google Scholar
Ousterhout, R. 2006. The Pantokrator Monastery and Architectural Interchanges in the Thirteenth Century. In: Ortalli, G., Ravegnani, G. & Schreiner, P., eds. Quarta Crociata, Venezia-Bisanzio-Impero Latino. Venezia: Istituto Veneto di Scienze Lettere ed Arti, pp. 749–70.Google Scholar
Öz, T. ed. 1935. Zwei Stiftungsurkunden des Sultans Mehmed II. Fatih. Istanbul: İstanbul des Archäologischen Institutes des deutschen Reiches.Google Scholar
Özulu, T. 2011. Venedik Sarayı ve yakın çevresi: Tomtom Kaptan Sokağı ve Postacılar Sokağı Yapıları (The Palace of Venice and Surroundings: Edifices of the Tomtom Kaptan and Postacılar Streets) (, Istanbul Technical University).Google Scholar
Pedani, M.P. 2010. Venezia porta d'Oriente. Venezia: il Mulino.Google Scholar
Pedani, M.P. 2013a. Come (non) fare un inventario d'archivio. Le carte del bailo a Costantinopoli conservate a Venezia. Fonti, 28: 381404.Google Scholar
Pedani, M.P. ed. 2013b. Il Palazzo di Venezia a Istanbul e i suoi antichi abitanti. Hilal, Studi Turchi e Ottomani. Venezia: Edizioni Ca’ Foscari.Google Scholar
Pertusi, A. 1980. The Anconitan Colony in Constantinople and the Report of its Consul, Benvenuto, on the Fall of the City. In: Laiou-Thomadakis, A.E., ed. Charanis Studies. Essays in Honor of Peter Charanis. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press, pp. 199218.Google Scholar
Pervititch, J. 2001. Sigorta Haritalarında Istanbul. Istanbul in the Insurance Maps of Jacques Pervititch. Istanbul: Tarih Vakfı Yurt Yayınları.Google Scholar
Pozza, M. & Ravegnani, G. eds. 1993. I trattati con Bisanzio, 992–1198. Venezia: Il Cardo.Google Scholar
Pozza, M. & Ravegnani, G. eds. 1996. I trattati con Bizansio 1265–1285. Venezia: Il Cardo.Google Scholar
Runciman, S. 1999. Constantinopolis Düştü, trad. Türkömer, D., Istanbul: Doğan Kitap.Google Scholar
Şakiroğlu, M. 1982. 1521 Tarihli Osmanlı-Venedik Anlaşmasının Aslî Metni (The Original Text of the Ottoman-Venetian Treaty Dated 1521). Tarih Enstitüsü Dergisi, 12: 388403.Google Scholar
Schneider, A.M. 1950. Mauern und Tore am Goldenen Horn zu Konstantinopel. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.Google Scholar
Serghides, D.K. 2010. The Wisdom of Mediterranean Traditional Architecture Versus Contemporary Architecture: The Energy Challenge. Open Construction and Building Technology Journal, 4: 2938.Google Scholar
Sexton, D. 1997. A History of Renaissance Civic Loggias in Italy from the Loggia dei Lanzi to Sansovino's Loggetta. , Yale University.Google Scholar
Tafel, G.L.F. & Thomas, G.M. eds. 1856-1857. Urkunden zur älteren Handels- und Staatsgeschichte der Republik Venedig, mit besonderer Beziehung auf Byzanz und die Levante. Vom neunten bis zum Ausgang des fünfzehnten Jahrhunderts. Wien: Hof- und Staatsdruckerei.Google Scholar
Talbot, A.M. 1993. Restoration of Constantinople Under Michael VIII. Dumbarton Oaks Papers, 47: 243–61.Google Scholar
Thiriet, F. ed. 1959-1961. Régestes des délibérations du Sénat de Venise concernant la Romainie, II, III. Paris: Mouton.Google Scholar
Thomas, J., Hero, C.A. & Constable, G. 2000. Byzantine Monastic Foundation Documents: A Complete Translation of the Surviving Founders' Typika and Testaments. Washington: Dumbarton Oaks Research Library and Collection.Google Scholar
van Millingen, A. 2010. Byzantine Constantinople: The Walls of the city and Adjoining Historical Sites. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Yerasimos, S. 1995. La communauté juive d'Istanbul a la fin du XVIe siècle. Turcica, 27: 101–30.Google Scholar
Yerasimos, S. & Bacqué-Grammont, J.-L. 1996. La résidence du baile de Venise à Balıkpazarı. Essai de localisation. Anatolia Moderna, Yeni Anadolu, 6: 111.Google Scholar
Zeno, C. 1882. Feste date da Toscani e Veneziani in Costantinopoli nel carnovale 1524; narrate a Jacopo Corner in lettera del 17 febbraio. Venezia. Google Scholar