No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Emilie Sibbesson , Ben Jervis and Sarah Coxon , eds. Insight from Innovation: New Light on Archaeological Ceramics. Papers Presented in Honour of Professor David Peacock's Contributions to Archaeological Ceramic Studies (Southampton Monographs in Archaeology, New Series 6. St. Andrews: The Highfield Press, 2016, xxxvi and 277pp., 85 colour and b/w illustr., 13 tables, ISBN: 978-0-9926336-4-6)
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 17 July 2017
Abstract
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Book Reviews
- Information
- European Journal of Archaeology , Volume 20 , Special Issue 3: Animal Husbandry in the Western Roman Empire: A Zooarchaeological Perspective , August 2017 , pp. 572 - 576
- Copyright
- Copyright © European Association of Archaeologists 2017
References
Aimers, J.J., Farthing, D.J. & Shugar, A.N.
2012. Handheld XRF Analysis of Maya Ceramics: A Pilot Study Presenting Issues Related to Quantification and Calibration. In: Shugar, A.N. & Mass, J.L., eds. Handheld XRF for Art and Archaeology (Studies in Archaeological Science 3). Leuven: Leuven University Press, pp. 423–48.Google Scholar
Appadurai, A. ed. 1986. The Social Life of Things: Commodities in Cultural Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gell, A.
1998. Art and Agency: An Anthropological Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hodder, I.
2012. Entangled: An Archaeology of the Relationships between Humans and Things. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Frahm, E.
2013. Validity of ‘Off-The-Shelf’ Handheld Portable XRF for Sourcing Near Eastern Obsidian Chip Debris. Journal of Archaeological Science
40(2): 1080–92. doi:10.1016/j.jas.2012.06.038
Google Scholar
Frahm, E. & Doonan, R.C.
2013. The Technological versus Methodological Revolution of Portable XRF in Archaeology. Journal of Archaeological Science
40(2): 1425–34. doi:10.1016/j.jas.2012.10.013
CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knappett, C., Pirrie, D., Power, M.R., Nikolakopoulou, I., Hilditch, J. & Rollinson, G.K.
2011. Mineralogical Analysis and Provenancing of Ancient Ceramics using Automated SEM-EDS Analysis (QEMSCAN®): A Pilot Study on LB I Pottery from Akrotiri, Thera. Journal of Archaeological Science
38(2): 219‒32. doi: 10.1016/j.jas.2010.08.022
Google Scholar
Peacock, D.P.S.
1982. Pottery in the Roman World: An Ethnoarchaeological Approach. London & New York: Longman.Google Scholar
Peacock, D.P.S.
1997. La ceramica romana: tra archeologia ed etnografia. Bari: Edipuglia.Google Scholar
Speakman, R.J. & Shackley, M.S.
2013. Silo Science and Portable XRF in Archaeology: A Response to Frahm. Journal of Archaeological Science
40(2): 1435–43. doi:10.1016/j.jas.2012.09.033
Google Scholar