Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T17:24:13.827Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Biography and Memory: Sandal Castle and the English Civil War

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Rachel Askew
Rachel Askew*
Affiliation:
Department of Archaeology, University of Sheffield, UK
*
[email: [email protected]]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The post-medieval castle is often neglected in English archaeology, with most analyses focusing on whether the castle was built for status or defence, a debate which has become known as ‘the Battle for Bodiam’. However, in the English Civil War between 1642 and 1651, many castles were fortified either for King Charles I or his rebellious Parliament. Although the fortification of castles during this period is often attributed to acts of desperation and a lack of more suitable defences, an examination of the Royalist occupation of Sandal Castle in West Yorkshire demonstrates how this view is simplistic. The decision to fortify Sandal can be directly linked to the Battle of Wakefield in 1460, when Richard Plantagenet, Duke of York, the father of King Edward IV and Richard III, was killed outside its walls. This episode heavily influenced subsequent events, culminating in the occupation of the castle at the outbreak of the English Civil War. The importance of the past during this later conflict is reinforced by the faunal and artefactual assemblages, and the locations in which they were found (and consumed). The complexity of the social discourse at Sandal challenges current approaches in castle studies and highlights the need for a biographical approach which sees the interpretation and interaction of the castle through time and space as far more important than the motivations behind its initial construction. Such a way of proceeding complements existing methodologies but also relies on material culture and history to create a subtler interpretation of these complex buildings.

En Angleterre les châteaux d'époque postmédiévale font rarement l'objet d'études spécialisées En effet la plupart des recherches se concentrent sur la question de la fonction que remplissaient ces établissements (prestige ou défense) dans un débat qui a acquis le qualificatif de ‘Bataille de Bodiam’. Cependant de nombreux châteaux furent fortifiés pendant la Guerre civile anglaise entre 1642 et 1651, soit pour le compte du roi Charles I, soit du côté des forces parlementaires. Quoique la fortification des châteaux de cette époque soit souvent attribuée à un effort désespéré ou à un manque de sites adéquats, l'examen des niveaux d'occupation royaliste de Sandal Castle (West Yorkshire) révèle que ce point de vue est simpliste. La décision de fortifier Sandal Castle est à mettre en relation directe avec la Bataille de Wakefield en 1460, quand Richard Plantagenet, duc de York et père des futurs rois Edouard IV et Richard III trouva la mort devant ses murailles. Cet épisode a largement influencé les évènements ultérieurs, culminant avec l'occupation du château au début de la Guerre civile anglaise. L'importance que l'on accordait au passé au cours de ce dernier conflit se trouve confirmée par l'analyse des ensembles d'objets et d'ossements d'animaux ainsi que par leur distribution. La complexité du discours social observé à Sandal remet en cause les démarches classiques en castellologie et met l'accent sur la nécessité d'entreprendre une étude biographique axée sur l'interprétation des interactions du château à travers l'espace et le temps, plutôt que sur ce qui a motivé sa construction initiale. Cette façon de procéder complète les démarches actuelles en faisant usage de documents historiques et des vestiges de la culture matérielle, dans le but de présenter une interprétation plus nuancée de ces établissements fort complexes. Translation by Madeleine Hummler

Die nachmittelalterlichen Burgen sind in der englischen archäologischen Forschung oft vernachlässigt. Die meisten Studien beschäftigen sich mit der Frage, ob Burgen als Statussymbol oder als Befestigung gebaut wurden; diese Debatte kennt man unter dem Ausdruck, Kampf um Bodiam‘. Jedoch wurden zahlreiche Burgen im Englischen Bürgerkrieg zwischen 1642 und 1651 entweder für das Heer des Königs Karl I oder für die Truppen seiner parlamentarischen Gegner befestigt. Obwohl die Befestigung der Burgen häufig auf Verzweiflungstaten oder auf den Mangel an geeigneten Anlagen zurückgeführt wird, zeigt die Untersuchung der königstreuen Besetzung von Sandal Castle (West Yorkshire), dass solch ein Standpunkt die Lage zu vereinfachend darstellt. Man kann den Entschluss, Sandal zu befestigen, direkt mit der Schlacht von Wakefield in Zusammenhang bringen; dort wurde Richard Plantagenet, Herzog von York und Vater von Eduard IV und Richard III, in 1460 vor den Mauern der Burg getötet. Diese Gegebenheit hat weitere Ereignisse stark beeinflusst und hat mit der Besetzung der Burg am Anfang des Englischen Bürgerkrieges ihren Höhepunkt erreicht. Die Analyse der Funde und der Tierknochen sowie die Verbreitung der Befunde bestätigen, dass die Vergangenheit im letzteren Krieg eine große Bedeutung hatte. Die Komplexität des gesellschaftlichen Diskurses in Sandal stellt gängige Ansätze in der Burgenforschung infrage und zeigt, dass eine biografische Bewertung, die die Auswertung einer Burg hinsichtlich ihrer zeitlichen und räumlichen Wechselbeziehungen begünstigt, ein größeres Gewicht beigemessen werden sollte. Solch ein Ansatz ergänzt bekannte Verfahren, beruht aber auch auf eine Untersuchung der materiellen Kultur und der geschichtlichen Überlieferung um eine feinere Deutung von komplexen Anlagen zu bieten. Translation by Madeleine Hummler

Keywords

castle studiesEnglish Civil Warbiographymaterial culture studiesmedieval archaeologypost-medieval archaeologycastellologieGuerre civile anglaisebiographieculture matériellearchéologie médiévalearchéologie postmédiévaleBurgenforschungEnglischer BürgerkriegBiographiematerielle Kulturmittelalterliche Archäologienachmittelalterliche Archäologie
Type
Articles
Information
European Journal of Archaeology , Volume 19 , Issue 1 , 2016 , pp. 48 - 67
Copyright
Copyright © 2015 the European Association of Archaeologists 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adamson, J.S.A. 1990. The Baronial Context of the English Civil War. Transactions of the Royal Historical Society, 40: 93–120.Google Scholar
Albarella, U., Davis, S.J.M. 1996. Mammals and Birds from Launceston Castle, Cornwall: Decline in Status and the Rise of Agriculture. Circaea, 12 (1): 1–156.Google Scholar
Allen Brown, R., Colvin, H.M., Taylor, A.J. 1963. The History of the King's Works. Volume I: the Middle Ages. London: HMSO.Google Scholar
Askew, R.M.C. 2013. ‘The House of Every One’: The Consumption of Material Culture in Castles during the English Civil War. PhD dissertation, University of Sheffield. Available at: http://etheses.whiterose.ac.uk/4748/ [accessed 14 May 2015].Google Scholar
Bishop, G. (pub.) 1645. The Parliaments Post Faithfully Communicating to the Kingdome the Proceedings of the Armies on both Sides. Number 21, 30 September–7 October 1645. London. Thomason Tract 50:E.304[6].Google Scholar
Boardman, A. 2000. The Historical Background to the Battle and the Documentary Evidence. In: Fiorato, V., Boylston, A., Knüsel, C., eds. Blood Red Roses: The Archaeology of a Mass Grave from the Battle of Towton AD1641. Oxford: Oxbow, pp. 15–28.Google Scholar
Bottomley, F. 1979. The Castle Explorer's Guide: A Guide to Everything There is to Know about Exploring Castles in England, Scotland and Wales. London: Bracken Books.Google Scholar
Bourgeois, L. ed. 2009. Une résidence des comtes d'Angoulême autour de l'an Mil: le castrum d'Andone (Villejoubert, Charente). Caen: Publications du CRAHM.Google Scholar
Brady, A. 2006. Dying with Honour: Literary Propaganda and the Second English Civil War. The Journal of Military History, 70 (1): 9–30.Google Scholar
Brears, P.C.D. 1983. The Post-Medieval Pottery. In: Mayes, P., Butler, L.A.S., eds. Sandal Castle Excavations 1964–1973: A Detailed Archaeological Report. Wakefield: Wakefield Historical Publications, pp. 215–24.Google Scholar
Butler, L.A.S. 1983. History of the Site. In: Mayes, P., Butler, L.A.S., eds. Sandal Castle Excavations 1964–1973: A Detailed Archaeological Report. Wakefield: Wakefield Historical Publications, pp. 3–8.Google Scholar
Camden, W. 1610. Britain, or A Chorographicall Description of the Most Flourishing Kingdomes …. London: Bishop & Norton (originally published in Latin in 1586, translated by P. Holland).Google Scholar
Carlton, C. 1992. Going to the Wars: the Experience of the British Civil Wars 1638–1651. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Colvin, H.M., Ransome, D.R., Summerson, J. 1975. The History of the King's Works. Volume III 1485–1660 (Part I). London: HMSO.Google Scholar
Coulson, C.L.H. 1992. Some Analysis of the Castle of Bodiam, East Sussex. Medieval Knighthood, 4: 51–107.Google Scholar
Coulson, C.L.H. 2003. Castles in Medieval Society: Fortresses in England, France, and Ireland in the Central Middle Ages. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Courtney, P. 1997. The Tyranny of Constructs: Some Thoughts on Periodisation and Culture Change. In: Gaimster, D., Stamper, P., eds. The Age of Transition: The Archaeology of English Culture 1400–1600 (The Society for Medieval Archaeology Monograph 15). Oxford: Oxbow, pp. 9–23.Google Scholar
Credland, A.G. 1983. Military Finds. In: Mayes, P., Butler, L.A.S., eds. Sandal Castle Excavations 1964–1973: A Detailed Archaeological Report. Wakefield: Wakefield Historical Publications, pp. 259–66.Google Scholar
Creighton, O. 2003. Castles and Landscapes: Power, Community and Fortification in Medieval England. London: Equinox.Google Scholar
Creighton, O. 2008. Castle Studies and Archaeology in England: Towards a Research Framework for the Future. Château Gaillard, 23: 79–90.Google Scholar
Creighton, O., Liddiard, R. 2008. Fighting Yesterday's Battle: Beyond War or Status in Castle Studies. Medieval Archaeology, 52: 161–69.Google Scholar
Cressy, D. 1989. Bonfires and Bells: National Memory and the Protestant Calendar in Elizabethan and Stuart England. London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson.Google Scholar
de Clercq, W., Caluwé, D., Cooremans, B., de Buyser, F., de Groote, K., Deforce, K., Ervynck, A., Lentacker, A., Mortier, S., Pype, P., Vandenberghe, S., van Neer, W., Wouters, H. 2007. Living in Times of War: Waste of c.1600 from Two Garderobe Chutes in the Castle of Middelburg-in-Flanders (Belgium). Post-Medieval Archaeology, 41 (1): 1–63.Google Scholar
Dixon, P. 1990. The Donjon of Knaresborough: The Castle as Theatre. Château Gaillard, 14: 121–39.Google Scholar
Dumas, S., Vedel-Petersen, K.O. 1923. Losses of Life Caused by War. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Eaves, I. 1989. On the Remains of a Jack of Plate Excavated from Beeston Castle in Cheshire. The Journal of the Arms and Armour Society, 8 (2): 81–154.Google Scholar
Eaves, I. 2002. Arms, Armour and Militaria. In: Roberts, I., ed. Pontefract Castle: Archaeological Excavations 1982–1986 (Yorkshire Archaeology 8). Wakefield: West Yorkshire Archaeology Service, pp. 324–55.Google Scholar
Ellis, H. ed. 1853. Letters from a Subaltern Officer of the Earl of Essex's Army. Archaeologia, 35: 310–34.Google Scholar
Everson, P. 1996. Bodiam Castle, East Sussex: Castle and its Designed Landscape. Château Gaillard, 17: 79–84.Google Scholar
Fox, G. 1987. The Three Sieges of Pontefract Castle. Leeds: Old Hall Press.Google Scholar
Gaimster, D., Boland, P., Linnane, S., Cartwright, C. 1996. The Archaeology of Private Life: The Dudley Castle Condoms. Post-Medieval Archaeology, 30: 129–42.Google Scholar
Gairdner, J. ed. 1892. Letters and Papers, Foreign and Domestic, Henry VIII, Volume 13 Part 1: January–July 1538. London: HMSO.Google Scholar
Gaunt, P. 1987. The Cromwellian Gazetteer: An Illustrated Guide to Britain in the Civil War and Commonwealth. Stroud: Sutton.Google Scholar
Gentles, I. 2007. The English Revolution and the Wars in the Three Kingdoms, 1638–1652. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Gilchrist, R. 1999. Gender and Archaeology: Contesting the Past. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Giles, K. 2007. Seeing and Believing: Visuality and Space in Pre-Modern England. World Archaeology, 39 (1): 105–21.Google Scholar
Goodall, J. 2011. The English Castle. London: Paul Mellon Centre for Studies in British Art.Google Scholar
Gosden, C., Marshall, Y. 1999. The Cultural Biography of Objects. World Archaeology, 31 (2): 169–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Griffith, N.J.L., Halstead, P.L.J., MacLean, A.C., Rowley-Conwy, P.A. 1983. Faunal Remains and Economy. In: Mayes, P., Butler, L., eds. Sandal Castle Excavations 1964–1973: A Detailed Archaeological Report. Wakefield: Wakefield Historical Publications, pp. 341–48.Google Scholar
Haigh, P.A. 1995. The Military Campaigns of the Wars of the Roses. Stroud: Sutton.Google Scholar
Hallam, E.M. 1983. Monasteries as ‘War Memorials': Battle Abbey and La Victoire. In: Sheils, W.J., ed. The Church and War: Papers Read at the Twenty-first Summer Meeting and the Twenty-second Winter Meeting of the Ecclesiastical History Society. Oxford: Blackwell for The Ecclesiastical History Society, pp. 47–57.Google Scholar
Heylyn, P. (ed.), 1643. Mercurius Aulicus. 22nd week, 3 June 1643. Oxford. Thomason Tract 19:E.106[2].Google Scholar
Holtorf, C. 2002. Notes on the Life History of a Pot Sherd. Journal of Material Culture, 7 (1): 49–71.Google Scholar
Horrox, R., Hammond, P.W. 1979. British Library Harleian Manuscript 433: Volume 1. Gloucester: A. Sutton for The Richard III Society.Google Scholar
Horrox, R., Hammond, P.W. 1980. British Library Harleian Manuscript 433: Volume 2. Gloucester: A. Sutton for The Richard III Society.Google Scholar
Horrox, R., Hammond, P.W. 1982. British Library Harleian Manuscript 433: Volume 3. Gloucester: A. Sutton for The Richard III Society.Google Scholar
Humphrys, J. 2007. Enemies at the Gate: English Castles under Siege from the 12th Century to the Civil War. Swindon: English Heritage.Google Scholar
Hutton, R., Reeves, W. 1998. Sieges and Fortifications. In: Kenyon, J., & Ohlmeyer, J., eds. The Civil Wars: a Military History of England, Scotland and Ireland 1638–1660. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 195–233.Google Scholar
Jervis, B. 2014. Pottery and Social Life in Medieval England: Towards a Relational Approach. Oxford: Oxbow.Google Scholar
Johnson, M. 2002. Behind the Castle Gate: From Medieval to Renaissance. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Johnson, M. 2013. What do Medieval Buildings Mean? History and Theory, 52: 380–99.Google Scholar
Kenyon, J.R. 1982. The Civil War Earthworks around Raglan Castle, Gwent: An Aerial View. Archaeologia Cambrensis, 131: 139–42.Google Scholar
Kenyon, J.R. 1990. Medieval Fortifications. Leicester: Leicester University Press.Google Scholar
Koptyoff, I. 1986. The Cultural Biography of Things: Commoditization as Process. In: Appadurai, A., ed. The Social Life of Things: Commodities in Cultural Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 64–91.Google Scholar
Krauskopf, C. 2006. Just Noble Things? Studies on the Material Culture of 13th and 14th Century Nobility. Château Gaillard, 22: 195–204.Google Scholar
Landewé, W. 2010. The Image of the Castle: The Castle as a Motif in Medieval Marriage Ideology. Château Gaillard, 24: 165–72.Google Scholar
Liddiard, R. 2005. Castles in Context: Power, Symbolism and Landscape, 1066 to 1500. Macclesfield: Windgather.Google Scholar
Mayes, P., Butler, L.A.S. 1983. Sandal Castle Excavations 1964–1973: A Detailed Archaeological Report. Wakefield: Wakefield Historical Publications.Google Scholar
Miller, D. 2002. Coca-Cola: A Black Sweet Drink from Trinidad. In: Büchli, V., ed. The Material Culture Reader. London: Berg, pp. 245–63.Google Scholar
Moffett, L. 1992. Fruits, Vegetables, Herbs and Other Plants from the Latrine at Dudley Castle in Central England, Used by the Royalist Garrison during the Civil War. Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology, 73: 271–86.Google Scholar
Moorhouse, S. 1978. Documentary Evidence for the Uses of Medieval Pottery: An Interim Statement. Medieval Ceramics, 2: 3–21.Google Scholar
Moorhouse, S. 1983a. The Pottery. In: Mayes, P., Butler, L.A.S., eds. Sandal Castle Excavations 1964–1973: A Detailed Archaeological Report. Wakefield: Wakefield Historical Publications, pp. 83–212.Google Scholar
Moorhouse, S. 1983b. Documentary Evidence and its Potential for Understanding the Inland Movement of Medieval Pottery. Medieval Ceramics, 7: 45–87.Google Scholar
Moorhouse, S. 1986. Non-Dating Uses of Medieval Pottery. Medieval Ceramics, 10: 85–123.Google Scholar
Moreland, J. 1999. The World(s) of the Cross. World Archaeology, 31 (2): 194–213.Google Scholar
Morrill, J. 1993. The Nature of the English Revolution. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Mytum, H. 2010a. Biographies of Projects, People and Places: Archaeologists and William and Martha Harries at Henllys Farm, Pembrokeshire. Post-Medieval Archaeology, 44 (2): 294–319.Google Scholar
O'Keeffe, T. 2001. Concepts of ‘Castle’ and the Construction of Identity in Medieval and Post-Medieval Ireland. Irish Geography, 34 (1): 69–88.Google Scholar
Page, W. 1895. The Certificates of the Commissioners Appointed to Survey the Chantries, Guilds, Hospitals, etc., in the County of York: Part II (Publications of the Surtees Society Volume 92). Durham: Andrews for The Surtees Society.Google Scholar
Paulden, T. 1702. Pontefract Castle. An Account How it was Taken: and How General Rainsborough was Surprised in his Quarters at Doncaster, Anno 1648…. By Captain Tho. Paulden. London: Printed by Edward Jones.Google Scholar
Pettifer, A. 1995. English Castles: A Guide by Counties. Woodbridge: Boydell Press.Google Scholar
Platt, C. 1982. The Castle in Medieval England and Wales. London: Secker & Warburg.Google Scholar
Platt, C. 2007. Revisionism in Castle Studies: A Caution. Medieval Archaeology, 51: 83–102.Google Scholar
Porter, S. 1994. Destruction in the English Civil Wars. Stroud: Sutton.Google Scholar
Poulain, M., de Groote, K., de Clercq, W. 2013. Pots from Troublesome Times: Ceramics Used in Middelburg-in-Flanders, Belgium, during the Eighty Years' War. Medieval Ceramics, 34: 1–18.Google Scholar
Prior, C.W.A., Burgess, G. eds. 2011. England's Wars of Religion, Revisited. Farnham: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Quinn, J.M.V. 1992. ‘These Unhappy Warres': The Civil War and Pontefract. Pontefract: Cluny.Google Scholar
Rakoczy, L. 2007. Archaeology of Destruction: a Reinterpretation of Castle Slightings in the English Civil War. PhD dissertation, University of York. Available at http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.502972 [accessed 14 May 2015].Google Scholar
Ratkai, S. 1985. The Medieval Pottery from Dudley Castle. West Midlands Pottery Research Group Newsletter, 5: no pagination.Google Scholar
Ratkai, S. 1987. The Post-Medieval Coarsewares from the Motte and Keep of Dudley Castle. Staffordshire Archaeological Studies, 4: 1–11.Google Scholar
Richardson, A. 2003. Gender and Space in English Royal Palaces c. 1160–c. 1547: A Study in Access Analysis and Imagery. Medieval Archaeology, 47: 131–65.Google Scholar
Richardson, J. 2002. The Mammal Bones. In: Roberts, I., ed. Pontefract Castle: Archaeological Excavations 1982–1986 (Yorkshire Archaeology 8). Wakefield: West Yorkshire Archaeology Service, pp. 363–85.Google Scholar
Roberts, I. 2002. Pontefract Castle: Archaeological Excavations 1982–1986 (Yorkshire Archaeology 8). Wakefield: West Yorkshire Archaeology Service.Google Scholar
Rosenthal, J.T. 1964. Richard, Duke of York: A Fifteenth-Century Layman and The Church. The Catholic Historical Review, 50 (2): 171–87.Google Scholar
Ross, C. 1981. Richard III. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Soderberg, J. 2004. Wild Cattle: Red Deer in the Religious Texts, Iconography, and Archaeology of Early Medieval Ireland. International Journal of Historical Archaeology, 8 (3): 167–83.Google Scholar
Stubbes, K., Butler, L. 1971. Sandal Castle Wakefield, Yorkshire: Excavations 1971. Unpublished typewritten notes in the excavation archive held by Wakefield Museums Service.Google Scholar
Sutherland, T.L., Schmidt, A. 2003. Towton, 1461: An Integrated Approach to Battlefield Archaeology. Landscapes, 2: 15–25.Google Scholar
Svensson, E. 2008. The Medieval Household: Daily Life in Castles and Farmsteads. Turnhout: Brepols.Google Scholar
Sykes, N. 2005. Hunting for the Anglo-Normans: Zooarchaeological Evidence for Medieval Identity. In: Pluskowski, A., ed. Just Skin and Bones? New Perspectives on Human-Animal Relations in the Historical Past (BAR International Series 1410). Oxford: Archaeopress, pp. 73–80.Google Scholar
Sykes, N. 2007. Taking Sides: The Social Life of Venison in Medieval England. In: Pluskowski, A., ed. Breaking and Shaping Beastly Bodies: Animals as Material Culture in the Middle Ages. Oxford: Oxbow, pp. 149–60.Google Scholar
Taylor, C., Everson, P., Wilson-North, R. 1990. Bodiam Castle, Sussex. Medieval Archaeology, 34: 155–57.Google Scholar
Tennant, P. 1992. Edgehill and Beyond: The People's War in the South Midlands, 1642–1645. Sutton: The Banbury Historical Society, Vol. 23.Google Scholar
Thomas, R. 2005. Animals, Economy and Status: Integrating Zooarchaeological and Historical Data in the Study of Dudley Castle, West Midlands (c. 1100–1750) (BAR British Series 392). Oxford: Archaeopress.Google Scholar
Thomas, R. 2007. Chasing the Ideal? Ritualism, Pragmatism and the Later Medieval Hunt. In: Pluskowski, A., ed. Breaking and Shaping Beastly Bodies: Animals as Material Culture in the Middle Ages. Oxford: Oxbow, pp. 161–69.Google Scholar
Thompson, M.W. 1987. The Decline of the Castle. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Uotila, K. 2004. The Changing Roles of Outer Baileys in Finnish Castles. Château Gaillard, 21: 281–89.Google Scholar
Walbancke, M. (pub.) 1645. A diary, or, An Exact Iournall Faithfully Communicating the Most Remarkable Proceedings in Both Houses of Parliament. Number 3, 2nd–9th October 1645. London. Thomason Tract 50:E.304[13].Google Scholar
Walker, A. ed. 1997. The First and Second Siege of Pontefract Castle: Nathan Drake's Diary. Pontefract: Gosling.Google Scholar
Warner, P. 1971. The Medieval Castle: Life in a Fortress in Peace and War. London: Arthur Baker.Google Scholar
Wheatley, A. 2004. The Idea of the Castle in Medieval England. York: York Medieval Press.Google Scholar
Willmott, H.B., Bryson, A. 2013. Changing to Suit the Times: A Post-Dissolution History of Monk Bretton Priory, South Yorkshire. Post-Medieval Archaeology, 47 (1): 136–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Winter, J.M. 1977. Britain's ‘Lost Generation’ of the First World War. Population Studies, 31 (3): 449–66.Google Scholar
Wood, A. 2013. The Memory of the People: Custom and Popular Senses of the Past in Early Modern England. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Woolgar, C.M. 1999. The Great Household in Late Medieval England. London: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Woolgar, C.M. 2007. The Senses in Late Medieval England. London: Yale University Press.Google Scholar