Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T03:10:26.607Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Age and Context of the KC4 Maxilla, Kent's Cavern, UK

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 January 2017

Chris Proctor ,
Katerina Douka ,
Janet W. Proctor  and
Tom Higham
Chris Proctor
Affiliation:
Torquay Museum, Torquay, UK
Katerina Douka
Affiliation:
Oxford Radiocarbon Accelerator Unit, University of Oxford, UK
Janet W. Proctor
Affiliation:
Torbay Libraries, Torquay, UK
Tom Higham
Affiliation:
Oxford Radiocarbon Accelerator Unit, University of Oxford, UK Keble College, Oxford, UK
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Kent's Cavern is one of Britain's most important Palaeolithic sites. The Torquay Natural History Society excavations in the Vestibule (1926–1928 and 1932–1938) yielded Middle and Early Upper Palaeolithic deposits as well as a fragment of human jaw (KC4). Higham et al. (2011) recently identified it as the oldest modern human fossil known from North West Europe, with a date estimated, using Bayesian modelling, at 44,200–41,500 cal bp (at 95.4% probability). However, White and Pettitt (2012) and Zilhão (2013) have claimed that the poor quality of the excavations and lack of stratigraphic integrity cast doubt on the archaeological and dating evidence from the site. Here, we present a thorough re-analysis of the excavations and show that they were in fact conducted to a reasonable standard. We also carefully examine the stratigraphic and sedimentological sequence and present twelve new AMS determinations from key contexts to test the previous model and chronology. We find that, while Trench C has good stratigraphic integrity, there is some evidence of post-depositional disruption of certain parts; some post-depositional movement is also shown by a limited number of artefact refits. There are two outlying AMS determinations dating to c. 32,000 bp. We therefore cannot exclude completely the possibility that the maxilla's age could be younger than the published probability distribution function (PDF). Our analysis lends support to the assessment by Higham et al. (2011) of the site and KC4 and shows that it offers considerable potential for future study.

Kent's Cavern est un des sites paléolithiques les plus importants de Grande Bretagne. Des fouilles entreprises entre 1926 et 1928 et de 1932 à 1938 par la Torquay Natural History Society dans le vestibule de cette grotte ont révélé des couches du Paléolithique Moyen et du début du Paléolithique Supérieur ainsi qu'un fragment de maxillaire humain (KC4). Il y a quelques années Higham et al. (2011) ont déterminé qu'il s'agissait du fragment de squelette le plus ancien d'Europe du nord-ouest, sur la base d'une datation (utilisant une modélisation statistique bayésienne) estimée autour de 44,200–41,500 cal bp (à 95,4% de probabilité). Mais White et Pettitt (2012) ainsi que Zilhão (2013) ont affirmé que la qualité médiocre des fouilles et le manque d'intégrité stratigraphique mettent en doute les données archéologiques et chronologiques provenant du site. Notre article contient une nouvelle analyse de ces fouilles qui démontre qu'elles avaient été relativement bien effectuées. Nous examinons également en détail la séquence stratigraphique et sédimentologie et publions 12 nouvelles dates radiocarbone AMS provenant de contextes clefs pour la vérification de la chronologie et de l'interprétation proposées précédemment. Il en ressort que la tranchée C n'est pas compromise du point de vue stratigraphique mais que certaines parties avaient été remaniées ultérieurement; le remontage d'une quantité restreinte d'objets témoigne aussi que certains remaniements avaient eu lieu après déposition. Deux dates AMS autour de 32,000 bp sortent du cadre chronologique proposé. Nous ne pouvons donc pas exclure catégoriquement que le maxillaire soit plus récent que la fonction de densité de probabilité (PDF) publiée. Nos analyses corroborent l’évaluation du site et de KC4 publiée par Higham et al. (2011) et laissent penser qu'il existe un potentiel considérable pour des études ultérieures. Translation by Madeleine Hummler

Kent's Cavern ist eine der bedeutendsten paläolithischen Fundstätten in Großbritannien. Die Torquay Natural History Society hat von 1926 bis 1928 und zwischen 1932 und 1938 Ausgrabungen im Vestibül der Höhle durchgeführt und dort Schichten des Mittelpaläolithikums und frühen Jungpaläolithikums, und auch das Bruchstück eines menschlichen Oberkiefers (KC4) aufgedeckt. Letztlich haben Higham et al. (2011) bestimmt, dass es sich um das älteste bekannte menschliche Fossil aus Nordwesteuropa handelt, und haben es, dank einer bayesschen Modellierung, um 44,200–41,500 cal bp datiert (mit 95,4 % Wahrscheinlichkeit). White und Pettitt (2012) und Zilhão (2013) haben aber behauptet, dass die Qualität der Ausgrabungen nicht genügend war und dass die Stratigrafie mangelhaft war, sodass die archäologischen Befunde und chronologischen Belege wohl bezweifelt werden müssen. Der vorliegende Artikel enthält eine grundsätzliche neue Analyse der Ausgrabungen; es wird hier gezeigt, dass diese relativ gut durchgeführt worden waren. Wir haben auch die stratigrafische und sedimentologische Nachfolge sorgfältig untersucht und veröffentlichen 12 neue AMS-Radiokarbondatierungen von Kontexten, die maßgebend für die Überprüfung der veröffentlichten Chronologie und Modells sind. Es lässt sich daraus schließen, dass Schnitt C stratigrafisch zuverlässig ist. Störungen nach der Ablagerung sind aber auch in gewissen Teilen der Grabung belegt und Bewegungen von Material nach der Ablagerung sind auch durch die Wiederzusammenfügung von bestimmten Artefakten nachgewiesen. Zwei AMS-Datierungen von ca. 32,000 bp fallen aus dem Rahmen. Es kann also nicht kategorisch ausgeschlossen werden, dass das Alter des KC4 Oberkiefers jünger als die veröffentlichte Wahrscheinlichkeitsdichtefunktion (WDF = PDF) sein kann. Die Ergebnisse unserer Untersuchungen unterstützen die Auswertung des Befundes und des Oberkiefers KC4 von Higham et al. (2011) und zeigen, dass es potenziell noch viele Möglichkeiten gibt, weitere Untersuchungen durchzuführen. Translation by Madeleine Hummler

Keywords

Kent's CavernTorquay Natural History SocietyAMS radiocarbon datingPalaeolithic archaeologyKC4 maxillaultrafiltrationBayesian modellingKent's CavernTorquay Natural History Societydatation radiocarbone AMSarchéologie du Paléolithiquemaxillaire KC4ultrafiltrationmodélisation statistique bayésienneStichworteKent's CavernTorquay Natural History SocietyAMS Radiokarbondatierungpaläolithische ArchäologieOberkiefer KC4Ultrafiltrationbayessche Modellierung
Type
Articles
Information
European Journal of Archaeology , Volume 20 , Issue 1 , February 2017 , pp. 74 - 97
Copyright
Copyright © European Association of Archaeologists 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Beynon, F. & Ogilvie, A.H. 1930. Kent's Cavern, Torquay. Report of the 97th Meeting of the British Association, South Africa, 1929: 265–66.Google Scholar
Beynon, F. & Ogilvie, A.H. 1931. Kent's Cavern. Report of the 98th Meeting of the British Association, Bristol, 1930: 266–67.Google Scholar
Beynon, F. & Ogilvie, A.H. 1932a. Kent's Cavern. Report of the Centenary Meeting of the British Association, London, 1931: 273–74.Google Scholar
Beynon, F. & Ogilvie, A.H. 1932b. Kent's Cavern, Torquay. British Association, Report of the Annual Meeting, 1932, York: 289–90.Google Scholar
Beynon, F. & Ogilvie, A.H. 1932–1938. Kent's Cavern Excavation Journal 2. Unpublished manuscript, Torquay Museum AR 4263.Google Scholar
Beynon, F. & Ogilvie, A.H. 1933. Kent's Cavern, Torquay. British Association, Report of the Annual Meeting, 1933, Leicester: 301–02.Google Scholar
Beynon, F. & Ogilvie, A.H. 1934. Kent's Cavern, Torquay. British Association, Report of the Annual Meeting, 1934, Aberdeen: 258.Google Scholar
Beynon, F. & Ogilvie, A.H. 1935. Kent's Cavern. British Association, Report of the annual meeting, 1935, Norwich: 334–35.Google Scholar
Beynon, F. & Ogilvie, A.H. 1936. Kent's Cavern. British Association, Report of the Annual Meeting, 1936, Blackpool: 303–04.Google Scholar
Beynon, F., Ogilvie, A.H. & Dowie, H.G. 1926. Kent's Cavern, Torquay. Report of the 94th Meeting of the British Association, Oxford, 1926: 326–28.Google Scholar
Beynon, F., Dowie, H.G. & Ogilvie, A.H. 1926–1932. Kent's Cavern Exploration Journal 1. Unpublished manuscript, Torquay Museum AR 4262.Google Scholar
Beynon, F., Dowie, H.G. & Ogilvie, A.H. 1929a. Kent's Cavern, Torquay. Report of the 96th Meeting of the British Association, Glasgow, 1928: 434–36.Google Scholar
Beynon, F., Dowie, H.G. & Ogilvie, A.H. 1929b. Report on the Excavations in Kent's Cavern 1926–9. Torquay Natural History Society Transactions and Proceedings, 5: 237–42.Google Scholar
Brock, F., Higham, T.F.G., Ditchfield, P and Bronk Ramsey, C. 2010. Current Pretreatment Methods for AMS Radiocarbon Dating at the Oxford Radiocarbon Accelerator Unit (ORAU). Radiocarbon, 52(1): 103–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bronk Ramsey, C. 2009. Bayesian Analysis of Radiocarbon Dates. Radiocarbon, 51(1): 337–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bronk Ramsey, C, Higham, T.F.G, Bowles, A. and Hedges, R. 2004. Improvements to the Pretreatment of Bone at Oxford. Radiocarbon, 46(1): 155–63.Google Scholar
Campbell, J.B. & Sampson, C.G. 1971. A New Analysis of Kent's Cavern, Devonshire, England. University of Oregon Anthropological Papers, 3: 1–40.Google Scholar
Dinnis, R. & Proctor, C.J. 2015. (Re)discovery of a Major Cave Entrance at Kent's Cavern, Devon, UK. Cave & Karst Science, 42: 58–9.Google Scholar
Donovan, D.T. 1985. Records, Catalogues and Layers at Gough's Cave. Proceedings of the University of Bristol Spelaeological Society, 17(2): 116–19.Google Scholar
Donovan, D.T. 2005. Aveline's Hole, Burrington Combe, North Somerset: Stratigraphy and Problems. Proceedings of the University of Bristol Spelaeological Society, 23(3): 159–70.Google Scholar
Dowie, H.G. 1925. The Excavation of a Cave at Torbryan. Torquay Natural History Society Transactions and Proceedings, 4(3): 261–68.Google Scholar
Dowie, H.G. 1928. Note on Recent Excavations in Kent's Cavern, Torquay. Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society of East Anglia, 5(30): 306–07.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dowie, H.G. 1930. Note on Operations Outside the Entrance to Kent's Cavern, 1928–9. Report of the 97th Meeting of the British Association, South Africa, 1929: 266.Google Scholar
Dowie, H.G. & Ogilvie, A.H. 1927. Kent's Cavern, Torquay. Report of the 95th Meeting of the British Association, Leeds, 1927: 303–06.Google Scholar
Garrod, D.A.E. 1926. The Upper Palaeolithic Age in Britain. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Hedges, R.E.M., Housley, R.A., Law, I.A. & Bronk, C.R. 1989. Radiocarbon Dates from the Oxford AMS System: Archaeometry Datelist 9. Archaeometry, 31: 207–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Higham, T.F.G. 2011. European Middle and Upper Palaeolithic Radiocarbon Dates Are Often Older than they Look: Problems with Previous Dates and Some Remedies. Antiquity, 85: 235–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Higham, T., Jacobi, R. & Bronk Ramsey, C. 2006. AMS Radiocarbon Dating of Ancient Bone Using Ultrafiltration. Radiocarbon, 48(2): 179–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Higham, T., Compton, T., Stringer, C., Jacobi, R., Shapiro, B., Trinkaus, E., Chandler, B., Groning, F., Collins, C., Hillson, S., O'Higgins, P., Fitzgerald, C. & Fagan, M. 2011. The Earliest Evidence for Anatomically Modern Humans in Northwestern Europe. Nature, 479: 521–24.Google Scholar
Jacobi, R.M. 1985. The History and Literature of Pleistocene Discoveries at Gough's Cave, Cheddar, Somerset. Proceedings of the University of Bristol Spelaeological Society, 17(2): 102–15.Google Scholar
Jacobi, R.M. 2007. A Collection of Early Upper Palaeolithic Artefacts from Beedings, near Pulborough, West Sussex, and the Context of Similar Finds from the British Isles. Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society, 73: 229–25.Google Scholar
Jacobi, R. & Higham, T. 2009. Radiocarbon Dating of the Later Upper Palaeolithic Human Occupation of Kent's Cavern, Devon, England: New AMS Results. In: Burdukiewicz, J.M., Cyrek, K., Dyczek, P. & Szymczak, K., eds. Understanding the Past: Papers Offered to Stefan K. Kozlowski. Warsaw: Center for Research on the Antiquity of Southeastern Europe, pp. 137–54.Google Scholar
Jacobi, R. & Higham, T. 2011. The British Earlier Upper Palaeolithic: Settlement and Chronology. In: Ashton, N.M., Lewis, S.G. & Stringer, C.B., eds. The Ancient Human Occupation of Britain. Amsterdam: Elsevier, pp. 181–222.Google Scholar
Jacobi, R.M., Rowe, P.J., Gilmour, M.A., Grun, R. & Atkinson, T.C. 1998. Radiometric Dating of the Middle Palaeolithic Tool Industry and Associated Fauna of Pin Hole Cave, Creswell Crags, England. Journal of Quaternary Science, 13 (1): 29–42.Google Scholar
Keith, A. 1927. Report on a Fragment of a Human Jaw. Torquay Natural History Society Transactions and Proceedings, 5: 1–2.Google Scholar
Lake, P.M.B. 1934. A New Plan of Kent's Cavern. Torquay Natural History Society Transactions & Proceedings, 6: 331–32 & plan.Google Scholar
Lundberg, J. & McFarlane, D.A. 2005. The 19th Century Excavation of Kent's Cavern, England. Journal of Cave and Karst Studies, 67(1): 39–47.Google Scholar
Ogilvie, A.H. 1938–1941. Kent's Cavern Excavation Journal 3. Unpublished manuscript, Torquay Museum AR 4267.Google Scholar
Ogilvie, A.H. & Tebbs, B.N. 1938. Kent's Cavern. British Association, Report of the Annual Meeting, 1938, Cambridge: 347.Google Scholar
Ogilvie, A.H., Rogers, E.H. & Tebbs, B.N. 1937. Kent's Cavern. British Association, Report of the Annual Meeting, 1937, Nottingham: 299.Google Scholar
Pengelly, W. 1864–1879. Journal of the Exploration of Kent's Cavern, Torquay. Unpublished manuscript, Torquay Museum.Google Scholar
Pengelly, W. 1884. The Literature of Kent's Cavern, Part V. Transactions of the Devonshire Association, 14: 189–343.Google Scholar
Pettitt, P. & Jacobi, R. 2009. The Palaeolithic Archaeology of Creswell Crags. In: Bahn, P. & Pettitt, P., Britain's Oldest Art. The Ice Age Cave Art of Creswell Crags. Swindon: English Heritage, pp. 16–35.Google Scholar
Proctor, C.J. 1995. A British Pleistocene Chronology Based on Uranium Series and Electron Spin Resonance Dating of Speleothem (unpublished PhD thesis, University of Bristol).Google Scholar
Reimer, P.J., Bard, E., Bayliss, A., Beck, J.W., Blackwell, P.G., Bronk Ramsey, C., Grootes, P.M., Guilderson, T.P., Haflidason, H., Hajdas, I., Hatté, C., Heaton, T.J., Hoffmann, D.L., Hogg, A.G., Hughen, K.A., Kaiser, K.F., Kromer, B., Manning, S.W., Niu, Mu, Reimer, R.W., Richards, D.A., Scott, E.M., Southon, J.R., Staff, R.A., Turney, C.S.M. & van der Plicht., J. 2013. IntCal13 and Marine13 Radiocarbon Age Calibration Curves 0–50,000 Years cal BP. Radiocarbon 55(4): 1869–87.Google Scholar
Roberts, A. 1999. The Path Not Taken: Dorothy Garrod, Devon and the British Palaeolithic. In: Davies, W. & Charles, R., eds. Dorothy Garrod and the Progress of the Palaeolithic. Studies in the Prehistoric Archaeology of the Near East and Europe. Oxford: Oxbow Books, pp. 19–31.Google Scholar
Smith, R.A. 1940. Some Recent Finds in Kent's Cavern. Torquay Natural History Society Transactions and Proceedings, 8: 59–60.Google Scholar
Street, M., Terberger, T. & Orschiedt, J. 2006. A Critical Review of the German Paleolithic Hominin Record. Journal of Human Evolution, 51: 551–79.Google Scholar
Stuiver, M. and Polach, H.A. 1977. Discussion: Reporting of 14C Data. Radiocarbon 19: 355–63.Google Scholar
Tingley, N. & Chandler, B. 2008. The TNHS Excavations at Kent's Cavern 1926–41. Unpublished manuscript. Torquay Museum.Google Scholar
White, M. & Pettitt, P. 2012. Ancient Digs and Modern Myths: The Age and Context of the Kent's Cavern 4 Maxilla and the Earliest Homo Sapiens Specimens in Europe. European Journal of Archaeology, 15(3): 392–420.Google Scholar
Wood, R.E., Bronk Ramsey, C. & Higham, T.F.G. 2010. Refining the Ultrafiltration Bone Pretreatment Background for Radiocarbon Dating at ORAU. Radiocarbon, 52(2–3): 600–11.Google Scholar
Zilhão, J. 2013. Neandertal-Modern Human Contact in Western Eurasia: Issues of Dating, Taxonomy, and Cultural Associations. In: Akazawa, T., Nishiaki, Y. & Aoki, K., eds. Dynamics of Learning in Neanderthals and Modern Humans Volume 1: Cultural Perspectives. Replacement of Neanderthals by Modern Humans Series. Japan: Springer, pp. DOI 10.1007/978-4-431-54511-8_3 Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Proctor supplementary material

Proctor supplementary material 1

Download Proctor supplementary material(File)
File 60.8 KB
Supplementary material: File

Proctor supplementary material

Proctor supplementary material 2

Download Proctor supplementary material(File)
File 44.5 KB