Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-06T06:52:34.012Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Thomas Bateman, Crania Britannica, and Archaeological Chronology

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 June 2017

Deborah Harlan
Deborah Harlan*
Affiliation:
Department of Archaeology, University of Sheffield, UK
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article explores the importance of the Derbyshire antiquarian Thomas Bateman in the context of mid-nineteenth-century debates about ethnology, craniology, and archaeological chronology. New information on the relationship between Bateman and the authors of Crania Britannica, Joseph Barnard Davis and John Thurnam, is brought to light thanks to unpublished archival material from the Sheffield Museums and the Royal Anthropological Institute. Crania Britannica was the first publication of British national skull types from prehistory to the Anglo-Saxon period. The publication employed the techniques of craniology—the systematic study of head types—as a chronological tool. Indeed, craniology is often seen as the mechanism by which the Three Age System was initially received in Britain and Ireland. Here, Bateman's involvement in the publication and his own theories on the development of the past with regard to cranial sequencing and archaeological chronology are explored in greater detail.

L'ampleur de l'influence de l'antiquaire Thomas Bateman, natif du Derbyshire, sur les débats du dix-neuvième siècle en ethnologie, craniologie et chronologie archéologique forme le sujet de cet article. Un examen des archives inédites conservées dans les musées de Sheffield et du Royal Anthropological Institute nous éclaire sur les des rapports entre Bateman et les auteurs de Crania Britannica, Joseph Barnard Davis et John Thurnam. Crania Britannica fut le premier ouvrage sur les types de crânes provenant de l'ensemble des Iles britanniques de la préhistoire à l’époque anglo-saxonne à avoir utilisé les techniques de la craniologie (l'analyse systématique des formes de crânes) à des fins chronologiques. En effet on pense que la craniologie a été un des mécanismes à travers lesquels le concept des trois âges fut introduit en Grande Bretagne et en Irlande. Le rôle que Bateman a joué dans la publication de cet ouvrage et ses propres théories sur l’évolution des crânes et leur position en chronologie archéologique sont exposés en détail dans cet article. Translation by Madeleine Hummler

Die Bedeutung des Derbyshire Altertumsforschers Thomas Bateman in den Diskussionen der Mitte des neunzehnten Jahrhunderts innerhalb der Ethnologie, der Kraniologie und der archäologischen Chronologie wird in diesem Artikel geschildert. Die Beziehungen zwischen Bateman und die Autoren von Crania Britannica, Joseph Barnard Davis und John Thurnam, werden hier anhand von Archivmaterial in den Museen von Sheffield und im Royal Anthropological Institute untersucht. Crania Britannica war die erste Veröffentlichung von urgeschichtlichen bis angelsächsischen Schädeltypen aus ganz Großbritannien. Sie verwendete kraniologische Techniken (die systematische Untersuchung von Schädeln) um eine chronologische Reihenfolge aufzustellen. Man nimmt oft an, dass die Kraniologie zur ursprünglichen Annahme des Drei-Alter-Systems in Großbritannien und Irland beigetragen hat. Die Beteiligung von Bateman an der Veröffentlichung von Crania Britannica und seine eigenen Theorien über die Entwicklung der Vergangenheit hinsichtlich der zeitlichen Abfolge der Schädel und der archäologischen Chronologie werden hier eingehend untersucht. Translation by Madeleine Hummler

Keywords

Crania BritannicaThomas BatemanJoseph Barnard DavisJohn ThurnamethnologycraniologyThree Age SystemCeltsCrania BritannicaThomas BatemanJoseph Barnard DavisJohn Thurnamethnologiecraniologiethéorie des trois âgesCeltesCrania BritannicaThomas BatemanJoseph Barnard DavisJohn ThurnamEthnologieKraniologieDrei-Alter-SystemKelten
Type
Articles
Information
European Journal of Archaeology , Volume 21 , Issue 1 , February 2018 , pp. 57 - 77
Copyright
Copyright © European Association of Archaeologists 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Unpublished Sources

Sheffield Museums and Galleries Trust, Bateman Archive

Account Book 1851–1860. Articles added to the Museum & Library of Thomas Bateman of Lomberdale near Yolgrave Derbyshire from the 1st of January 1851.Google Scholar
Antiquarian Correspondence, volumes I–V, 1844 to 1859, collated by author.Google Scholar
MS Derbyshire Tumuli, 1843. Bateman, Thomas, Description of Tumuli or Barrows in Derbyshire opened by Thomas Bateman, Junior of Bakewell in the Summer of 1843.Google Scholar
MS Ten Years Digging, 1861. Bateman, Thomas, Ten Years Digging Begun 1848, Descriptions of and Observations on Further Discoveries in the Barrows of Derbyshire.Google Scholar
MS Vestiges, 1848. Bateman, Thomas, Vestiges of the Antiquaries of Derbyshire.Google Scholar

Royal Anthropological Institute (RAI)

RAI, MS 140/2. Joseph Barnard Davis, notebook 1845–1859.Google Scholar
RAI, MS 150/2. Joseph Barnard Davis, subscribers’ names Crania Britannica n.d.Google Scholar
RAI, MS 436/10–11. Joseph Barnard Davis ‘collection’. Printed pamphlets: Hints for collecting and preserving the bones of ancient skulls (1853).Google Scholar
RAI, MS 436/12. Joseph Barnard Davis ‘collection’. Prospectus for Crania Celtica (1852).Google Scholar
RAI, MS 436/13–23. Joseph Barnard Davis ‘collection’. Copies of the prospectus for Crania Britannica (1852–56).Google Scholar

References

Bateman, T. 1847. Ornaments of Kimmeridge Coal, and on some Ornaments of Jewellery Presumed of the Romano-British Period, Found in Tumuli in Derbyshire. Journal of the British Archaeological Association, 2: 234–38.Google Scholar
Bateman, T. 1848. Vestiges of Antiquities of Derbyshire. London: J.R. Smith.Google Scholar
Bateman, T. 1851. Remarks on the Opening of Ancient Barrows. Derby Mercury, 27 August, pp. 1–2.Google Scholar
Bateman, T. 1852. Remarks Upon a Few of the Barrows Opened at Various Times in the More Hilly Districts near Bakewell. Journal of the British Archaeological Association, 7: 210–20.Google Scholar
Bateman, T. 1855a. A Descriptive Catalogue of Antiquities and Miscellaneous Objects. Bakewell: James Gratton.Google Scholar
Bateman, T. 1855b. On the Sepulchral Antiquities of Various Ancient Nations, Illustrative of the Custom of Tumular Interment, as Practiced by the Primitive Inhabitants of Britain. Reliquiae Antiquiae Eboracenses, 1: 1–9.Google Scholar
Bateman, T. 1856. Notices of Archaeological Publication: Crania Britannica. The Archaeological Journal, 13: 421–24.Google Scholar
Bateman, T. 1861a. Ten Years Digging in Celtic and Saxon Grave Hills. London: J.R. Smith.Google Scholar
Bateman, T. 1861b. On the Extinct Animals of Derbyshire, in their Relation to Man. The Reliquary, A Depository of Precious Relics, 1: 225–29.Google Scholar
Beddoe, J. 1885. The Races of Britain; A Contribution to the Anthropology of Western Europe. Bristol: J.W. Arrowsmith.Google Scholar
Briggs, C.S. 2009a. Some Reflections on the Archaeological Institute's Oxford Congress in 1850. The Antiquaries Journal, 166: 210–36.Google Scholar
Briggs, C.S. 2009b. From Antiquarianism to Archaeology in The Times 1785–1900: Some Observations. In: Sebire, H., ed. Pursuits and Joys: Great Victorian Antiquarians and Intellects: The Lukis Family of Guernsey and their Contemporaries. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing, pp. 73–93.Google Scholar
Busk, G. 1861. Observations on a Systematic Mode of Craniometry. Transactions of the Ethnological Society of London, 1: 341–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Combe, G. 1839. Phrenological Remarks on the Relation between the Natural Talents and Dispositions of Nations and the Developments of their Brains. In: Morton, S., ed. Crania Americana: or a Comparative View of the Skulls of Various Aboriginal Nations. Philadelphia: J. Dobson, pp. 269–91.Google Scholar
Cuvier, G. 1825. Discours sur les révolutions de la surface du globe et sur les changements qu'elles ont produits dans le règne animal (3rd ed). Paris: G. Dufour & E. d'Ocagne.Google Scholar
Davis, J.B. 1853. Hints for Collecting and Preserving the Bones of Ancient Skulls. Gentleman's Magazine, October: 386.Google Scholar
Davis, J.B. 1855. On the Forms of the Crania of the Ancient Britons. Report of the British Association for the Advancement of Science (Liverpool), 24: 127–28.Google Scholar
Davis, J.B. 1857. On the Crania of the Ancient Britons, with Remarks on the People Themselves. Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia, 1857: 40–48.Google Scholar
Davis, J.B. 1867. Thesaurus Craniorum. Catalogue of the Skulls of the Various Races of Man, in the Collection of Joseph Barnard Davis, MD, FSA. London: Printed for the Subscribers.Google Scholar
Davis, J.B. & Thurnam, J. 1856–1865. Crania Britannica. Delineations and Descriptions of Skulls of the Aboriginal and Early Inhabitants of the British Islands: With Notices of their Other Remains. London: Printed by Taylor & Francis for the Subscribers.Google Scholar
Derby Mercury 1851. British Archaeological Association. Derby Mercury, 27 August, p. 1.Google Scholar
Díaz-Andreu, M. 2007. A World History of Nineteenth-Century Archaeology: Nationalism, Colonialism, and the Past. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dietler, M. 1994. ‘Our Ancestors the Gauls’: Archaeology, Ethnic Nationalism, and the Manipulation of Celtic Identity in Modern Europe. American Anthropologist, 96: 584–605.Google Scholar
Gräslund, B. 1987. The Birth of Prehistoric Chronology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hervey, N. 2007. Davis, Joseph Barnard (1801–1881). Oxford Dictionary of National Biography [online] [accessed 20 March 2011]. Available at: http://www.oxforddnb.com/view/article/7289.Google Scholar
Hoyme, L.E. 1953. Physical Anthropology and its Instruments: An Historical Study. Southwestern Journal of Anthropology, 9: 408–30.Google Scholar
Hunt, E.E. 1981. The Old Physical Anthropology. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 56: 339–46.Google Scholar
Hunt, J. 1864. On Anthropological Classification. Report of the British Association for the Advancement of Science (Newcastle-upon-Tyne), 33: 139–40.Google Scholar
Isaacson, S. 1850. Barrow-Digging by a Barrow-Knight in Six Fyffes, with Notes by an Esquire. London: John Oliver.Google Scholar
J.B. 1868. Davis and Thurnam's Crania Britannica. Anthropological Review, 6: 52–55.Google Scholar
JBAA 1852. Proceedings of the Congress. Journal of the British Archaeological Association, 7: 309–66.Google Scholar
Jorion, P. 1982. The Downfall of the Skull. Royal Anthropological Institute Newsletter, 48: 8–11.Google Scholar
Kuper, A. 2005. The Reinvention of Primitive Society: Transformations of a Myth. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levine, P. 1986. The Amateur and the Professional: Antiquarians, Historians, and Archaeologists in Victorian England 1838–1886. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lubbock, J. 1865a. On Mr. Bateman's Researches in Ancient British Tumuli. Transactions of the Ethnological Society of London, 3: 307–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lubbock, J. 1865b. Pre-Historic Times, as Illustrated by Ancient Remains, and the Manners and Customs of Modern Savages. London: Williams & Norgate.Google Scholar
Lyell, C. 1853. Principles of Geology, Being an Attempt to Explain the Former Changes of the Earth's Surface, by Reference to Causes now in Operation, Volume 1 (9th ed). London: John Murray.Google Scholar
Marsden, B. 1979. The Barrow Knight: A Study of the Life and Work of Thomas Bateman (1821–61), Derbyshire Antiquarian and Collector (unpublished MPhil dissertation, University of Sheffield).Google Scholar
Meigs, J.A. 1858. Hints to Craniographers. Proceedings of the National Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia, 10: 1–6.Google Scholar
Montagu, A. 1962. The Concept of Race. American Anthropologist, 64: 919–28.Google Scholar
Morse, M.A. 1999. Craniology and the Adoption of the Three-Age System in Britain. Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society, 65: 1–16.Google Scholar
Morse, M.A. 2005. How the Celts Came to Britain. Stroud: Tempus.Google Scholar
Morton, S.G. 1839. Crania Americana, or a Comparative View of the Skulls of Various Aboriginal Nations. Philadelphia: J. Dobson.Google Scholar
Morton, S.G. 1844. Crania Aegyptiaca or Observations on Egyptian Ethnography, Derived from Anatomy, History and the Monuments. Philadelphia: American Philosophical Society.Google Scholar
Nott, J.C. & Gliddon, G.R. 1857. Types of Mankind, or, Ethnological Researches: Based upon the Ancient Monuments, Paintings, Sculptures, and Crania of Races, and upon their Natural, Geographical, Philological, and Biblical History (8th ed). Philadelphia: J.B. Lippincott.Google Scholar
Prichard, J.C. 1841–1847. Researches into the Physical History of Mankind, 5 volumes (3rd ed). London: Sherwood, Gilbert & Piper.Google Scholar
Rainger, R. 1978. Race, Politics, and Science: The Anthropological Society of London in the 1860s. Victorian Studies, 22: 51–70.Google Scholar
Rowley-Conwy, P. 2007. From Genesis to Prehistory: The Archaeological Three-Age System and its Contested Reception in Denmark, Britain, and Ireland. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Rowley-Conwy, P. 2013. The Gristhorpe Burial in 19th-century Archaeology: An Essay on the Development of Archaeological Thought. In: Melton, N.D. et al. , eds. Gristhorpe Man: A Life and Death in the Bronze Age. Oxford: David Brown, pp. 13–28.Google Scholar
Sale Catalogue 1893. Sotheby, Wilkinson & Hodge, The Bateman Heirlooms. Catalogue of the Valuable Library of Printed Books & Manuscripts. London: Sotheby, Wilkinson & Hodge.Google Scholar
Stewart, T.D. 1936. Anthropometric Nomenclature: I. The Cephalic (Length-Breadth) Index. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 22: 97–140.Google Scholar
Stocking, G.W. 1963. Matthew Arnold, E.B. Tylor, and the Uses of Invention. American Anthropologist, 65: 783–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stocking, G.W. 1971. What's in a Name? The Origins of the Royal Anthropological Institute (1837–71). Man, 6: 369–90.Google Scholar
Stocking, G.W. 1987. Victorian Anthropology. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
Stocking, G.W. 1994. The Turn-of-the-Century Concept of Race. Modernism/Modernity, 1: 4–16.Google Scholar
Thurnam, J. 1849. Description of an Ancient Tumular Cemetery, at Lamel-Hill, near York. Proceedings of the Yorkshire Philosophical Society, 1: 98–105.Google Scholar
Thurnam, J. 1850. Observations on Danish Tumuli, and on the Importance of Collecting Crania found in Tumuli. The Archaeological Journal, 7: 34–35.Google Scholar
Thurnam, J. 1865. On the Two Principal Forms of Ancient British and Gaulish Skulls. Memoirs Read before the Anthropological Society of London, 1: 120–68, 459–519.Google Scholar
Trigger, B. 2006. A History of Archaeological Thought (2nd ed). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Urquhart, A.R. 2007. Thurnam, John (1810–1873). Oxford Dictionary of National Biography [online] [accessed 20 March 2011]. Available at: http://www.oxforddnb.com/view/article/27410.Google Scholar
van Wyhe, J. 2004. Phrenology and the Origins of Victorian Scientific Naturalism. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Wilson, D. 1851. The Archaeology and Prehistoric Annals of Scotland. Edinburgh: Sutherland & Knox.Google Scholar
Worsaae, J.J.A. 1847. Zur Altertumskunde des Nordens. Leipzig: Leopold Voss.Google Scholar
Wright, T. 1845. The Archaeological Album; or, Museum of National Antiquities. London: Chapman & Hall.Google Scholar