Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T00:29:26.851Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Staša Babić. Metaarheologija. Ogled o uslovima znanja o prošlosti (Metaarchaeology: An Essay on the Conditions of Knowledge about the Past) (Belgrade: Clio, 2018, 188pp., ISBN 978-86-7102-596-6)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 April 2019

Uroš Matić
Uroš Matić*
Affiliation:
Institut für Ägyptologie und Koptologie, Westfälische Wilhelms-Universität Münster, Germany
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Book Review
Information
European Journal of Archaeology , Volume 22 , Issue 2 , May 2019 , pp. 289 - 293
Copyright
Copyright © European Association of Archaeologists 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bourdieu, P. 1988. Homo Academicus. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Candelora, D. 2018. Entangled in Orientalism: How the Hyksos Became a Race. Journal of Egyptian History, 11: 45–72. doi: https://doi.org/10.1163/18741665-12340042Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. & Foucault, M. 2006. The Chomsky-Foucault Debate on Human Nature. New York & London: The New Press.Google Scholar
Eco, U. 2000. Kant and the Platypus: Essays on Language and Cognition. New York: Harcourt Brace.Google Scholar
Fahlander, F. 2009–2018. The Homepage of Social Microarchaeology [accessed 8 December 2018]. Available at: http://www.mikroarkeologi.se/Google Scholar
Fleck, L. 1979 [1935]. Genesis and Development of a Scientific Fact. Chicago & London: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Harris, O.J.T. & Cipolla, C. 2017. Archaeological Theory in the New Millennium: Introducing Current Perspectives. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
Latour, B. & Woolgar, S. 1979. Laboratory Life: The Construction of Scientific Facts. Los Angeles & London: SAGE Publications.Google Scholar
Naujoks, A.-S. & Stelling, J. 2018. Einleitung. In: Naujoks, A.-S., Stelling, J. & Scholz, O.R., eds., Von der Quelle zur Theorie. Über das Verhältnis zwischen Objektivität und Subjektivität in den historischen Wissenschaften. Leiden & Boston: Mentis Verlag, pp. 9–26.Google Scholar
Schuenemann, V.J., Peltzer, A., Welte, B., van Pelt, W.P., Molak, M., Wang, C.-C. et al. , 2017. Ancient Egyptian Mummy Genomes Suggest an Increase of Sub-Saharan African Ancestry in Post-Roman Periods. Nature Communications, 8: 15694.Google Scholar
Stabrey, U. 2017. Archäologische Untersuchungen: Über Temporalität und Dinge. Historie 98. Bielefeld: [transcript].Google Scholar