Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T14:11:00.089Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Proof of Life: Mark-Making Practices on the Island of Alderney

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 December 2018

Caroline Sturdy Colls Open the ORCID record for Caroline Sturdy Colls [Opens in a new window] ,
Rachel Bolton-King Open the ORCID record for Rachel Bolton-King [Opens in a new window] ,
Kevin Colls Open the ORCID record for Kevin Colls [Opens in a new window] ,
Tim Harris  and
Czelsie Weston
Caroline Sturdy Colls
Affiliation:
Centre of Archaeology, Staffordshire University, UK
Rachel Bolton-King
Affiliation:
Law, Policing and Forensics, Staffordshire University, UK
Kevin Colls
Affiliation:
Centre of Archaeology, Staffordshire University, UK
Tim Harris
Affiliation:
Geography, Staffordshire University, UK
Czelsie Weston
Affiliation:
Centre of Archaeology, Staffordshire University, UK
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Currently, mark-making practices as a form of identification and proof of life are an unrealized resource. Over a three-year period, systematic walkover surveys were conducted on and within fortifications and other structures on the island of Alderney to locate historic and modern marks. The investigations presented in this article demonstrate the importance of non-invasive recording and examination of marks to identify evidence connected to forced and slave labourers, and soldiers present on the island of Alderney during the German occupation in World War II. Names, hand and footwear impressions, slogans, artworks, dates, and counting mechanisms were recorded electronically and investigated by using international databases, archives, and translation services. We discuss the value and challenges of interpreting traces of human life in the contexts of conflict archaeology and missing person investigations and underline the need for greater recognition of marks as evidence of past lives.

L’étude des marques comme forme d'identification et de preuve de vie est un domaine actuellement peu exploré. Une enquête systématique, dont le but était de repérer des signes d’époques historiques et modernes, a été menée sur une durée de trois ans autour et à l'intérieur des fortifications et autres structures de l’île d'Alderney. L’étude présentée ici démontre l'importance des relevés de surface et de l'examen des marques laissées par les prisonniers, forçats et soldats présents sur l’île d'Alderney au cours de son occupation pendant la Seconde Guerre Mondiale. Les recherches ont révélé des noms, des empreintes de mains et de chaussures, des slogans, des œuvres d'art, des dates et des systèmes de comptage qui ont été enregistrés, numérisés et étudiés à l'aide de bases de données internationales, d'archives et de services de traduction. Notre discussion porte sur la valeur et les défis posés par l'interprétation de traces de vie humaine dans le contexte de l'archéologie des conflits et des enquêtes sur personnes disparues et souligne le besoin de prendre davantage en compte le marquage en tant que preuve de vie. Translation by Madeleine Hummler

Heute stellen Markierungen als Ausdruck der Identität und als Nachweis eines Lebens eine nicht ausgebeutete Quelle dar. In den letzten drei Jahren wurde eine systematische Aufnahme von verschiedenen Zeichen auf und innerhalb der Festungen und anderen Anlagen auf der Insel Alderney durchgeführt. Das Ziel war, Markierungen aus historischer und moderner Zeit zu dokumentieren. Die in diesem Artikel vorgestellten Untersuchungen unterstreichen die Bedeutung von nichtinvasiven Aufnahmeverfahren und der Auswertung von Kennzeichen, die es ermöglichen, die Anwesenheit von Zwangsarbeiter, Häftlingen und Soldaten auf der Insel Alderney während des Zweiten Weltkrieges zu beweisen. Namen, Abdrücke von Händen und Schuhen, Leitsprüche, Kunstwerke, Daten und Zählsysteme wurden elektronisch erfasst und mit Hilfe von internationalen Datenbanken, Archiven und Übersetzungsdiensten ausgewertet. Im Vordergrund der Ausführungen stehen der Betrag und die Schwierigkeiten hinsichtlich der Interpretation von Spuren menschlichen Lebens im Rahmen der Konfliktarchäologie und der Suche nach vermissten Personen. Diese Diskussion unterstreicht die Notwendigkeit einer besseren Anerkennung von Markierungen als Lebensbeweise in der Vergangenheit. Translation by Madeleine Hummler

Keywords

conflict archaeologyforced labourmark-makingWorld War IIidentificationarchéologie des conflitstravail forcémarquageSeconde Guerre MondialeidentificationKonfliktarchäologieZwangsarbeitMarkierungenZweiter WeltkriegIdentifizierung
Type
Article
Information
European Journal of Archaeology , Volume 22 , Issue 2 , May 2019 , pp. 232 - 254
Copyright
Copyright © European Association of Archaeologists 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Agutter, R. 2014. Marking Time: Graffiti at the Adelaide Gaol. Adelaide: Flinders University of South Australia, Department of Archaeology.Google Scholar
Åström, P. 2007. The Study of Ancient Fingerprints. Journal of Ancient Fingerprints, 1: 2–3.Google Scholar
Aubert, M., Brumm, A., Ramli, M., Sutikna, T., Saptomo, E.W., Hakim, B. et al. 2014. Pleistocene Cave Art from Sulawesi, Indonesia. Nature, 514 (7521): 223–27.Google Scholar
Baird, J.A. & Taylor, C. eds. 2011. Ancient Graffiti in Context. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Bashford, A., Hobbins, P., Clarke, A. & Frederick, U.K. 2016. Geographies of Commemoration: Angel Island, San Francisco and North Head, Sydney. Journal of Historical Geography, 52: 16–25.Google Scholar
Bennett, M.R. & Morse, S.A. 2014. Human Footprints: Fossilised Locomotion. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Bonnard, B. 2013. The Island of Dread in the Channel: The Story of Georgi Ivanovitch Kondakov. Stroud: Amberley.Google Scholar
Brown, M. 2017. Karen Nichols’ Blog: WW1 Trenches Beneath Wiltshire Reveals an Australian Hero [online] [accessed 6 November 2017]. Available at <https://www.wessexarch.co.uk/news/ww1-trenches-beneath-wiltshire-reveals-australian-hero>>Google Scholar
Bunting, M. 1995. The Model Occupation; The Channel Islands under German Rule 1940–45. London: HarperCollins.Google Scholar
Burton, J.F. & Farrell, M.M. 2012. ‘Life in Manzanar Where There is a Spring Breeze’: Graffiti at a World War II Japanese American Internment Camp. In: Mytum, H. & Carr, G., eds. Prisoners of War (Contributions to Global Historical Archaeology, 1). New York: Springer, pp. 239–69.Google Scholar
Carr, G. 2010. Shining a Light on Dark Tourism: German Bunkers in the British Channel Islands. Public Archaeology, 9: 64–84.Google Scholar
Carr, G. & Sturdy Colls, C. 2016. Taboo and Sensitive Heritage: Labour Camps, Burials and the Role of Activism in the Channel Islands. International Journal of Heritage Studies, 22: 702–15.Google Scholar
Casella, E.C. 2009. Written on the Walls: Inmate Graffiti within Places of Confinement. In: Beisaw, A.M. & Gibb, J.G., eds. The Archaeology of Institutional Life. Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press, pp. 172–86.Google Scholar
Casella, E.C. 2014. Enmeshed Inscriptions: Reading the Graffiti of Australia's Convict Past. Australian Archaeology, 78: 108–12.Google Scholar
Chartered Institute for Archaeologists 2014a. Standard and Guidance for Archaeological Field Evaluation. Reading: Chartered Institute for Archaeologists.Google Scholar
Chartered Institute for Archaeologists 2014b. Standard and Guidance for Desk-Based Assessment. Reading: Chartered Institute for Archaeologists.Google Scholar
Cocroft, W., Devlin, D., Schofield, J. & Thomas, R.J.C. 2006. War Art: Murals and Graffiti – Military Life, Power and Subversion. York: Council for British Archaeology.Google Scholar
Cruikshank, C. 1975. The German Occupation of the Channel Islands. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Czarnecki, J.P. 1989. Last Traces: The Lost Art of Auschwitz. New York: Atheneum.Google Scholar
Daniell, C. 2011. Graffiti, Calliglyphs and Markers in the UK. Archaeologies: Journal of the World Archaeological Congress, 7: 454–76.Google Scholar
Davenport, T. 2003. Festung Alderney: The German Defences of Alderney. Jersey: Barnes Publishing Society.Google Scholar
Davenport, T. 2009. Alderney's Victorian Forts and Harbour. Alderney: Alderney Society and Museum.Google Scholar
Driscoll, P. 2010. The Past in the Prehistoric Channel Islands. Shima: The International Journal of Research into Island Cultures, 4: 65–81.Google Scholar
Drollinger, H., Falvey, L.W. & Beck, C. 2015. Protest Graffiti at the Historic Nevada Peace Camp. Paper presented at the 80th Annual Meeting of the Society for American Archaeology, San Francisco, CA, 15–19 April.Google Scholar
EDINA 2014. Fieldtrip GB download [online] [accessed 1 February 2017]. Available at <https://web.archive.org/web/20170201084307/http://fieldtripgb.blogs.edina.ac.uk/>>Google Scholar
Edwards, H.G.M., Drummond, L. & Russ, J. 1998. Fourier-Transform Raman Spectroscopic Study of Pigments in Native American Indian Rock Art: Seminole Canyon. Spectrochimica Acta Part A: Molecular and Biomolecular Spectroscopy, 54: 1849–56.Google Scholar
Forty, G. 1999. The Channel Islands at War: A German Perspective. Sheperton: Ian Allan Publishing.Google Scholar
Frederick, U.K. 2009. Revolution is the New Black: Graffiti/Art and Mark-Making Practices. Archaeologies, 5: 210–37.Google Scholar
Frederick, U.K & Clarke, A. 2014. Signs of the Times: Archaeological Approaches to Historical and Contemporary Graffiti. Australian Archaeology, 78: 54–57.Google Scholar
Freeman-Keel, T. 1995. From Auschwitz to Alderney and Beyond. Malvern Wells: Images Publishing.Google Scholar
Giles, K. & Giles, M. 2010. Signs of the Times: Nineteenth–Twentieth Century Graffiti in the Farms of the Yorkshire Wolds. In: Oliver, J. & Neal, T., eds. Wild Signs: Graffiti in Archaeology and History (BAR International Series 2074). Oxford: Archaeopress, pp. 47–59.Google Scholar
Gillings, M. 2009. Visual Affordance, Landscape and the Megaliths of Alderney. Oxford Journal of Archaeology, 28: 335–56.Google Scholar
Hobbins, P., Frederick, U. & Clarke, A. 2016. Stories from the Sandstone: Quarantine Inscriptions from Australia's Immigrant Past. Sydney: Arbon Publishing.Google Scholar
Holmes, L. 2016 Missing Someone: Exploring the Experiences of Family Members. In: Morewitz, S. & Sturdy Colls, C., eds. Handbook of Missing Persons. New York: Springer, pp. 551–74.Google Scholar
Huiskes, M. 1983. Die Wandinschriften des Kölner Gestapogefängnisses im EL-DE-Haus 1943–1945. Köln & Wien: Böhlau.Google Scholar
IBM n.d. Locale Quick Reference [online] [accessed 29 January 2018]. Available at <https://www.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/SSS28S_8.1.0/XFDL/i_xfdl_r_locale_quick_reference.html>>Google Scholar
Ismail, S. 2011. The Syrian Uprising: Imagining and Performing the Nation. Studies in Ethnicity and Nationalism, 11: 538–49.Google Scholar
Jung, W. 2013. Wände, die Sprechen [Walls that Talk]: Die Wandinschriften im Kölner Gestapogefängnisses im EL-DE-Haus [The Wall Inscriptions in the Cologne Gestapo Prison in the EL-DE House]. Köln: Emons.Google Scholar
Kendrick, T.D. 1928. The Archaeology of the Channel Islands. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
Králík, M. & Nejman, L. 2007. Fingerprints on Artefact and Historical Items: Examples and Comments. Journal of Ancient Fingerprints, 1: 4–15.Google Scholar
Lennon, J.F. 2016. Trains, Railroad Workers and Illegal Riders: The Sub-Cultural World of Hobo Graffiti. In: Ross, J.I., ed. The Routledge Handbook of Graffiti and Street Art. Abingdon: Routledge, pp. 27–35.Google Scholar
Mackie, M.E. 2015. Estimating Age and Sex: Paleodemographic Identification Using Rock Art Hand Sprays, an Application in Johnson County, Wyoming. Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports, 3: 333–41.Google Scholar
McAtackney, L. 2011. Peace Maintenance and Political Messages: The Significance of Walls During and After the Northern Irish ‘Troubles’. Journal of Social Archaeology, 11: 77–98.Google Scholar
McAtackney, L. 2014. An Archaeology of the Troubles: The Dark Heritage of Long Kesh/Maze Prison. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
McAtackney, L. 2016. Graffiti Revelations and the Changing Meanings of Kilmainham Gaol in (Post) Colonial Ireland. International Journal of Historical Archaeology, 20: 492–505.Google Scholar
Merrill, S. & Hack, H. 2013. Exploring Hidden Narratives: Conscript Graffiti at the Former Military Base of Kummersdorf. Journal of Social Archaeology, 13: 101–21.Google Scholar
Migeod, F.W.H. 1934. Report on Excavations at Longy Bay, Alderney, 1934. Report and Transactions, 12: 134.Google Scholar
Monaghan, J. 2011. Alderney: A New Roman Fort? Current Archaeology, 261: 28–33.Google Scholar
Myers, A.T. 2008. Between Memory and Materiality: An Archaeological Approach to Studying the Nazi Concentration Camps. Journal of Conflict Archaeology, 4: 231–45.Google Scholar
Nelson, E., Hall, J., Randolph-Quinney, P. & Sinclair, A. 2017. Beyond Size: The Potential of a Geometric Morphometric Analysis of Shape and Form for the Assessment of Sex in Hand Stencils in Rock Art. Journal of Archaeological Science, 78: 202–13.Google Scholar
Packe, M.J. & Dreyfus, M. 1990. The Alderney Story. Alderney: Alderney Society and Museum.Google Scholar
Palmer, D. 1997. In the Anonymity of a Murmur: Graffiti and the Construction of the Past at the Fremantle Prison. Studies in Western Australian History, 17: 104–15.Google Scholar
Pantcheff, T.X.H. 1981. Alderney Fortress Island. Sussex: The History Press.Google Scholar
Roberts, M.R. 2010. ‘Footprints in the Concrete’: A Study of the Chemin des Juifs (Jews' Road), Jewish Slave Labour Camps, and Related Sites, in the Nord-Pas-de-Calais, France. The Historic Environment: Policy & Practice, 1: 70–102.Google Scholar
Sanders, P. 2005. The British Channel Islands under German Occupation 1940–45. Jersey: Jersey Heritage Trust.Google Scholar
Steckoll, S. 1982. The Alderney Death Camp. London: Mayflower.Google Scholar
Stephenson, C. 2013. The Channel Islands 1941–45: Hitler's Impregnable Fortress. London: Osprey.Google Scholar
Sturdy Colls, C. 2012. Holocaust Archaeology: Archaeological Approaches to Landscapes of Nazi Genocide and Persecution (unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Birmingham, UK).Google Scholar
Sturdy Colls, C. 2015. Holocaust Archaeologies: Approaches and Future Directions. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Sturdy Colls, C. 2016. The Investigation of Historic Missing Persons Cases: Genocide and ‘Conflict Time’ Human Rights Abuses. In: Morewitz, S. & Colls, C. Sturdy, eds. Handbook of Missing Persons. New York: Springer, pp. 551–74.Google Scholar
Sturdy Colls, C. 2017. The Archaeology of Cultural Genocide: A Forensic Turn in Holocaust Studies? In: Dziuban, Z., ed. Mapping the ‘Forensic Turn’: The Engagements with Materialities of Mass Death in Holocaust Studies and Beyond. Vienna: New Academic Press, pp. 119–41.Google Scholar
Sturdy Colls, C. & Colls, K. 2014. Reconstructing a Painful Past: A Non-Invasive Approach to Reconstructing Lager Norderney in Alderney, the Channel Islands. In: Ch'ng, E., Gaffney, V. & Chapman, H., eds. Visual Heritage in the Digital Age. New York: Springer, pp. 119–46.Google Scholar
Sturdy Colls, C. & Colls, K. forthcoming. Adolf Island: The History and Archaeology of the Occupation of Alderney. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Taş, H. 2017. Street Arts of Resistance in Tahrir and Gezi. Middle Eastern Studies, 53: 802–19.Google Scholar