Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T12:37:04.209Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Cultural Continuity and Social Resistance: The Chronology of Megalithic Funerary Practices in Southern Iberia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 July 2017

Gonzalo Aranda Jiménez ,
Águeda Lozano Medina ,
Marta Díaz-Zorita Bonilla ,
Margarita Sánchez Romero  and
Javier Escudero Carrillo
Gonzalo Aranda Jiménez
Affiliation:
Department of Prehistory and Archaeology, University of Granada, Spain
Águeda Lozano Medina
Affiliation:
Department of Prehistory and Archaeology, University of Granada, Spain
Marta Díaz-Zorita Bonilla
Affiliation:
Institut für Ur- und Frühgeschichte und Archäologie des Mittelalters, University of Tübingen, Germany
Margarita Sánchez Romero
Affiliation:
Department of Prehistory and Archaeology, University of Granada, Spain
Javier Escudero Carrillo
Affiliation:
Institut für Ur- und Frühgeschichte und Archäologie des Mittelalters, University of Tübingen, Germany
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Inspired by the biographical approach to the study of material culture, a radiocarbon dating programme was undertaken to explore the chronology and temporality of the megalithic monuments in south-eastern Iberia. Instead of one or two dates per tomb, the normal way of approaching this complex issue, we carried out a complete radiocarbon dating series of single tombs based on human remains. We focused our attention on four tholos-type tombs in the cemetery of El Barranquete (Almería, Spain). According to the new radiocarbon series modelled in a Bayesian framework, four main conclusions can be drawn: that the cemetery shows a very long period of funerary activity, which began in the late fourth millennium and ended in the last centuries of the second millennium cal bc; that continuity of ritual practices attained an unexpected importance during the Bronze Age; that interments, which fall into cultural periods that would be unthinkable if only the typological properties of the grave goods were considered, occurred; and that each tomb had a complex and very different biography.

Inspiré par l'approche biographique dans l'étude de la culture matérielle, un programme de datation radiocarbone a été mis en œuvre afin d'explorer la chronologie et la temporalité des monuments mégalithiques du sud-est de la Péninsule ibérique. Au lieu d'obtenir une ou deux dates par sépulture, la façon habituelle d'approcher cette problématique, des séries complètes de datations radiocarbone sur des restes humains correspondant à des sépultures individuelles ont été élaborées. Notre étude a porté sur quatre tombes de type tholos de la nécropole d'El Barranquete (Almería, Espagne). La nouvelle série de datations modelée par l'analyse Bayésienne nous a permis d'en tirer quatre conclusions principales: l'utilisation funéraire de la nécropole a duré très longtemps, au moins depuis la fin du quatrième millénaire jusqu'aux derniers siècles du deuxième millénaire cal bc; la pratique continue des rituels funéraires prit une importance particulière pendant l'âge de Bronze; des inhumations furent pratiquées au cours de périodes culturelles qui seraient restées invisibles si l'on avait seulement examiné les caractéristiques typologiques des objets funéraires; enfin, chaque tombe s'est révélée complexe, chacune avec sa propre biographie. Translation by the authors

Angeleitet durch den geographischen Ansatz des Studiums der materiellen Hinterlassenschaften, wurde ein 14C Datierungsprogramm durchgeführt, um verschiedene chronologische Aspekte der Megalithkultur im Südosten der Iberischen Halbinsel zu erfassen. Im Gegensatz zur herkömmlichen Herangehensweise, die in der Regel eine oder zwei 14C Daten pro Grab betraf, wurde in dieser Studie, auf der Basis von anthropologischen Resten, eine ganze Serie von Datierungen innerhalb einer Grabstätte unternommen. Wir konzentrierten unseren Forschungen auf vier tholos Gräber in der Nekropole von El Barranquete (Almería, Spanien). Nach den neuen 14C Daten und deren Bayesschen Modell, können wir vier wesentliche Schlussfolgerungen ziehen: die Nekropole wurde sehr lange als Begräbnisstätte genutzt, und zwar vom Ende des vierten Jahrtausends bis in die letzten Jahrhunderte des zweiten Jahrtausends cal bc; die lange Belegungsdauer und Fortführung der Bestattungsriten weisen auf eine unerwartet große Bedeutung dieser Anlagen während der Bronzezeit; die Belegungsdauer der Bestattungen wäre nicht durch reine Anwendung typologischen Einordnungen der Grabbeigaben zu erschließen gewesen; durch diese Studie erhielten wir weitreichende Kenntnisse über die komplexe und unterschiedliche Belegungsgeschichte der einzelnen Grabstätten. Translation by the authors

Keywords

radiocarbon datingBayesian modellingfunerary ritualCopper AgeBronze AgeIberian Peninsuladatation radiocarbonemodélisation Bayésiennerituel funérairemégalithismeChalcolithiqueâge du BronzePéninsule ibériqueRadiokarbondatierungBayessche ModellierungBestattungsritenKupferzeitBronzezeitIberische Halbinsel
Type
Article
Information
European Journal of Archaeology , Volume 21 , Issue 2 , May 2018 , pp. 192 - 216
Copyright
Copyright © European Association of Archaeologists 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Almagro Gorbea, M.J. 1973. El poblado y la necrópolis de El Barranquete (Almería) (Acta Arqueológica Hispánica VI). Madrid: Ministerio de Educación y Ciencia.Google Scholar
Aranda Jiménez, G. 2013. Against Uniformity Cultural Diversity: The ‘Others’ in Argaric Societies. In: Berrocal, M. Cruz, García Sanjuán, L. & Gilman, A., eds. The Prehistory of Iberia. Debating Early Social Stratification and the State. New York: Routledge, pp. 99–118.Google Scholar
Aranda Jiménez, G. 2015. Resistencia e involución social en las comunidades de la Edad del Bronce del sureste de la Península Ibérica. Trabajos de Prehistoria, 72: 126–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aranda Jiménez, G. & Lozano Medina, A. 2014. The Chronology of Megalithic Funerary Practices: A Bayesian Approach to Grave 11 at El Barranquete Necropolis (Almería, Spain). Journal of Archaeological Science, 50: 369–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aranda Jiménez, G. & Lozano Medina, A. forthcoming. La datación arqueológica de palimpsestos: el caso de las sepulturas megalíticas. In: Barceló, J.A. & Morell, B., eds. Métodos cronométricos en Arqueología e Historia. Barcelona: Editorial Dextra.Google Scholar
Aranda Jiménez, G., Montón-Subías, S. & Sánchez Romero, M. 2015. The Archaeology of Bronze Age Iberia. Argaric Societies. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Aranda Jiménez, G., Lozano Medina, A., Escudero Carrillo, J., Sánchez Romero, M., Alarcón García, E., Fernández Martín, S., Díaz-Zorita Bonilla, M. & Barba Colmenero, V. 2016. Cronología y temporalidad de los recintos de fosos prehistóricos: el caso de Marroquíes Bajos (Jaén). Trabajos de Prehistoria, 73: 231–50.Google Scholar
Arslanov, K.A. & Svezhentsev, Y.S. 1993. An Improved Method for Radiocarbon Dating Fossil Bones. Radiocarbon, 35: 387–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Balsera, V., Bernabeu Aubán, J., Costa Caramé, M.E., García Sanjuán, L. & Pardo, S. 2015. The Radiocarbon Chronology of Southern Spain's Late Prehistory (5600–1000 cal bc): A Comparative Review. Oxford Journal of Archaeology, 34: 139–56.Google Scholar
Bayliss, A. 2009. Rolling out Revolution: Using Radiocarbon Dating in Archaeology. Radiocarbon, 51: 123–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bayliss, A. 2015. Quality in Bayesian Chronological Models in Archaeology. World Archaeology, 47: 677–700.Google Scholar
Bayliss, A., Beavan, N., Bronk Ramsey, C., Delgado-Huertas, A., Díaz-Zorita Bonilla, M., Dunbar, E., Fernández Flores, A., García Sanjuán, L., Hamilton, D., Mora-González, A. & Whittle, A. 2016. La cronología radiocarbónica del tholos de Montelirio. In: Flores, A. Fernández, Sanjuán, L. García & Bonilla, M. Díaz-Zorita, eds. Monterilio. Un gran monumneto megalítico de la Edad del Cobre. Sevilla: Consejería de Cultura de la Junta de Andalucía, pp. 482–502.Google Scholar
Bayliss, A., Bronk Ramsey, C., Van der Plicht, J. & Whittle, A. 2007. Bradshaw and Bayes: Towards a Timetable for the Neolithic. Cambridge Archaeological Journal, 17: 1–28.Google Scholar
Bocherens, H., Billiou, D., Patou-Mathis, P., Bonjean, D., Otte, M. & Mariotti, A. 1997. Paleobiological Implications of the Isotopic Signatures (13C, 15N) of Fossil Mammal Collagen in Scladina Cave (Sclayn, Belgium). Quaternary Research, 48: 370–80.Google Scholar
Bonani, G., Beer, J., Hoffmann, H., Synal, H.A., Suter, M., Wölfli, W., Pfleiderer, C., Junghans, C. & Münnich, K.O. 1987. Fractionation, Precision and Accuracy in 14C and 13C Measurements. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research, 29: 87–90.Google Scholar
Bradley, R. 2002. The Past in Prehistoric Societies. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Bradley, R. & Williams, H. 1998. The Past in the Past: The Reuse of Ancient Monuments. London: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
Bronk Ramsey, C. 1995. Radiocarbon Calibration and Analysis of Stratigraphy: The OxCal Program. Radiocarbon, 37: 425–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bronk Ramsey, C. 2001. Development of the Radiocarbon Calibration Program. Radiocarbon, 43: 355–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bronk Ramsey, C. 2009. Bayesian Analysis of Radiocarbon Dates. Radiocarbon, 51: 337–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bronk Ramsey, C. 2013. Recent and Planned Developments of the Program OxCal. In: Jull, A.J.T. & Hattlé, C., eds. Proceedings of the 21st International Radiocarbon Conference (Paris, 2012). Radiocarbon, 55: 720–30.Google Scholar
Buck, C.E. Kenworthy, J. Litton, C.D. & Smith, A.F.M. 1991. Combining Archaeological and Radiocarbon Information: A Bayesian Approach to Calibration. Antiquity, 65: 808–21.Google Scholar
Buck, C.E, Cavanagh, W.G. & Litton, C.D. 1996. Bayesian Approach to Interpreting Archaeological Data. Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
Buck, C.E, Litton, C.D. & Smith, A.F.M. 1992. Calibration of Radiocarbon Results Pertaining to Related Archaeological Results. Journal of Archaeological Science, 19: 497–512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Castro Martínez, P., Lull, V. & Micó, R. 1996. Cronología de la Prehistoria Reciente de la Península Ibérica y Baleares (c. 2800–900 cal ane). (British Archaeological Reports International Series 652). Oxford: Archaeopress.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christen, J.A. & Litton, C.D. 1995. A Bayesian Approach to Wiggle-Matching. Journal of Archaeological Science, 22: 719–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christen, J.A., Clymo, R.S. & Litton, C.D. 1995. A Bayesian Approach to the Use of 14C Dates in the Estimation of the Age of Peat. Radiocarbon, 37: 431–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeNiro, M.J. & Epstein, S. 1981. Influence of Diet on the Distribution of Nitrogen Isotopes in Animals. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 45: 341–51.Google Scholar
Díaz-Guardamino, M., García-Sanjuán, L. & Wheatley, D.W. eds. 2015. The Lives of Prehistoric Monuments. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Díaz-Zorita Bonilla, M., Aranda Jiménez, G., Escudero Carrillo, J., Robles Carrasco, S., Lozano Medina, A., Sánchez Romero, M. & Alarcón García, E. 2016. Estudio bioarqueológico de la necrópolis megalítica de El Barranquete (Níjar, Almería). Menga. Revista de Prehistoria de Andalucía, 7: 71–98.Google Scholar
Fano, M.A., Cubas, M. & Wood, R. 2015. The First Farmers in Cantabrian Spain: Contribution of Numerical Chronology to Understand an Historical Process. Quaternary International, 364: 153–61.Google Scholar
García Sanjuán, L., Wheatley, D.W. & Costa Caramé, M.E. 2011. La cronología numérica del fenómeno megalítico en el Sur de España: avances y problemas. In: Sanjuán, L. García, Scarre, C. & Wheatley, D.W., eds. Exploring Time and Matter in Prehistoric Monuments: Absolute Chronology and Rare Rocks in European Megaliths. Sevilla: Junta de Andalucía, pp. 121–42.Google Scholar
Gibaja, J.F., Subirà, M.E., Terradas, X., Santos Arévalo, F.J., Agulló, L., Gómez-Martínez, I., Allièse, F. & Fernández-López De Pablo, J. 2015. The Emergence of Mesolithic Cemeteries in SW Europe: Insights from the El Collado (Oliva, Valencia, Spain) Radiocarbon Record. PLoS ONE, 10(1). doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0115505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gosden, C. & Marshall, Y. 1999. The Cultural Biography of Objects. World Archaeology, 31: 169–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hajdas, I. 2008. Radiocarbon dating and its application in Quaternary studies. Eiszeitalter und Gegenwart, 57: 2–24.Google Scholar
Holtorf, C. 1996. Towards a Chronology of Megaliths: Understanding Monumental Time and Cultural Memory. Journal of European Archaeology, 4: 119–52.Google Scholar
Jover Maestre, F.J., López Padilla, J.A. & García-Donato Layron, G. 2014. Radiocarbono y estadística bayesina: aportaciones a la cronología de la Edad del Bronce en el extremo oriental del sudeste de la Península Ibérica. Saguntum, 46: 41–69.Google Scholar
Klein, M.G., Mous, D.J.W. & Gottdang, A. 2006. A Compact 1-MV Multi-Element AMS System. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research B, 249: 764–67.Google Scholar
Klein, M.G., van Staveren, H.J., Mous, D.J.W. & Gottdang, A. 2007. Performance of the Compact HVE 1MV Multi-Element AMS System. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research B, 259: 184–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Longin, R. 1971. New Method of Collagen Extraction for Radiocarbon Dating. Nature, 230: 241–42.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lorrio Alvarado, A.J. & Montero Ruiz, I. 2004. Reutilización de sepulcros colectivos en el Sureste de la Península Ibérica: la Colección Siret. Trabajos de Prehistoria, 61: 99–116.Google Scholar
Lozano Medina, A. & Aranda Jiménez, G. 2017. La temporalidad de las sepulturas megalíticas tipo tholos del sur de la Península Ibérica. SPAL. Revista de Prehistoria y Arqueología, 26: 17–31.Google Scholar
Lull, V., Micó Pérez, R., Rihuete Herrada, C. & Risch, R. 2013. Funerary Practices and Kinship in an Early Bronze Age Society: A Bayesian Approach Applied to the Radiocarbon Dating of Argaric Double Tombs. Journal of Archaeological Science, 4: 4626–34.Google Scholar
Manning, M.P. & Reid, R.C. 1977. CHO Systems in the Presence of an Iron Catalyst. Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Process Design and Development, 16: 358–61.Google Scholar
Millard, A. 2014. Conventions for Reporting Radiocarbon Determinations. Radiocarbon, 56: 555–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peña Romo, V. 2011. Excavando huesos en los museos. El caso de la necrópolis de “Los Millares”. In: González Martín, A., Cambra-Moo, O., Rascón Pérez, J., Campo Martín, M., Robledo Acinas, M., Labajo González, E. & Sáchez Sánchez, J.A., eds. Paleopatología: ciencia multidisciplinar. Congreso Nacional de Paleopatología (Madrid, 10 de octubre de 2009). Madrid: Sociedad Española de Paleopatología, pp. 73–80.Google Scholar
Piotrowska, N. & Goslar, T. 2002. Preparation of Bone Samples in the Gliwice Radiocarbon Laboratory for AMS Radiocarbon Dating. Isotopes in Environmental and Health Studies, 38: 267–75.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Reimer, P.J., Bard, E., Bayliss, A., Beck, J.W., Blackwell, P.G., Bronk Ramsey, C., Grootes, P.M., Guilderson, T.P., Haflidason, H., Hajdas, I., Hatt, Z.C.Heaton, T.J., Hoffmann, D.L., Hogg, A. G., Hughen, K.A., Kaiser, K.F., Kromer, B., Manning, S.W., Niu, M., Reimer, R.W., Richards, D.A., Scott, E.M., Southon, J.R., Staff, R.A., Turney, C.S.M. & van der Plicht, J. 2013. IntCal13 and Marine 13 radiocarbon age calibration curves 0–50,000 years cal bp. Radiocarbon, 55: 1869–87.Google Scholar
Robles Henriques, F.J., Monge Soares, A.M., Alves António, T.F., Curate, F., Valério, P. & Peleja Rosa, S. 2013. O Tholos Centirã 2 (Brinches, Serpa) – construtores e utilizadores; práticas funerárias e cronologias. In: Ávila, J. Jiménez, Bustamante, M. & Cabezas, M. García, eds. VI Encuentro de arqueología del suroeste peninsular. Mérida: Ayuntamiento de Villafranca de los Barros (Badajoz), pp. 319–55.Google Scholar
Santos Arévalo, F.J., Gómez Martínez, I. & García León, M. 2009. Radiocarbon Measurement Program at the Centro Nacional de Aceleradores (CNA), Spain. Radiocarbon, 51: 883–89.Google Scholar
Scarre, C. 2010. Rocks of Ages: Tempo and Time in Megalithic Monuments. European Journal of Archaeology, 13: 175–93.Google Scholar
Stuiver, M. & Polach, H.A. 1977. Reporting of 14C Data. Radiocarbon, 19: 355–63.Google Scholar
Stuiver, M. & Reimer, P.J. 1993. Extended 14C Data Base and Revised CALIB 3.0 14C Age Calibration Program. Radiocarbon, 35: 215–30.Google Scholar
Synal, H.A., Stocker, M. & Suter, M. 2007. MICADAS: A New Compact Radiocarbon AMS System. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research. Section B: Beam Interactions with Materials and Atoms, Accelerator Mass Spectrometry, 259: 7–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vogel, J.S., Southen, J.R., Nelson, D.E. & Brown, T.A. 1984. Performance of Catalytically Condensed Carbon for Use in Accelerator Mass Spectrometry. Nuclear Instruments & Methods, 223(B5): 289–93.Google Scholar
von den Driesch, A. 1973. Tierknochenfunde aus dem frühbronzezeitlichen Gräberfeld von “El Barranquete”, Provinz Almeria, Spanien. Säugetierkundliche Mitteilungen, 21: 328–35.Google Scholar
Waterman, A.J., Beck, J.L., Thomas, J.T. & Tykot, R.H. Forthcoming. Stable Isotope Analysis of Human Remains from Los Millares (Almería, Spain, c. 2500-1800 bc): Regional Comparisons and Dietary Variability, Menga. Journal of Andalusian Prehistory, 8.Google Scholar
Whittle, A., Healy, F. & Bayliss, A. 2011. Gathering Time: Dating the Early Neolithic Enclosures of Southern Britain and Ireland. Oxford: Oxbow Books.Google Scholar