Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T10:22:24.272Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Optimal payment of mortgages

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 June 2007

DEJUN XIE
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15260, USA (email: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected])
XINFU CHEN
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15260, USA (email: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected])
JOHN CHADAM
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15260, USA (email: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected])

Abstract

This article provides a borrower's optimal strategies to terminate a mortgage with a fixed interest rate by paying the outstanding balance all at once. The problem is modelled as a free boundary problem for the appropriate analogue of the Black-Scholes pricing equation under the assumption of the Vasicek model for the short-term rate of investment. Here the free boundary provides the optimal time at which the mortgage contract is to be terminated. A number of integral identities are derived and then used to design efficient numerical codes for computing the free boundary. For numerical simulation, parameters for the Vasicek model are estimated via the method of maximum likelihood estimation using 40 years of data from US government bonds. The asymptotic behaviour of the free boundary for the infinite horizon is fully analysed. Interpolating this infinite horizon behaviour and a known near-expiry behaviour, two simple analytical approximation formulas for the optimal exercise boundary are proposed. Numerical evidence shows that the enhanced version of the approximation formula is amazingly accurate; in general, its relative error is less than 1%, for all time before expiry.

Type
Papers
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

[1]Baxter, M. & Rennie, A. (2005) Financial Calculus, An introduction to derivative pricing, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
[2]Buser, S. A. & Hendershott, P. H. (1984) Pricing default-free fixed rate mortgages. Housing Finance Rev. 3, 405429.Google Scholar
[3]Xinfu, Chen & Chadam, J. (2007) Mathematical analysis of an American put option. SIAM J. Math. Anal. 38, 16131641.Google Scholar
[4]Epperson, J., Kau, J. B., Keenan, D. C. & Muller, W. J. (1985) Pricing default risk in mortgages. AREUEA J. 13, 152167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[5]Friedman, A. (1982) Variational Principles and Free Boundary Problems. Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
[6]Jiang, L., Bian, B. & Yi, F. (2005) A parabolic variational inequality arising from the valuation of fixed rate mortgages. Eur J. Appl. Math. 16, 361–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[7]Kau, J. B. & Keenan, D. C. (1995) An overview of the option-theoretic pricing of mortgages. J. Housing Res. 6, 217244.Google Scholar
[8]Kau, J. B., Keenan, D. C., Muller, W. J. & Epperson, J. (1992) A generalized valuation model for fixed rate residential mortgages. J. Money Credit Bank 24, 279299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[9]Kau, J. B., Keenan, D. C., Muller, W. J. & Epperson, J. (1995) The valuation at origination of fixed rate mortgages with default and prepayment, J. Real Estate Finance Econ, 11, 539.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[10]Pozdena, R. J. & Iben, B. (1984) Pricing mortgages: an options approach. Econ Rev. 2, 3955.Google Scholar
[11]Vasicek, O. A. (1977) An equilibrium characterization of the term structure. J. Fin. Econ. 5, 177188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[12]Willmott, P. (1999) Derivatives, the theory and practice of financial engineering, Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
[13]Yuan, G., Jiang, L. & Luo, J. (2003) Pricing the FRM contracts-limiting on payment dates to prepay or default. Syst. Eng. - Theory Practice 23 (9), 4855.Google Scholar