Hostname: page-component-6bf8c574d5-2jptb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-21T13:15:14.523Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The onset of multi-valued solutions of a prescribed mean curvature equation with singular non-linearity

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 February 2013

N. D. BRUBAKER  and
A. E. LINDSAY
N. D. BRUBAKER
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematical Sciences, University of Delaware, Newark, DE 19716, USA email: [email protected]
A. E. LINDSAY
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics and Maxwell Institute for Mathematical Sciences, Heriot-Watt University, Edinburgh, EH14 4AS, UK email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The existence and multiplicity of solutions to a quasilinear, elliptic partial differential equation with singular non-linearity is analysed. The partial differential equation is a recently derived variant of a canonical model used in the modelling of micro-electromechanical systems. It is observed that the bifurcation curve of solutions terminates at single dead-end point, beyond which no classical solutions exist. A necessary condition for the existence of solutions is developed, revealing that this dead-end point corresponds to a blow-up in the solution's gradient at a point internal to the domain. By employing a novel asymptotic analysis in terms of two small parameters, an accurate characterization of this dead-end point is obtained. An arc length parameterization of the solution curve can be employed to continue solutions beyond the dead-end point; however, all extra solutions are found to be multi-valued. This analysis therefore suggests that the dead-end is a bifurcation point associated with the onset of multi-valued solutions for the system.

Keywords

Prescribed mean curvatureDisappearing solutionsSingular perturbationMEMSSingular non-linearity
Type
Papers
Information
European Journal of Applied Mathematics , Volume 24 , Issue 5 , October 2013 , pp. 631 - 656
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

[1]Brubaker, N. D. & Pelesko, J. A. (2011) Non-linear effects on canonical MEMS models. Eur. J. Appl. Math. 22, 455–470.Google Scholar
[2]Brubaker, N. D. & Pelesko, J. A. (2012) Analysis of a one-dimensional prescribed mean curvature equation with singular nonlinearity. Nonlinear Anal. 75, 5086–5102.Google Scholar
[3]Burns, M. & Grinfeld, M. (2011) Steady state solutions of a bi-stable quasi-linear equation with saturating flux. Eur. J. Appl. Math. 22, 317–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[4]Concus, P. & Finn, R. (1979) The shape of a pendent liquid drop. Philos. Trans. Roy. Soc. A 292, 307–340.Google Scholar
[5]Coullet, P., Mahadevan, L. & Riera, C. S. (2005) Hydrodynamical models for the chaotic dripping faucet. J. Fluid Mech. 526, 1–17.Google Scholar
[6]Dierkes, U., Hildebrandt, S. & Sauvigny, F. (2010) Minimal Surfaces, 2nd ed.Grundlehren der Mathematischen Wissenschaften series, Vol. 339, Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg, Germany.Google Scholar
[7]Esposito, P., Ghoussoub, N. & Guo, Y. (2010) Mathematical Analysis of Partial Differential Equations Modeling Electrostatic MEMS, Courant Lecture Notes in Mathematics, Vol. 20, AMS/CIMS, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[8]Finn, R. (1986) Equilibrium Capillary Surfaces, Grundlehren der Mathematischen Wissenschaften series, Vol. 284, Springer-Verlag, New York.Google Scholar
[9]Gilbarg, D. & Trudinger, N. S. (1983) Elliptic Partial Differential Equations of Second Order, 2nd ed., Grundlehren der Mathematischen Wissenschaften series, Vol. 224, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany.Google Scholar
[10]Guo, Y., Pan, Z. & Ward, M. J. (2005) Touchdown and pull-in voltage behavior of a MEMS device with varying dielectric properties. SIAM J. Appl. Math. 66, 309–338.Google Scholar
[11]Guo, Z. & Wei, J. (2008) Infinitely many turning points for an elliptic problem with a singular non-linearity. J. Lond. Math. Soc. 78 (2), 21–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[12]Le, V. K. (2008) On a sub-supersolution method for the prescribed mean curvature problem. Czechoslovak Math. J. 58, 541–560.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[13]Lindsay, A. E. & Ward, M. J. (2008) Asymptotics of some nonlinear eigenvalue problems for a MEMS capacitor. Part I: Fold point asymptotics. Methods Appl. Anal. 15, 297–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[14]Lindsay, A. E. & Ward, M. J. (2011) Asymptotics of some nonlinear eigenvalue problems modelling a MEMS capacitor. Part II: Multiple solutions and singular asymptotics. Eur. J. Appl. Math. 22, 83–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[15]Moulton, D. E. & Pelesko, J. A. (2008) Theory and experiment for soap-film bridge in an electric field. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 322, 252–262.Google Scholar
[16]Pan, H. (2009) One-dimensional prescribed mean curvature equation with exponential nonlinearity. Nonlinear Anal. 70, 999–1010.Google Scholar
[17]Pan, H. & Xing, R. (2011) Time maps and exact multiplicity results for one-dimensional prescribed mean curvature equations. Nonlinear Anal. 74, 1234–1260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[18]Pan, H. & Xing, R. (2011) Time maps and exact multiplicity results for one-dimensional prescribed mean curvature equations II. Nonlinear Anal. 74, 3751–3768.Google Scholar
[19]Pan, H. & Xing, R. (2012) Radial solutions for a prescribed mean curvature equation with exponential nonlinearity. Nonlinear Anal. 75, 103–116.Google Scholar
[20]Pelesko, J. A. & Bernstein, D. H. (2003) Modeling MEMS and NEMS, Chapman & Hall/CRC, Boca Raton, FL.Google Scholar
[21]Protter, M. H. & Weinberger, H. F. (1967) Maximum Principles in Differential Equations, Springer, New York.Google Scholar
[22]Pucci, P. & Serrin, J. (2007) The Maximum Principle, Progess in Nonlinear Differential Equations and Their Applications series, Vol. 73, Birkhauser Basel, Berlin, Germany.Google Scholar
[23]Wente, H. C. (1980) The symmetry of sessile and pendent drops. Pacific J. Math. 88, 387–397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar