Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T07:29:06.035Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On inverse problems in secondary oil recovery

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2008

VICTOR ISAKOV
VICTOR ISAKOV*
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics and Statistics, Wichita State University, Wichita, KS 67206, USA email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We review simple models of oil reservoirs and suggest some ideas for theoretical and numerical study of this important inverse problem. These models are formed by a system of an elliptic and a parabolic (or first-order hyperbolic) quasilinear partial differential equations. There are and probably there will be serious theoretical and computational difficulties mainly due to the degeneracy of the system. The practical value of the problem justifies efforts to improve the methods for its solution. We formulate ‘history matching’ as a problem of identification of two coefficients of this system. We consider global and local versions of this inverse problem and propose some approaches, including the use of the inverse conductivity problem and the structure of fundamental solutions. The global approach looks for properties of the ground in the whole domain, while the local one is aimed at recovery of these properties near wells. We discuss the use of the model proposed by Muskat which is a difficult free boundary problem. The inverse Muskat problem combines features of inverse elliptic and hyperbolic problems. We analyse its linearisation about a simple solution and show uniqueness and exponential instability for the linearisation.

Type
A Survey in Mathematics for Industry
Information
European Journal of Applied Mathematics , Volume 19 , Issue 4 , August 2008 , pp. 459 - 478
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

[1]Antontsev, S., Kazhikhov, A. & Monakhov, V. (1990) Boundary Value Problems in Mechanics of Nonhomogeneous Fluids, North-Holland, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
[2]Astala, K. & Paivarinta, L. (2006) Calderon's inverse conductivity problem in the plane. Ann. of Math. 163, 265–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[3]Bear, J. (1988) Dynamics of Fluids in Porous Media, Dover Publications, New York.Google Scholar
[4]Belishev, M. I. (1997) Boundary control in reconstruction of manifolds and metrics (the BC-method). Inverse Problems 13, R1–R45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[5]Bukhgeim, A. L. & Uhlmann, G. (2002) Recovering a potential from partial Cauchy data. Comm. Partial Differential Equations 27, 653–668.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[6]Chavent, G. & Jaffre, J. (1986) Mathematical Models and Finite Elements for Reservoir Simulation, North-Holland, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
[7]Chen, Z. (2001) Degenerate two-phase incompressible flow I: Existence, uniqueness, and regularity of a weak solution, J. Differential Equations 171, 203–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[8]Chen, Z. & Ewing, R. (1999) Mathematical analysis for reservoir models. SIAM J. Math. Anal. 30, 451–463.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[9]Di Christo, M. & Rondi, L. (2003) Examples of exponential instability for inverse inclusion and scattering problems. Inverse Problems 19, 685–701.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[10]Dullien, F. (1992) Porous Media: Fluid Transport and Pore Structure, Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
[11]Elayyan, A. & Isakov, V. (1997) On the inverse diffusion problem. SIAM J. Appl. Math. 57, 1737–1748.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[12]Eversen, G. (2007) Data Assimilation: The Ensemble Kalman Filter, Springer-Verlag, New York.Google Scholar
[13]Farmer, C. (2005) Geological modelling and reservoir simulation. In: Mathematical Methods and Modelling in Hydrocarbon Exploration and Production, Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg, pp. 119–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[14]Fluid Flow and Transport in Porous Media: Mathematical and Numerical Treatment (2002) Chen, Z. & Ewing, R. (editors), Contemporary Mathematics, 295, AMS, Providence, RI.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[15]Friedman, A. & Tao, Y. (2003) Nonlinear stability of the Muskat problem with capillary pressure at the free boundary. Nonlinear Anal. 53, 45–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[16]Gonzalez-Rodriguez, P., Kindelan, M., Moscoso, M. & Dorn, O. (2005) History matching problem in reservoir engineering using the propagation-backpropagation methods. Inverse Problems 21, 565–590.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[17]Isakov, V. (1988) On uniqueness of recovery of a discontinuous conductivity coefficient. Comm. Pure Appl. Math. 41, 865–877.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[18]Isakov, V. (2006) Inverse Problems for PDE, Springer-Verlag, New York.Google Scholar
[19]Isakov, V. (2007) On uniqueness in the inverse conductivity problem with local data. Inverse Problems and Imaging 1, 95–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[20]Katchalov, A., Kurylev, Y. & Lassas, M. (2000) Inverse Boundary Spectral Problems, Chapman and Hall/CRC, Boca Raton, FL.Google Scholar
[21]Kenig, C., Sjöstrand, J. & Uhlmann, G. (2007) The Calderon problem with partial data. Ann. of Math. 165, 567–591.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[22]Kohn, R. & Vogelius, M. (1985) Determining conductivity by boundary measurements. II, interior results. Comm. Pure Appl. Math. 40, 643–667.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[23]Ladyzenskaja, O. A. & Uralceva, N. N. (1968) Linear and Quasilinear Equations of Elliptic Type, Academic Press, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[24]Ladyzenskaja, O. A., Solonnikov, V. A. & Uralceva, N. N. (1968) Linear and Quasilinear Equations of Parabolic Type, Translations of Mathematical Monographs, 23, AMS, Providence, RI.Google Scholar
[25]Muskat, M. (1981) Physical Principles of Oil Production, International Human Resources Development, Boston, MA.Google Scholar
[26]Peaceman, D. W. (1978) Fundamentals of Numerical Reservoir Simulation, Elsevier, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
[27]Potthast, R. (2000) Point Sources and Multipoles in Inverse Scattering Theory, Chapman and Hall/CRC, Boca Raton, FL.Google Scholar
[28]Sever, A. (1999) On uniqueness in the inverse conductivity problem. Math. Methods Appl. Sci. 22, 953–966.3.0.CO;2-J>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[29]Siegel, M., Caflisch, R. & Howison, S. (2004) Global existence, singular solutions, and ill-posedness for the Muskat problem. Comm. Pure Appl. Math. 57, 1374–1411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[30]The Mathematics of Reservoir Simulation (1983) Ewing, R. (editor), SIAM, Philadelphia, PA.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[31]Yeh, W. (1986) Review of parameter identification procedures in groundwater hydrology, the inverse problem. Water Resour. Res. 22, 95–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar