Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T07:32:59.456Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Invasion around a horizontal wellbore

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2008

V. V. SHELUKHIN
V. V. SHELUKHIN*
Affiliation:
Lavrentyev Institute of Hydrodynamics, Lavrentyev pr. 15, Novosibirsk 630090, Russia email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A mathematical model is developed for mud cake growth and fluid invasion around a horizontal wellbore during drilling. The non-axisymmetry of the invasion front is addressed for the case of water based drilling mud and isotropic rock formation. It is shown that the invasion profile may lose convexity due to gravitation even though the filtrate density is the same as that of the pore fluid in the rock.

Type
Papers
Information
European Journal of Applied Mathematics , Volume 19 , Issue 1 , February 2008 , pp. 41 - 60
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

[1]Alpak, F. O., Dussan, E. B., Habashy, T. & Torres-Verdin, C. (2002) Numerical simulation of mud-filtrate invasion in horizontal wells and sensitivity analysis of array induction tools. SPWLA Ann. Log. Symp. June (2–5), 43.Google Scholar
[2]Chavent, G. & Jaffre, J. (1986) Mathematical models and finite elements for reservoir simulation. North-Holland, Amsterdam, 34.Google Scholar
[3]Ding, Y., Longeron, D., Renard, G. & Audibert, A. (2004) Modelling of both near-wellbore damage and natural cleanup of horizontal wells drilled with water-based drilling fluids. SPE Journal 9 (3), 252–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[4]Fisher, K. A., Wakeman, R. J., Chiu, T. W. & Meuric, O. F. J. (2002) Numerical modelling of cake formation and fluid loss from non-newtonian muds during drilling using eccentric/concentric drill strings with/without rotation. Trans. IChemE 78 (A), 707.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[5]Godlevski, E. & Raviart, P. A. (1991) Hyperbolic Systems of Conservation Laws. Mathematiques et Applications. SMAI. Ellipses, Paris, 34.Google Scholar
[6]Ishii, M. (1975) Thermo-fluid Dynamic Theory of Two-phase Flow. Eyrolles, Paris.Google Scholar
[7]Johnson, R. S. (1997) A Modern Introduction to the Mathematical Theory of Water Waves. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[8]Lu, W. M. & Ju, S. C. (1989) Selective particle deposition on crossflow filtration. Separ. Sci. and Technol. 24 (7–8), 517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[9]Moiseev, N.N. (1981) Asymptotic Methods of Nonlinear Mechanics. Science, Moscow. (in Russian).Google Scholar
[10]Peeters, M., Kovats, J., & Moita, C., et al. (2002) Monitoring and modeling invasion using ground penetrating radar and flow simulation programs. SPWLA Ann. Log. Symp. June (2–5), 43.Google Scholar
[11]Shelukhin, V. V. & Yeltsov, I. N. (2004) Invasion zones in lateral drilling. J. Appl. Mech. Tech. Phys. 45 (6), 834–842.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[12]Smaller, J. (1983) Shock Waves and Reaction-diffusion Equations. Berlin-Heidelberg-New York. Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[13]Stamatakis, K. & Tien, C. (1993) A simple model of crossflow filtration based on particle adhesion. AIChEJ 39 (8), 1292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[14]Thomas, B. & Sharma, M. M. (1997) Distribution of mud induced damage around horizontal wellbore. SPE International Simposium on Formation Damage Control, SPE 39468. Lafayette, Louisiana, February 18–19.Google Scholar