Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T07:13:38.040Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Mathematical model and method for spontaneous potential well-logging

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 September 2008

Li Tatsien
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, Fudan University, Shanghai 200433, China
Tan Yongji
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, Fudan University, Shanghai 200433, China
Peng Yuejun
Affiliation:
Union de Mathématiques Pures et Appliquées, Ecole Normale Supérieure de Lyon, 46 Aliée d'Italie, 69364 Lyon Cedex 07, France

Abstract

Spontaneous potential well-logging is an important technique in petroleum exploitation. To make the corresponding log interpretation chart, it is supposed that the geometrical structure of the formation, the resistivity in each subdomain, and the spontaneous potential difference on each interface are all known; then in the direct problem, the spontaneous potential u = u(r, z) satisfies an elliptic boundary value problem with jump conditions on interfaces. At the joint points A and B of the interfaces (figure 2), the jumps of the spontaneous potential do not, in general, satisfy the compatibility condition. It turns out that it is impossible to find a piecewise H1 solution to the problem, and the standard finite element method cannot be applied to get an approximate solution. In this paper, by means of a method of removing the singularities at A and B, it is proved that the problem admits a unique weak solution that is piecewise W1,p for any fixed p with 1 ≤ p <2. Moreover, based on this method a numerical scheme is suggested, and some numerical examples and some conclusions of practical interest are given. The techniques used in this paper will find a wider applicability in other problems.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

[1]Дахнов, B. H. 1959 Просмысловaя Геофuзuкa. Гостоптехиздат.Google Scholar
[2]Smits, L. J. M. 1968 SP log interpretation in shaly sands. Society of Petroleum Engineering Journal June, 123136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[3]LI, Ta-Tsien. 1989 A class of nonlocal boundary value problems for partial differential equations and its applications in numerical analysis. Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics 28, 4962.Google Scholar
[4]Li, Ta-Tsien, Tan, Yong-Ji, Peng, Yue-Jun & Li, Hai-Long. 1989 Mathematical methods for the SP well-logging. In Applied and Industrial Mathematics, Venice-1. Spigler, R., ed., Kluwer, 343349.Google Scholar
[5]Peng, Yue-Jun. 1988 A necessary and sufficient condition for the well-posedness of a class of boundary value problem. Journal of Tongji University 16, 91100 (in Chinese).Google Scholar
[6]Li, Ta-tsien 1980 Applications of the finite element method to electric well-logging. Petroleum Industry Press, Beijing (in Chinese).Google Scholar
[7]Yu, Wen-Ci & Tan, Yong-Ji. 1985 The geometric quantity representation for FEM equations. Math, in Practice & Theory 1, 5464 (in Chinese).Google Scholar