Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T03:02:30.955Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Homogenisation problems in reactive decontamination

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 September 2019

E. LUCKINS
Affiliation:
Mathematical Institute, University of Oxford, Radcliffe Observatory Quarter, Oxford, OX2 6GG, UK email:[email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]
C. J. W. BREWARD
Affiliation:
Mathematical Institute, University of Oxford, Radcliffe Observatory Quarter, Oxford, OX2 6GG, UK email:[email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]
I. M. GRIFFITHS
Affiliation:
Mathematical Institute, University of Oxford, Radcliffe Observatory Quarter, Oxford, OX2 6GG, UK email:[email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]

Abstract

The decontamination of hazardous chemical agents from porous media is an important and critical part of the clean-up operation following a chemical weapon attack. Decontamination is often achieved through the application of a cleanser, which reacts on contact with an agent to neutralise it. While it is relatively straightforward to write down a model that describes the interplay of the agent and cleanser on the scale of the pores in the porous medium, it is computationally expensive to solve such a model over realistic spill sizes.

In this paper, we consider the homogenisation of a pore-scale model for the interplay between agent and cleanser, with the aim of generating simplified models that can be solved more easily on the spill scale but accurately capture the microscale structure and chemical activity. We consider two situations: one in which the agent completely fills local porespaces and one in which it does not. In the case when the agent does not completely fill the porespace, we use established homogenisation techniques to systematically derive a reaction–diffusion model for the macroscale concentration of cleanser. However, in the case where the agent completely fills the porespace, the homogenisation procedure is more in-depth and involves a two-timescale approach coupled with a spatial boundary layer. The resulting homogenised model closely resembles the microscale model with the effect of the porous material being incorporated into the parameters. The two models cater for two different spill scenarios and provide the foundation for further study of reactive decontamination.

Type
Papers
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bruna, M. & Chapman, S. J. (2015) Diffusion in spatially varying porous media. SIAM J. Appl. Math . 75(4), 16481674.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chapman, S. J. (1991). Macroscopic models of superconductivity. PhD Thesis.Google Scholar
Dalwadi, M., Dubrovina, E., Eisentraeger, A., Lee, A., Maestri, J., Matejczyk, B., O’Kiely, D., Stamper, M. & Thomson, S. (2014) Toxic chemical and their neutralising agents in porous media. Technical Report, ESGI100, http://www.maths-in-industry.org/miis/671/Google Scholar
Dalwadi, M. P., Bruna, M. & Griffiths, I. M. (2016) A multiscale method to calculate filter blockage. J. Fluid Mech. 809, 264289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dalwadi, M. P., Griffiths, I. M. & Bruna, M. (2015) Understanding how porosity gradients can make a better filter using homogenization theory. Proc. Roy. Soc. A 471(2182), 20150464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dalwadi, M. P., O’Kiely, D., Thomson, S. J., Khaleque, T. S. & Hall, C. L. (2017) Mathematical modeling of chemical agent removal by reaction with an immiscible cleanser. SIAM J. Appl. Math . 77(6), 19371961 (2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fatima, T., Arab, N., Zemskov, E. P. & Muntean, A. (2011). Homogenization of a reaction–diffusion system modeling sulfate corrosion of concrete in locally periodic perforated domains. J. Eng. Math. 69(2–3), 261276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hornung, U.. (2012) Homogenization and Porous Media, vol. 6. Springer Science & Business Media.Google Scholar
Huppert, H. E. & Woods, A. W. (1995). Gravity-driven flows in porous layers. J. Fluid Mech. 292, 5569.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu, Y., Zheng, Z., & Stone, H. A. (2017). The influence of capillary effects on the drainage of a viscous gravity current into a deep porous medium. J. Fluid Mech. 817, 514559.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Printsypar, G., Bruna, M. & Griffiths, I. M. (2019). The influence of porous-medium microstructure on filtration. J. Fluid Mech. 861, 484516.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pritchard, D., Woods, A. W. & Hogg, A. J. (2001). On the slow draining of a gravity current moving through a layered permeable medium. J. Fluid Mech. 444, 2347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saffman, P. G.. (1971) On the boundary condition at the surface of a porous medium. Studies in Appl. Math . 50(2), 93101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schulz, R. & Knabner, P. (2017) Derivation and analysis of an effective model for biofilm growth in evolving porous media. Math. Methods Appl. Sci. 40(8), 29302948.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schulz, R. & Knabner, P. (2017) An effective model for biofilm growth made by chemotactical bacteria in evolving porous media. SIAM J. Appl. Math . 77(5), 16531677.CrossRefGoogle Scholar