Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-sjtt6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-05T15:17:44.067Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Thoracic epidural puncture guided by an acoustic signal: clinical results

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 December 2004

T. J. M. Lechner ,
M. G. F. van Wijk ,
A. J. J. Maas  and
F. R. C. van Dorsten
T. J. M. Lechner
Affiliation:
Jeroen Bosch Ziekenhuis, Department of Anaesthesiology and Pain Therapy, ’s-Hertogenbosch, The Netherlands
M. G. F. van Wijk
Affiliation:
Jeroen Bosch Ziekenhuis, Department of Anaesthesiology and Pain Therapy, ’s-Hertogenbosch, The Netherlands
A. J. J. Maas
Affiliation:
Jeroen Bosch Ziekenhuis, Department of Clinical Physics, ’s-Hertogenbosch, The Netherlands
F. R. C. van Dorsten
Affiliation:
Jeroen Bosch Ziekenhuis, Department of Anaesthesiology and Pain Therapy, ’s-Hertogenbosch, The Netherlands
Get access

Abstract

Summary

Background and objective: In previous studies we have demonstrated that it is possible and safe to identify the lumbar epidural space by an acoustic and visible signal. The use of an experimental set-up constructed for this purpose, the acoustic puncture assist device, the lumbar epidural puncture procedure became both audible and visible. In the present study we have extended the use of the device to localize the thoracic epidural space. We have also evaluated whether the device can be used as a practical tool to confirm correct catheter placement.

Methods: In 100 consecutive patients a prototype of the acoustic puncture assist device was connected to the epidural needle in order to localize the epidural space. The device translates the pressure encountered by the needle tip into a corresponding acoustic and visible signal and enables the anaesthesiologist to detect the epidural space by means of the acoustic signal. After catheter insertion, local anaesthetic was administered. Subsequently the epidural block was tested. In 10 patients the device was also connected to the epidural catheter after its insertion into the epidural space.

Results: In all 100 patients included in the study the epidural space was successfully located by means of the acoustic signal. The only recorded complication was intravascular catheter placement in two patients.

Conclusions: It is possible to localize the thoracic epidural space guided by an acoustic signal. The method was shown to be safe, reliable and simple. Potential implications of this technique include better needle control, improved monitoring for training purposes and for clinical documentation of the thoracic epidural puncture as well as identifying correct catheter placement.

Keywords

ANAESTHESIA, EPIDURAL, thoracicCATHETERS INDWELLING, epiduralACOUSTICS, techniqueTRANSDUCER, pressure
Type
Original Article
Information
European Journal of Anaesthesiology , Volume 21 , Issue 9 , September 2004 , pp. 694 - 699
Copyright
2004 European Society of Anaesthesiology

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Kopacz DJ, Neal JM, Pollock JE. The regional anesthesia ‘learning curve’. What is the minimum number of epidural and spinal blocks to reach consistency? Reg Anesth Pain Med 1996; 21: 182–190.Google Scholar
Kasai T, Yaegashi M, Tanaka Y. Spinal cord injury in a child caused by an accidental dural puncture with a single-shot thoracic epidural needle. Anesth Analg 2003; 96: 65–67.Google Scholar
Horlocker TT, Wedel DJ. Neurological complications of spinal and epidural anesthesia. Reg Anesth Pain Med 2000; 25: 83–98.Google Scholar
McLeod GA, Davies HTO, Munnoch N, Bannister J, Macrae W. Postoperative pain relief using thoracic epidural analgesia: outstanding success and disappointing failures. Anaesthesia 2001; 56: 75–81.Google Scholar
Burstal R, Wegener F, Hayes C, Lantry G. Epidural analgesia. Prospective audit of 1062 patients. Anaesth Intens Care 1998; 26: 165–172.Google Scholar
Ghia JN, Arora SK, Castillo M, Mukherji SK. Confirmation of location of epidural catheters by epidural pressure waveform and computed tomography cathetergram. Reg Anesth Pain Med 2001; 26: 337–341.Google Scholar
Tsui BC, Gupta S, Finucane B. Confirmation of epidural catheter placement using nerve stimulation. Can J Anaesth 1998; 45: 640–644.Google Scholar
Tsui BC, Guenther C, Emery D, Finucane B. Determining epidural catheter location using nerve stimulation with radiological confirmation. Reg Anesth Pain Med 2000; 25: 306–309.Google Scholar
Lechner TJM, van Wijk MGF, Maas AJJ. Clinical results with a new acoustic device to identify the epidural space. Anaesthesia 2002; 57: 768–772.Google Scholar
Lechner TJM, van Wijk MGF, Maas AJJ, et al. Clinical results with the acoustic puncture assist device, a new acoustic device to identify the epidural space. Anesth Analg 2003; 96: 1183–1187.Google Scholar
Guttierez A. Anesthesia metamerica peridural. Rev Cir Buenos Aires 1932; 12: 665–685.Google Scholar
Dogliotti AM. A new method of block anaesthesia. Segmental peridural spinal anaesthesia. Am J Surg 1933; 20: 107–118.Google Scholar
Blamey PJ, Cowan RS, Alcantara JI, Whitford LA, Clark GM. Speech perception using combinations of auditory, visual, and tactile information. J Rehabil Res Dev 1989; 26: 15–24.Google Scholar
Romer HC, Russell GN. A survey of the practice of thoracic epidural analgesia in the United Kingdom. Anaesthesia 1998; 53: 1016–1022.Google Scholar
Minzter BH, Johnson RF, Grimm BJ. The practice of thoracic epidural analgesia: a survey of academic medical centers in the United States. Anesth Analg 2002; 95: 472–475.Google Scholar