Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T08:31:34.593Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Sevoflurane requirement for laparoscopic tubal ligation: an electroencephalographic bispectral study

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 August 2006

A. Vakkuri
Affiliation:
Anaesthesia Research Group, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Helsinki University Central Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
A. Yli-Hankala
Affiliation:
Anaesthesia Research Group, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Helsinki University Central Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
K. Korttila
Affiliation:
Anaesthesia Research Group, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Helsinki University Central Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
L. Lindgren
Affiliation:
Fourth Department of Surgery, Helsinki University Central Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
Get access

Abstract

It has been shown in healthy volunteers that a concentration of volatile anaesthetic lower than 1 minimum alveolar concentration provides unconsciousness. We tested the hypothesis that, using the electroencephalogram bispectral index, less than 1 minimum alveolar concentration of sevoflurane can produce unconsciousness in patients. Anaesthesia was induced and maintained with sevoflurane in N2O and O2 (33%) in 32 ASA I-II women undergoing laparoscopic tubal ligation. For the first patient, the sevoflurane concentration was adjusted to 1 minimum alveolar concentration with an end-tidal concentration of 0.7%. The electroencephalogram bispectral index values were used to determine the concentration to be used for the next patient. The ED50 (effective dose) measured using end tidal concentrations of sevoflurane for laparoscopic tubal ligation in a 40-year-old patient was 0.70% (CI 95%: 0.63–0.77) and ED95 0.83% (CI 95%: 0.75–0.90). None of the patients had any operation-associated recall. It is concluded that the sevoflurane concentration needed for laparoscopic tubal ligation is not lower than 1 minimum alveolar concentration.

Type
Original Article
Copyright
1999 European Society of Anaesthesiology

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)