Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T09:24:05.513Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Percutanous dilatational tracheotomy in the ICU: a Norwegian survey focusing on perceived risk and safety attitudes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 November 2008

S. J. M. Sollid ,
K. Strand  and
E. Søreide
S. J. M. Sollid*
Affiliation:
Stavanger University Hospital, Division of Acute Care Medicine, Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Stavanger, Norway
K. Strand
Affiliation:
Stavanger University Hospital, Division of Acute Care Medicine, Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Stavanger, Norway
E. Søreide
Affiliation:
Stavanger University Hospital, Division of Acute Care Medicine, Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Stavanger, Norway
*
Correspondence to: Stephen J. M. Sollid, Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Division of Acute Care Medicine, Stavanger University Hospital, PO Box 8100, 4068 Stavanger, Norway. E-mail: [email protected]; Tel: +47 90663351; Fax: +47 51519932
Get access

Summary

Background and objectives

Despite its popularity, serious complications do occur with percutaneous dilatational tracheotomy in the ICU. The associated risks in daily practice are probably underestimated and may reflect system flaws in training and team function. This study was performed to obtain an impression of risk perception and safety culture in connection with percutaneous dilatational tracheotomy in Norwegian ICUs.

Methods

The Medical Director or intensivist on-call in the 30 ICUs participating in the Norwegian Intensive Care Registry was telephone interviewed using a semi-structured questionnaire. Data on the practice of tracheotomy and a qualitative assessment of complications experienced during the last 2 years were collected. In the second part, percutaneous dilatational tracheotomy operators in two ICUs were questioned about their perception of risk with percutaneous dilatational tracheotomy and asked to assess their own abilities as percutaneous dilatational tracheotomy operators and the training they had undergone.

Results

Of the 30 ICUs, 23 used percutaneous dilatational tracheotomy. The majority reported knowledge of severe complications like bleeding, hypoxia and tube dislodgment. Percutaneous dilatational tracheotomy-related deaths were also reported. Operators rated themselves relatively low and indicated the absence of any organized training. They acknowledged the known hazards related to percutaneous dilatational tracheotomy and suggested measures like fibreoptic guidance during the percutaneous dilatational tracheotomy and fewer operators with more experience as well as better team training, to improve patient safety.

Conclusion

Based on the frequent reporting of serious complications and the suggested safety precautions, we conclude that the percutaneous dilatational tracheotomy is considered a high-risk procedure and that there is still room for improving the safety of this much used ICU procedure.

Keywords

TRACHEOTOMY, percutaneousQUALITATIVE RESEARCH, interviewsINTENSIVE CARE UNITSSAFETY
Type
Original Article
Information
European Journal of Anaesthesiology , Volume 25 , Issue 11 , November 2008 , pp. 925 - 932
Copyright
Copyright © European Society of Anaesthesiology 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Ciaglia, P, Firsching, R, Syniec, C. Elective percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy. A new simple bedside procedure; preliminary report. Chest 1985; 87: 715–719.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2.Griggs, WM, Worthley, LI, Gilligan, JE, Thomas, PD, Myburg, JA. A simple percutaneous tracheostomy technique. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1990; 170: 543–545.Google ScholarPubMed
3.Anon, JM, Escuela, MP, Gomez, V, Garcia de Lorenzo, A, Montejo, JC, Lopez, J. Use of percutaneous tracheostomy in intensive care units in Spain. Results of a national survey. Intensive Care Med 2004; 30: 1212–1215.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4.Cooper, RM. Use and safety of percutaneous tracheostomy in intensive care. Report of a postal survey of ICU practice. Anaesthesia 1998; 53: 1209–1212.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5.Fikkers, BG, Fransen, GA, van der Hoeven, JG, Briede, IS, van den Hoogen, FJ. Tracheostomy for long-term ventilated patients: a postal survey of ICU practice in The Netherlands. Intensive Care Med 2003; 29: 1390–1393.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6.Fischler, L, Erhart, S, Kleger, GR, Frutiger, A. Prevalence of tracheostomy in ICU patients. A nation-wide survey in Switzerland. Intensive Care Med 2000; 26: 1428–1433.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7.Krishnan, K, Elliot, SC, Mallick, A. The current practice of tracheostomy in the United Kingdom: a postal survey. Anaesthesia 2005; 60: 360–364.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
8.Angel, LF, Simpson, CB. Comparison of surgical and percutaneous dilational tracheostomy. Clin Chest Med 2003; 24: 423–429.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
9.Dulguerov, P, Gysin, C, Perneger, TV, Chevrolet, JC. Percutaneous or surgical tracheostomy: a meta-analysis. Crit Care Med 1999; 27: 1617–1625.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
10.Freeman, BD, Isabella, K, Lin, N, Buchman, TG. A meta-analysis of prospective trials comparing percutaneous and surgical tracheostomy in critically ill patients. Chest 2000; 118: 1412–1418.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
11.Bartels, H. Tracheotomy and tracheostomy techniques. Chirurg 2005; 76: 507–514.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
12.Polderman, KH, Spijkstra, JJ, de Bree, R et al. Percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy in the ICU: optimal organization, low complication rates, and description of a new complication. Chest 2003; 123: 1595–1602.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
13.Edwards, SM, Williams, JC. Tracheal cartilage fracture with the Blue Rhino Ciaglia percutaneous tracheostomy system. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2001; 18: 487.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
14.Yurtseven, N, Aydemir, B, Karaca, P et al. PercuTwist: a new alternative to Griggs and Ciaglia’s techniques. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2007; 24: 492–497.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
15.Moorthy, K, Vincent, C, Darzi, A. Simulation based training. BMJ 2005; 330: 493–494.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
16.Merry, AF, Davies, JM, Maltby, JR. Qualitative research in health care. Br J Anaesth 2000; 84: 552–555.Google ScholarPubMed
17.Malterud, K. Qualitative research: standards, challenges, and guidelines. Lancet 2001; 358: 483–488.Google ScholarPubMed
18.Smith-Erichsen, N, Fredriksen, A. Organization and management of Norwegian intensive care units. Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen 2001; 121: 691–693.Google ScholarPubMed
19.Nates, NL, Cooper, DJ, Myles, PS, Scheinkestel, CD, Tuxen, DV. Percutaneous tracheostomy in critically ill patients: a prospective, randomized comparison of two techniques. Crit Care Med 2000; 28: 3734–3739.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
20.Van Heurn, LW, Mastboom, WB, Scheeren, CI, Brink, PR, Ramsay, G. Comparative clinical trial of progressive dilatational and forceps dilatational tracheostomy. Intensive Care Med 2001; 27: 292–295.Google ScholarPubMed
21.Anon, JM, Escuela, MP, Gomez, V et al. Percutaneous tracheostomy: Ciaglia Blue Rhino versus Griggs’ Guide Wire Dilating Forceps. A prospective randomized trial. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2004; 48: 451–456.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
22.Anon, JM, Gomez, V, Escuela, MP et al. Percutaneous tracheostomy: comparison of Ciaglia and Griggs techniques. Crit Care 2000; 4: 124–128.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
23.Wisborg, T, Castren, M, Lippert, A, Valsson, F, Wallin, CJ. Training trauma teams in the Nordic countries: an overview and present status. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2005; 49: 1004–1009.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
24.Blum, RH, Raemer, DB, Carroll, JS, Sunder, N, Felstein, DM, Cooper, JB. Crisis resource management training for an anaesthesia faculty: a new approach to continuing education. Med Educ 2004; 38: 45–55.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
25.Murray, WB, Foster, PA. Crisis resource management among strangers: principles of organizing a multidisciplinary group for crisis resource management. J Clin Anesth 2000; 12: 633–638.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
26.Howard, SK, Gaba, DM, Fish, KJ, Yang, G, Sarnquist, FH. Anesthesia crisis resource management training: teaching anesthesiologists to handle critical incidents. Aviat Space Environ Med 1992; 63: 763–770.Google ScholarPubMed
27.Flaatten, H, Gjerde, S, Heimdal, JH, Aardal, S. The effect of tracheostomy on outcome in intensive care unit patients. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2006; 50: 92–98.Google Scholar
28.Mayo, PH, Hackney, JE, Mueck, JT, Ribaudo, V, Schneider, RF. Achieving house staff competence in emergency airway management: results of a teaching program using a computerized patient simulator. Crit Care Med 2004; 32: 2422–2427.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
29.Rosenthal, ME, Adachi, M, Ribaudo, V, Mueck, JT, Schneider, RF, Mayo, PH. Achieving housestaff competence in emergency airway management using scenario based simulation training: comparison of attending vs housestaff trainers. Chest 2006; 129: 1453–1458.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
30.Blum, MG, Powers, TW, Sundaresan, S. Bronchoscopy simulator effectively prepares junior residents to competently perform basic clinical bronchoscopy. Ann Thorac Surg 2004; 78: 287–291; discussion 287–291.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
31.Moorthy, K, Smith, S, Brown, T, Bann, S, Darzi, A. Evaluation of virtual reality bronchoscopy as a learning and assessment tool. Respiration 2003; 70: 195–199.Google Scholar