Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T07:20:00.616Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Neuraxial blockade and patient risk

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 September 2005

D. Hunter
D. Hunter
Affiliation:
Department of Anaesthesia, Royal Brompton Hospital, London, UK
Get access

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Correspondence
Information
European Journal of Anaesthesiology , Volume 22 , Issue 10 , October 2005 , pp. 800
Copyright
© 2005 European Society of Anaesthesiology

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Kamming D, Davies W. Thoracic epidural analgesia for coronary artery surgery. A bridge too far? Eur J Anaesthesiol 2005; 22: 85–88.Google Scholar
Bogdanov A, Loveland R. Is there a place for interscalene block performed after induction of general anaesthesia? Eur J Anaesthesiol 2005; 22: 107–110.Google Scholar
Ho AM, Chung DC, Joynt GM. Neuraxial blockade and haematoma in cardiac surgery: estimating the risk of a rare adverse event that has not (yet) occurred. Chest 2000; 117: 551–558.Google Scholar
Judgments – Chester (Respondent) v. Afshar (Appellant) SESSION 2003–04 [2004] UKHL 41 on appeal from: [2002] EWCA Civ 724, http://www.parliament.the-stationery-office.co.uk/pa/ld200304/ldjudgmt/jd041014/cheste-1.htm