Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T11:17:32.350Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Haemodynamic monitoring during alkalinized lignocaine epidural block: A comparison with subarachnoid anaesthesia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 August 2006

A. Casati
Affiliation:
Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, University of Milan, IRCCS H San Raffaele, via Olgettina 60-20132, Milan, Italy
G. Fanelli
Affiliation:
Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, University of Milan, IRCCS H San Raffaele, via Olgettina 60-20132, Milan, Italy
P. Beccaria
Affiliation:
Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, University of Milan, IRCCS H San Raffaele, via Olgettina 60-20132, Milan, Italy
G. Aldegheri
Affiliation:
Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, University of Milan, IRCCS H San Raffaele, via Olgettina 60-20132, Milan, Italy
M. Berti
Affiliation:
Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, University of Milan, IRCCS H San Raffaele, via Olgettina 60-20132, Milan, Italy
M. Agostoni
Affiliation:
Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, University of Milan, IRCCS H San Raffaele, via Olgettina 60-20132, Milan, Italy
G. Torri
Affiliation:
Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, University of Milan, IRCCS H San Raffaele, via Olgettina 60-20132, Milan, Italy
Get access

Abstract

Cardiovascular responses after epidural alkalinized lignocaine and subarachnoid hyperbaric bupivacaine administration were studied using a non-invasive cardiac output measurement in 32 ASA Grade I–II patients undergoing orthopaedic leg surgery (hip hemi-arthroplasty or Ender nailing). All patients achieved adequate surgical anaesthesia. The block onset time was faster (P = 0.003), and the range of final sensory level wider (P = 0.006) in patients receiving spinal anaesthesia compared with the epidural group. Diastolic arterial pressure was significantly reduced when compared with base-line (P = 0.002) only in the spinal group. No significant changes in stroke volume, systemic vascular resistance or left ventricular stroke work were observed in either group. Heart rate and cardiac index were significantly reduced in the spinal group when compared both with base-line (P = 0.002; P = 0.04) and the epidural group (P = 0.001; P = 0.006). The results demonstrated that the block onset time and the cardiovascular effects produced by lumbar epidural anaesthesia, with alkalinized solutions, remain less than after spinal anaesthesia involving the same segments.

Type
Original Article
Copyright
1997 European Society of Anaesthesiology

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)