Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T02:14:10.119Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Demography of French anaesthesiologists. Results of a national survey by the French College of Anaesthesiologists (CFAR) and the French National Society of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care (SFAR), supported by the National Institute for Demographic Studies (INED)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 December 2004

S. Pontone ,
N. Brouard ,
P. Scherpereel ,
G. Boulard  and
P. Arduin
S. Pontone
Affiliation:
Institut National d'Etudes Démographiques (INED), Paris, France
N. Brouard
Affiliation:
Institut National d'Etudes Démographiques (INED), Paris, France
P. Scherpereel
Affiliation:
Collège Français des Anesthésistes Réanimateurs (CFAR), Paris, France
G. Boulard
Affiliation:
Société Française d'Anesthésie et de Réanimation (SFAR), Paris, France
P. Arduin
Affiliation:
Institut National d'Etudes Démographiques (INED), Paris, France
Get access

Abstract

Summary

Background and objective: The perception of a looming manpower shortage led the French College of Anaesthesiologists (CFAR) and the French Society of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care (SFAR), with assistance from the National Institute for Demographic Studies (INED), to conduct a national survey of French anaesthesiologists in order to determine precise physician characteristics data, analyse professional practices and project future service provision.

Methods: The survey was based on self-administered individual questionnaires, approved by the National Committee on Informatics and Freedom (CNIL). The survey was carried out at the end of 1998 among 1484 hospitals (590 public and 894 private), under the supervision of local referees and regional co-ordinators.

Results: Of 9741 anaesthesiologists' posts, 5694 (58%) are in public hospitals, 3569 (37%) in private practice and 478 (5%) in private hospitals within the National Health Service, i.e. the participant au service public hospitalier (PSPH). Complex validation of the results was necessary to account for the missing responses and multiple sites of activity. The survey identified 8876 specialists practising anaesthesia and intensive care in France at the beginning of 1999, including 216 in French overseas territories. This figure is consistent with that published by the Medical Council (Ordre des Médecins) on 1 January 1999, identifying 8950 anaesthesiologists in France, including 234 in the overseas territories. Annual growth in the anaesthesiologist population has fallen from 9% pre-1989 to 0% in 1999. Male anaesthesiologists outnumber females (35.7%). The average age has risen from 42.8 yr in 1989 to 45.9 yr in 1999. The age distribution of anaesthesiologists has become bell shaped, reflecting reduced numbers of younger practitioners. There are currently 14.75 anaesthesiologists per 100 000 people (compared to 12.9 in 1989), a figure slightly above the European average, but there is considerable geographical inequality between the north and south of France, with increased concentrations in large cities that contain university hospitals.

Conclusions: Future service provision must take account of falling numbers of new anaesthesiologists and an increase in retirements, but must also include changes in working practices, such as the European Working Time Directive. If anaesthesia manpower shortages are to be avoided, there must be a restructuring of the workplace, a redefinition of tasks and improved management of working time.

Keywords

ANAESTHESIOLOGYDELIVERY OF HEALTHCARE, health resources, health manpowerHEALTH SERVICES ADMINISTRATION, organization and administration, professional practice
Type
Original Article
Information
European Journal of Anaesthesiology , Volume 21 , Issue 5 , May 2004 , pp. 398 - 407
Copyright
2004 European Society of Anaesthesiology

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Schubert A, Eckhout G, Cooperider T, Kuhel A. Evidence of a current and lasting national anesthesia personnel shortfall: scope and implications. Mayo Clin Proc 2001; 76: 995–1010.Google Scholar
Donen N, King F, Reid D, Blackstock D. Canadian anesthesia physician resources: 1996 and beyond. Can J Anesth 1999; 46: 962–969.Google Scholar
Baele P, Bercq JP, Smets D, Somer A, Desantoine D. Can we predict the future evolution of anesthesiology workforce in Belgium? Acta Anaesthesiol Belg 1998; 49: 205–220.Google Scholar
Eckhout G, Schubert A, Tremper K. An updated forecast of the national anesthesia personnel shortfall. Anesthesiology 2002; 96: A1100.Google Scholar
Moyers J. The evolution of human resource needs in the USA. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol 2002; 16: 423–441.Google Scholar
Scherpereel P, Sondore A. The evolution of human resource needs in Europe. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol 2002; 16: 443–457.Google Scholar
Tiret L, Desmonts JM, Hatton F, Vourc'h G. Complications associated with anaesthesia – a prospective survey in France. Can Anaesth Soc J 1986; 33: 336–344.Google Scholar
Clergue F, Auroy Y, Péquignot F, Jougla E, Lienhart A, Laxenaire MC. French survey of anesthesia in 1996. Anesthesiology 1999; 91: 1509–1520.Google Scholar
Pontone S, Brouard N, Scherpereel P, Boulard G, Arduin P, et le groupe de projet CFAR–SFAR–INED. Les médecins anesthésistes-réanimateurs en France en 1999. Premiers résultats de l'enquête démographique nationale CFAR–SFAR–INED. Ann Fr Anesth Réanim 2002; 21: 779–806.Google Scholar
Conseil National de l'Ordre des Médecins. Démographie médicale française, situation au 31 décembre 1998.Ordre National des Médecins;1999; Etude 32.
Pontone S. Un modèle expérimental d'analyse et de projection démographiques: le cas de l'anesthésie réanimation. Gestions Hospitalières 2000; 401: 774–778.Google Scholar
Pontone S, Brouard N, Moulin J, Desmonts JM. Increasing shortage of anesthesiologists in France: how many are needed and when? Ann Fr Anesth Reanim 1991; 10: 362–378.Google Scholar
Pontone S, Brouard N. Facteurs influençant les besoins en médecins: un éclairage par spécialité. L'anesthésie réanimation. In: Démographie Médicale. Peut-on Évaluer les Besoins en Médecins?Paris, France: Credes, 2001: 85–96.
Caisse Nationale de l'Assurance Maladie des Travailleurs Salariés. Divers aspects de la démographie médicale. Dossier Études et Statistiques. 2000: 46.
Rolly G, MacRae WR, Blunnie WP, Dupont M, Scherpereel P.Anaesthesiological manpower in Europe. Eur J Anaesthesiol 1996; 13: 325–332.Google Scholar
Hotvedt R, Kristiansen IS. Doctor-staffed ambulance helicopters: to what extend can the general practioner replace the anaesthesiologist? Br J Gen Pract 2000; 50: 41–42.Google Scholar
Beebe DS, Tran P, Dragg M, Stillman A, Truwitt C, Belani KG. Trained nurses can provide safe and effective sedation for MRI in pediatric patients. Can J Anesth 2000; 47: 205–210.Google Scholar
Glance LG. The cost effectiveness of anesthesia workforce models: a simulation approach using decision-analysis modelling. Anesth Analg 2000; 90: 584–592.Google Scholar
Silber JH, Kennedy SK, Even-Shoshan O, et al. Anesthesiologist direction and patient outcomes. Anesthesiology 2000; 93: 152–163.Google Scholar
Van Aken H. Who should provide anaesthesia? Eur J Anaesthesiol 2000; 17: 535–536.Google Scholar
Booij LHD. The future of anaesthesiology. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2001; 18: 131–136.Google Scholar
Van Aken H, Thomson D, Smith G, Zorab J.150 years of anaesthesia – a long way to perioperative medicine: the modern role of the anaesthesiologist. Eur J Anaesthesiol 1998; 15: 520–523.Google Scholar
Webster NR. The anaesthetist as peri-operative physician. Anaesthesia 2000; 55: 839–840.Google Scholar