Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T14:15:17.754Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A comparison of remifentanil and fentanyl in patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 August 2006

P. W. Doyle
Affiliation:
Department of Anaesthesia, Box 93, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Hills Road, Cambridge CB2 2QQ, UK
J. P. Coles
Affiliation:
Department of Anaesthesia, Box 93, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Hills Road, Cambridge CB2 2QQ, UK
T. M. Leary
Affiliation:
Department of Anaesthesia, Box 93, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Hills Road, Cambridge CB2 2QQ, UK
P. Brazier
Affiliation:
Department of Anaesthesia, Box 93, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Hills Road, Cambridge CB2 2QQ, UK
A. K. Gupta
Affiliation:
Department of Anaesthesia, Box 93, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Hills Road, Cambridge CB2 2QQ, UK
Get access

Abstract

Background and aim We investigated the haemody-namic stability and emergence characteristics of isoflur-ane/nitrous oxide anaesthesia supplemented with remifentanil or fentanyl in patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy.

Methods Anaesthesia was induced with propofol (1–2mgkg−1) and either remifentanil (O.5μgkg−1) or fentanyl (1 μgkg−1), followed by an infusion of remifentanil (0.2 μg kg−1 min−1) or fentanyl (2 μg kg−1 h−1).

Results There were no significant differences between the groups in haemodynamic variables, postoperative pain, nausea or vomiting. After induction there was a significant decrease in mean arterial pressure for both groups (P<0.001) and a decrease in heart rate (P=0.001) in the remifentanil group. In both groups these haemodynamic changes continued during maintenance of anaesthesia (P<0.05). The time to eye opening after surgery was significantly shorter with remifentanil compared with fentanyl (6.62±3.89 vs. 18.0±15.18min, P=0.015).

Conclusion Remifentanil appears to be a comparable opioid to fentanyl when supplementing isoflurane/nitrous oxide anaesthesia for carotid endarterectomy.

Type
Original Article
Copyright
2001 European Society of Anaesthesiology

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)