Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T03:21:10.509Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Blink duration as a measure of low-level anaesthetic sedation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 August 2006

A. K. Jandziol ,
M. Prabhu ,
R. H. S. Carpenter  and
J. G. Jones
A. K. Jandziol
Affiliation:
University Department of Anaesthesia, Addenbrooke's Hospital, UK
M. Prabhu
Affiliation:
University Department of Anaesthesia, Addenbrooke's Hospital, UK
R. H. S. Carpenter
Affiliation:
Physiological Laboratory, Downing Street, Cambridge, UK
J. G. Jones
Affiliation:
University Department of Anaesthesia, Addenbrooke's Hospital, UK
Get access

Abstract

Background and objective Variability in blink duration was examined to see whether it was sensitive to sevoflurane sedation at 0.05 and 0.1 minimum alveolar concentration (MAC).

Methods Blinks were measured with an infrared transducer in eight subjects. Sedation was scored using a visual analogue scale (VAS).

Results At baseline, 0.05 and 0.1 MAC sevoflurane, respectively, the overall median value of blink duration and its interquartile range were 95 (80–110) ms, 198 (163–245) ms and 210 (130–980) ms. The median percentage of blinks exceeding 500 ms was 0% (0–0.7%), 33.3% (25.5–34.7%) and 25% (15.7–63.3%) respectively. Values during 0.05 and 0.1 MAC sevoflurane were significantly different from baseline (P < 0.035) but not from each other. Baseline visual analogue scales showed large intersubject variability. Compared with baseline, VAS scores were higher at 0.05 MAC (P < 0.035) but not at 0.1 MAC. After discontinuing sevoflurane, median blink duration returned to baseline with a recovery half-life of 2.6 min (R2 = 0.95).

Conclusion Blink duration is a sensitive measure of sevoflurane sedation even at 0.05 MAC.

Keywords

anaestheticsinhalationalsevofluraneanaesthesia and analgesiaconscious sedationanaesthesia recovery periodocular physiologyblinking
Type
Original Article
Information
European Journal of Anaesthesiology , Volume 18 , Issue 7 , July 2001 , pp. 476 - 484
Copyright
2001 European Society of Anaesthesiology

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)