Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T00:11:12.970Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Thiopental impairs neutrophil oxidative response by inhibition of intracellular signalling

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 August 2006

D. Fröhlich
Affiliation:
University of Regensburg, Department of Anaesthesiology, Regensburg, Germany
S. Wittmann
Affiliation:
University of Regensburg, Department of Anaesthesiology, Regensburg, Germany
G. Rothe
Affiliation:
University of Regensburg, Department of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine, Regensburg, Germany
G. Schmitz
Affiliation:
University of Regensburg, Department of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine, Regensburg, Germany
K. Taeger
Affiliation:
University of Regensburg, Department of Anaesthesiology, Regensburg, Germany
Get access

Abstract

Background and objective: Thiopental in clinically relevant concentrations inhibits the oxidative function of neutrophils, whereas only very high, non-therapeutic concentrations of methohexital induce a similar effect. The study characterized the molecular basis of this differential action of oxy- and thiobarbiturates on neutrophils.

Methods: Neutrophils were incubated in vitro with thiopental or methohexital using concentrations within the therapeutic range. Neutrophil responses were induced using different stimuli: N-formyl-L-methionyl-Lleucyl-L-phenylalanine (FMLP), C5a and 1,2-dioctanoyl-sn-glycerol (DiC8-DAG). FMLP and C5a bind to specific G-protein-coupled receptors that share the same second messenger cascade. In contrast, DiC8-DAG, an activator of protein kinase C, bypasses the signal transduction pathway downstream of the receptors. Hydrogen peroxide production by neutrophils was assessed using flow cytometry. To characterize the localization of the interaction site, FMLP receptor expression and cytosolic-free calcium were further analysed.

Results: FMLP and C5a-induced hydrogen peroxide production were both significantly impaired by thiopental, but not by methohexital. When postreceptor signalling was bypassed, by stimulation with DiC8-DAG, neither thiopental nor methohexital affected hydrogen peroxide production. Additionally, neither of the barbiturates impaired the cytosolic Ca2+ response.

Conclusions: We conclude that neither protein kinase C nor the hydrogen peroxide-generating enzymes are affected by thiopental or methohexital. The unimpaired Ca2+ response suggests that the function of the receptors and G-proteins were also unimpaired. Taken together, this indicates that the site of action of thiopental is in the cellular signalling upstream of protein kinase C.

Type
Original Article
Copyright
2002 European Society of Anaesthesiology

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)