Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T08:13:37.309Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Ropivacaine vs. levobupivacaine combined with sufentanil for epidural analgesia after lung surgery

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 December 2008

G. De Cosmo ,
E. Congedo ,
C. Lai ,
M. Sgreccia ,
A. Amato ,
G. Beccia  and
P. Aceto
G. De Cosmo*
Affiliation:
Policlinico A. Gemelli, Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Roma, Italy
E. Congedo
Affiliation:
Policlinico A. Gemelli, Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Roma, Italy
C. Lai
Affiliation:
Policlinico A. Gemelli, Psychiatry and Psychology Institute, Roma, Italy
M. Sgreccia
Affiliation:
Policlinico A. Gemelli, Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Roma, Italy
A. Amato
Affiliation:
Policlinico A. Gemelli, Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Roma, Italy
G. Beccia
Affiliation:
Policlinico A. Gemelli, Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Roma, Italy
P. Aceto
Affiliation:
Policlinico A. Gemelli, Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Roma, Italy
*
Correspondence to: Germano De Cosmo, Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, Policlinico A. Gemelli, Largo A. Gemelli 8, 00168 Roma, Italy. E-mail: [email protected]; Tel: +39 06 30154386; Fax: +39 06 3013450
Get access

Summary

Background and objectives

There are no clinical studies that compare epidural infusion of ropivacaine and levobupivacaine in patients undergoing lung surgery. The aim of this prospective, randomized double-blind study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of two commercially available solutions of ropivacaine (0.2% w/v) and levobupivacaine (0.125% w/v) when administered by continuous epidural infusion together with sufentanil in patients undergoing lung surgery.

Methods

After obtaining informed consent, 54 patients, ASA physical status I–III undergoing lung resection, were enrolled. Patients were randomly assigned to two groups in which analgesia was performed by continuous thoracic epidural infusion of ropivacaine 0.2% w/v (Group R) or levobupivacaine 0.125% w/v (Group L) with or without sufentanil 1 μg mL−1. After a test and a loading dose of each drug for the respective group, continuous epidural infusion, set at 5 mL h−1, began. General anaesthesia was standardized. In the recovery room, patients were provided with intravenous morphine patient-controlled analgesia. Visual analogue scale at rest and when coughing, rescue patient-controlled analgesia morphine amount, haemodynamics, sensory and motor block, sedation, nausea and vomiting, patient satisfaction score, were evaluated within 48 h.

Results

The two groups were similar regarding patient characteristics, quality of analgesia, level of sensory block, morphine consumption and satisfaction score. Postoperative haemodynamic profile was stable in all the patients. Minor side-effects occurred with a similar incidence. Motor block was not seen.

Conclusions

Equivalent volumes of ropivacaine (0.2% w/v) and levobupivacaine (0.125% w/v) provided similar static and dynamic analgesia with similar incidence of minor side-effects after thoracotomy.

Keywords

PAIN ACUTE AND POSTOPERATIVEEPIDURAL ANALGESIAROPIVACAINELEVOBUPIVACAINESURGERYTHORACIC
Type
Original Article
Information
European Journal of Anaesthesiology , Volume 25 , Issue 12 , December 2008 , pp. 1020 - 1025
Copyright
Copyright © European Society of Anaesthesiology 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Sabanathan, S, Richardson, J, Mearns, AJ. Management of pain in thoracic surgery. Br J Hosp Med 1993; 50: 114–120.Google ScholarPubMed
2.Sabanathan, S, Eng, J, Mearns, AJ. Alteration in respiratory mechanics following thoracotomy. J R Coll Surg Edinb 1990; 35: 144–150.Google ScholarPubMed
3.Peeters-Asdourian, C, Gupta, S. Choices in pain management following thoracotomy. Chest 1999; 115: 122S–124S.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4.Dickenson, AH. Spinal cord pharmacology of pain. Br J Anaesth 1995; 75: 193–200.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5.Tiippana, E, Nilsson, E, Kalso, E. Post-thoracotomy pain after thoracic epidural analgesia: a prospective follow-up study. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2003; 47: 433–438.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6.Finucane, BT, Ganapathy, S, Carli, F, Pridham, JN, Ong, BY, Shukla, RC. Prolonged epidural infusions of ropivacaine (2 mg/mL) after colonic surgery: the impact of adding fentanyl. Anesth Analg 2001; 92: 1276–1285.Google Scholar
7.Crews, JC, Hord, AH, Denson, DD, Schatzman, CA. Comparison of the analgesic efficacy of 0.25% w/v levobupivacaine combined with 0.005% morphine, 0.25% w/v levobupivacaine alone, or 0.005% morphine alone for the management of postoperative pain in patients undergoing major abdominal surgery. Anesth Analg 1999; 89: 1504–1509.Google Scholar
8.Albright, GA. Cardiac arrest following regional anaesthesia with etidocaine or bupivacaine. Anesthesiology 1979; 51: 285–286.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
9.Graf, BM, Abraham, I, Eberbach, N, Kunst, G, Stowe, DF, Martin, E. Differences in cardiotoxicity of bupivacaine and ropivacaine are the result of physicochemical and stereoselective properties. Anesthesiology 2002; 96: 1427–1434.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
10.Bardsley, H, Cristwood, R, Baker, H. A comparison of the cardiovascular effects of levobupivacaine and rac-bupivacaine following intravenous administration to healthy volunteers. Br J Pharmacol 1998; 46: 245–249.Google Scholar
11.Cristwood, RW, Greaves, JL. Levobupivacaine: a new safer long acting local anaesthetic agent. Expert Opin Invest Drug 1999; 8: 861–876.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12.Simpson, D, Curran, MP, Oldfield, V, Keating, GM. Ropivacaine: a review of its use in regional anaesthesia and acute pain management. Drugs 2005; 65: 2675–2717.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
13.Camorcia, M, Capogna, G, Lyons, G, Columb, M. Epidural test dose with levobupivacaine and ropivacaine: determination of ED(50) motor block after spinal administration. Br J Anaesth 2004; 92: 850–853.Google Scholar
14.Van de Velde, M, Dreelinck, R, Dubois, J et al. Determination of the full dose-response relation of intrathecal bupivacaine, levobupivacaine, and ropivacaine, combined with sufentanil, for labor analgesia. Anesthesiology 2007; 106: 149–156.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
15.Capogna, G, Camorcia, M, Columb, MO. Minimum analgesic doses of fentanyl and sufentanil for epidural analgesia in the first stage of labor. Anaesth Analg 2003; 96: 1178–1182.Google Scholar
16.McClellan, KJ, Fauls, D. Ropivacaine: an update of its use in regional anaesthesia. Drugs 2000; 60: 1065–1093.Google Scholar
17.Peduto, VA, Baroncini, S, Montanini, S et al. A prospective randomized double-blind comparison of epidural levobupivacaine 0.5% with epidural ropivacaine 0.75% for lower limb procedures. Eur J Anaesth 2003; 20: 979–983.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
18.Camorcia, M, Capogna, G. Epidural levobupivacaine ropivacaine and bupivacaine in combination with sufentanil in early labour: a randomized trial. Eur J Anaesth 2003; 20: 636–639.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
19.Launo, C, Gastaldo, P, Piccardo, F, Palermo, S, Demartini, A, Grattarola, C. Perioperative thoracic epidural analgesia in aortic surgery: role of levobupivacaine. Minerva Anesthesiol 2003; 69: 751–764.Google ScholarPubMed
20.Senard, M, Kaba, A, Jacquemin, MJ et al. Epidural levobupivacaine 0.1% or ropivacaine 0.1% combined with morphine provides comparable analgesia after abdominal surgery. Anesth Analg 2004; 98: 389–394.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
21.Kehlet, H. Multimodal approach to control postoperative pathophysiology and rehabilitation. Br J Anaesth 1997; 78: 606–617.Google Scholar
22.Murdoch, JA, Dickson, UK, Wilson, PA, Berman, JS, Gad-Elrab, RR, Scott, NB. The efficacy and safety of three concentrations of levobupivacaine administered as a continuous epidural infusion in patients undergoing orthopaedic surgery. Anesth Analg 2002; 94: 438–444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
23.Whiteside, R, Jones, D, Bignell, S, Lang, C, Lo, SK. Epidural ropivacaine with fentanyl following major gynaecological surgery: the effect of volume and concentration on pain relief and motor impairment. Br J Anaesth 2000; 84: 720–724.Google Scholar
24.McLeod, GA, Munishankar, B, Columb, MO. An isobolographic analysis of diamorphine and levobupivacaine for epidural analgesia in early labour. Br J Anaesth 2007; 98: 497–502.Google Scholar
25.George, MJ. The site of action of epidurally administered opioids and its relevance to postoperative pain management. Anaesthesia 2006; 61: 659–664.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed