Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T00:53:53.935Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A prospective, randomized, blinded comparison between continuous thoracic paravertebral and epidural infusion of 0.2% ropivacaine after lung resection surgery

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 July 2006

A. Casati ,
P. Alessandrini ,
M. Nuzzi ,
M. Tosi ,
E. Iotti ,
L. Ampollini ,
A. Bobbio ,
E. Rossini  and
G. Fanelli
A. Casati
Affiliation:
University of Parma, Department of Anaesthesiology and Pain Therapy, Parma, Italy
P. Alessandrini
Affiliation:
University of Parma, Department of Anaesthesiology and Pain Therapy, Parma, Italy
M. Nuzzi
Affiliation:
University of Parma, Department of Anaesthesiology and Pain Therapy, Parma, Italy
M. Tosi
Affiliation:
University of Parma, Department of Anaesthesiology and Pain Therapy, Parma, Italy
E. Iotti
Affiliation:
University of Parma, Department of Anaesthesiology and Pain Therapy, Parma, Italy
L. Ampollini
Affiliation:
University of Parma, Department of Thoracic Surgery, Ospedale Maggiore di Parma, Parma, Italy
A. Bobbio
Affiliation:
University of Parma, Department of Thoracic Surgery, Ospedale Maggiore di Parma, Parma, Italy
E. Rossini
Affiliation:
University of Parma, Department of Anaesthesiology and Pain Therapy, Parma, Italy
G. Fanelli
Affiliation:
University of Parma, Department of Anaesthesiology and Pain Therapy, Parma, Italy
Get access

Abstract

Summary

Background: The aim of this prospective, randomized, blinded study was to compare analgesic efficacy of continuous paravertebral and epidural analgesia for post-thoracotomy pain. Methods: Forty-two ASA physical status II–III patients undergoing lung resection surgery were randomly allocated to receive post-thoracotomy analgesia with either a thoracic epidural (group EPI, n = 21) or paravertebral (group PVB, n = 21) infusion of 0.2% ropivacaine (infusion rate: 5–10 mL h−1). The degree of pain at rest and during coughing, haemodynamic variables and blood gas analysis were recorded every 12 h for the first 48 h. Results: The area under the curve of the visual analogue pain score during coughing over time was 192 (60–444) cm h−1 in group EPI and 228 (72–456) cm h−1 in group PVB (P = 0.29). Rescue morphine analgesia was required in four patients of group EPI (19%) and five patients of group PVB (23%) (P = 0.99). The PaO2/FiO2 ratio reduced significantly from baseline values in both groups without between-group differences. The median (range) percentage reduction of systolic arterial pressure from baseline was −9 (0 to −9)% in group PVB and −17 (0 to −38)% in group EPI (P = 0.02); while clinically relevant hypotension (systolic arterial pressure decrease >30% of baseline) was observed in four patients of group EPI only (19%) (P = 0.04). Patient satisfaction with the analgesia technique was 8.5 (8–9.8) cm in group EPI and 9 (7.5–10) cm in group PVB (P = 0.65). Conclusions: Continuous thoracic paravertebral analgesia is as effective as epidural blockade in controlling post-thoracotomy pain, but is associated with less haemodynamic effects.

Keywords

POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD, analgesiaTHORACIC SURGERY, postoperative complicationsANAESTHESIA, EPIDURALANAESTHESIA CONDUCTION, paravertebral blockLOCAL ANAESTHETIC AGENTS, ropivacaine
Type
Original Article
Information
European Journal of Anaesthesiology , Volume 23 , Issue 12 , December 2006 , pp. 999 - 1004
Copyright
2006 European Society of Anaesthesiology

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Soto RG, Fu ES. Acute pain management for patients undergoing thoracotomy. Ann Thorac Surg 2003; 75: 1349–1357.Google Scholar
Slinger PD. Pro. Every post-thoracotomy patient deserves thoracic epidural analgesia. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 1999; 13: 350–354.Google Scholar
Ballantyne JC, Carr DB, de Ferranti Set al. The comparative effects of postoperative analgesic therapies on pulmonary outcome: cumulative meta-analyses of randomized, controlled trials. Anesth Analg 1998; 86: 598–612.Google Scholar
Licker M, Spiliopoulos A, Frey JGet al. Risk factors for early mortality and major complications following pneumonectomy for non-small cell carcinoma of the lung. Chest 2002; 121: 1890–1897.Google Scholar
Tonnesen E, Hohndorf K, Lerbjerg G, Christensen NJ, Huttel MS, Andersen K. Immunological and hormonal responses to lung surgery during one-lung ventilation. Eur J Anaesthesiol 1993; 10: 189–195.Google Scholar
Casati A, Mascotto G, Iemi K, Nzepa-Batonga J, De Luca M. Epidural block does not worsen patient oxygenation during one-lung ventilation for lung resection surgery performed under isoflurane general anaesthesia. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2005; 22: 363–368.Google Scholar
Horlocker TT. Thromboprophylaxis and neuraxial anesthesia. Orthopedics 2003; 26: S243–S249.Google Scholar
Richardson J, Sabanathan S, Jones J, Shah RD, Cheema S, Mearns AJ. A prospective, randomised comparison of preoperative and continuous balanced epidural or paravertebral bupivacaine on post-thoracotomy pain, pulmonary function and stress responses. Br J Anaesth 1999; 83: 387–392.Google Scholar
Vogt A, Stieger DS, Theurillat C, Curatolo M. Single-injection thoracic paravertebral block for postoperative pain treatment after thoracoscopic surgery. Br J Anaesth 2005; 95: 816–821.Google Scholar
Marret E, Bazelly B, Taylor Get al. Paravertebral block with ropivacaine 0.5% versus systemic analgesia for pain relief after thoracotomy. Ann Thorac Surg 2005; 79: 2109–2114.Google Scholar
Mascotto G, Bizzarri M, Messina Met al. Prospective, randomised, controlled evaluation of the preventive effects of positive end-expiratory pressure on patient oxygenation during one-lung ventilation. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2003; 20: 704–710.Google Scholar
Alessandrini P, Nuzzi M, Iotti Eet al. Postoperative analgesia after major lung resection surgery: a clinical comparison between continuous epidural and paravertebral analgesia. Minerva Anesthesiol 2005; 71 (S2): 71.Google Scholar
Browner WS, Black D, Newman B. Estimating sample size and power.Designing Clinical Research – an Epidemiologic Approach.Baltimore, USA: Williams & Wilkins, 1988: 139–150.
Bonde P, McManus K, McAnespie M, McGuigan J. Lung surgery: identifying the subgroup at risk for sputum retention. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2002; 22: 18–22.Google Scholar
Cannavo D. Use of neuraxial anesthesia with selective factor Xa inhibitors. Am J Orthop 2002; 31 (Suppl 11): 21–23.Google Scholar
Chaney MA, Labovsky JK. Thoracic epidural anesthesia and cardiac surgery: balancing postoperative risks associated with hematoma formation and thromboembolic phenomenon. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2005; 19: 768–771.Google Scholar
Davies RG, Myles PS, Graham JM. A comparison of the analgesic efficacy and side-effects of paravertebral vs epidural blockade for thoracotomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials. Br J Anaesth 2006; 96: 418–426.Google Scholar
Saito T, Den S, Cheema SPet al. A single-injection, multi-segmental paravertebral block: extension of somatosensory and sympathetic block in volunteers. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2001; 45: 30–33.Google Scholar
Naja MZ, Ziade MF, El Rajab M, El Tayara K, Lonqvist PA. Varying anatomical injection points within the thoracic paravertebral space: effect on spread of solution and nerve blockade. Anaesthesia 2004; 59: 459–463.Google Scholar
Cheema S, Richardson J, McGurgan P. Factors affecting the spread of bupivacaine in the adult thoracic paravertebral space. Anaesthesia 2003; 58: 684–687.Google Scholar
Cheema SP, Ilsley D, Richardson J, Sabanathan S. A thermographic study of paravertebral analgesia. Anaesthesia 1995; 50: 118–121.Google Scholar