Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T01:39:11.382Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Prediction of difficult laryngoscopy in obstetric patients scheduled for Caesarean delivery

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 September 2008

A. Honarmand  and
M. R. Safavi
A. Honarmand*
Affiliation:
Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
M. R. Safavi
Affiliation:
Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
*
Correspondence to: Azim Honarmand, Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran. E-mail: [email protected]; Tel: +98 913 1102327; Fax: +98 311 2361594
Get access

Summary

Background and objective

Failed intubation is an important cause of anaesthetic-related maternal mortality. The purpose of this study was to determine the ability to predict difficult visualization of the larynx from the following preoperative airway predictive indices, in isolation and combination: modified Mallampati test, the ratio of height to thyromental distance and the Upper-Lip-Bite test.

Methods

We collected data on 400 consecutive parturients scheduled for elective Caesarean delivery under general anaesthesia requiring endotracheal intubation and then assessed all three factors before surgery. An experienced anaesthesiologist, not apprised of the recorded preoperative airway assessment, performed the laryngoscopy and grading (as per Cormack and Lehane’s classification). Sensitivity, specificity and positive predictive value for each airway predictor in isolation and in combination were determined.

Results

Difficult laryngoscopy (Grade 3 or 4) occurred in 35 patients (8.75%). The ratio of height to thyromental distance had a higher sensitivity, positive predictive value and fewer false negatives than the other variables tested. The ratio of height to thyromental distance of 21.24 provided the best cut-off point for predicting subsequent difficult laryngoscopy. The odds ratio (95% CI) of the ratio of height to thyromental distance, Mallampati class and the Upper-Lip-Bite test were 127.8 (44.8–364.5), 49.8 (20.3–121.8) and 6.6 (2.29–19.30), respectively.

Conclusion

The ratio of height to thyromental distance may prove a useful screening test for predicting difficult laryngoscopy in obstetric population.

Keywords

ANAESTHESIA OBSTETRICALINTUBATION INTRATRACHEALLARYNGOSCOPY
Type
Original Article
Information
European Journal of Anaesthesiology , Volume 25 , Issue 9 , September 2008 , pp. 714 - 720
Copyright
Copyright © European Society of Anaesthesiology 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Department of Health. Why mothers die. Report on confidential enquiries into maternal deaths in the United Kingdom 1994–1996. London: Her Majesty’s Stationery Office, 1998.Google Scholar
2.Merah, NA, Foullkes-Crabbe, DJ, Kushimo, OT, Ajayi, PA. Prediction of difficult laryngoscopy in a population of Nigerian obstetric patients. West Afr J Med 2004; 23 (1): 38–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3.Department of Health. Report on confidential enquiries into maternal deaths in the United Kingdom 1982–1984. London: Her Majesty’s Stationery Office, 1989.Google Scholar
4.Endler, GC, Mariona, FG, Sokol, RJ, Stevenson, LB. Anesthesia-related maternal mortality in Michigan, 1972 to 1984. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1988; 159: 187–193.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5.Rocke, DA, Murray, WB, Rout, CC, Gouws, E. Relative risk analysis of factors associated with difficult intubation in obstetric anesthesia. Anesthesiology 1992; 77: 67–73.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6.Mallampati, SR, Gatt, SP, Gugino, LD et al. A clinical sign to predict difficult intubation: a prospective study. Can Anaesth Soc J 1985; 32: 429–434.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7.Hood, DD, Dewan, DM. Anesthetic and obstetric outcome in morbidly obese parturients. Anesthesiology 1993; 79: 1210–1218.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
8.Samsoon, GLT, Young, JRB. Difficult tracheal intubation: a retrospective study. Anaesthesia 1987; 42: 487–490.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
9.Pilkington, S, Carli, F, Dakin, MJ et al. Increase in Mallampati score during pregnancy. Br J Anaesth 1995; 74: 638–642.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
10.Savva, D. Prediction of difficult tracheal intubation. Br J Anaesth 1994; 73: 149–153.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
11.Khan, ZH, Kashfi, A, Ebrahimkhani, E. A comparison of the upper lip bite test (a simple new technique) with modified Mallampati classification in predicting difficulty in endotracheal intubation: a prospective blinded study. Anesth Analg 2003; 96: 595–599.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12.Butler, PJ, Dhara, SS. Prediction of difficult laryngoscopy: an assessment of thyromental distance and Mallampati predictive tests. Anaesth Intensive Care 1992; 20: 139–142.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
13.Tse, JC, Rimm, EB, Hussain, A. Predicting difficult endotracheal intubation in surgical patients scheduled for general anaesthesia: a prospective blind study. Anesth Analg 1995; 81: 254–258.Google ScholarPubMed
14.Randell, T. Prediction of difficult intubation. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 1996; 40: 1016–1023.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
15.Schmitt, HJ, Kirmse, M, Radespiel-Troger, M. Ratio of patient’s height to thyromental distance improves prediction of difficult laryngoscopy. Anaesth Intensive Care 2002; 30: 763–765.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
16.Lewis, M, Keramati, S, Benumof, JL, Berry, CC. What is the best way to determine oropharyngeal classification and mandibular space length to predict difficult laryngoscopy? Anesthesiology 1994; 81: 69–75.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
17.Cormack, RS, Lehane, J. Difficult tracheal intubation in obstetrics. Anaesthesia 1984; 39: 1105–1111.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
18.Schniederjans, MJ. Mathematical partitioning of the receiver operating curve: A diagnostic tool for medical decision making. Socioecon Plann Sci 1985; 19: 125–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19.Hanley, JA, McNeil, BJ. The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Radiology 1982; 143: 29–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
20.Bilgin, H, Ozyurt, G. Screening tests for predicting difficult intubation: a clinical assessment in Turkish patients. Anaesth Intensive Care 1998; 26: 382–386.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
21.Ross, BK. ASA closed claims in obstetrics: lessons learned. Anesthesiol Clin N Am 2003; 21: 183–197.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
22.Krobbuaban, B, Diregpoke, S, Kumkeaw, S, Tanomsat, M. The predictive value of the height ratio and thyromental distance: four predictive tests for difficult laryngoscopy. Anesth Analg 2005; 101 (5): 1542–1545.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
23.Calder, I. Useless ritual? Anaesthesia 2002; 57: 612.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
24.Oates, JD, Macleod, AD, Oates, PD et al. Comparison of two methods for predicting difficult intubation. Br J Anaesth 1991; 66: 305–309.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
25.Tham, EJ, Gildersleve, CD, Sanders, LD, Mapleson, WW, Vaughan, RS. Effects of posture, phonation and observer on Mallampati classification. Br J Anaesth 1992; 68: 32–38.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
26.Karkouti, K, Rose, DK, Ferris, LE et al. Inter-observer reliability of ten tests used for predicting difficult tracheal intubation. Can J Anaesth 1996; 43: 554–559.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed