Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T21:45:44.847Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The new PAXpress airway device during mechanical ventilation in anaesthetized patients: a prospective, randomized comparison with the laryngeal mask airway

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 December 2004

A. Casati ,
F. Vinciguerra ,
E. Spreafico ,
M. Putzu ,
D. Mamo  and
C. Marchetti
A. Casati
Affiliation:
Department of Anaesthesiology, Vita-Salute University of Milan, Milan, Italy
F. Vinciguerra
Affiliation:
Department of Anaesthesiology, Vita-Salute University of Milan, Milan, Italy
E. Spreafico
Affiliation:
Department of Anaesthesiology, Vita-Salute University of Milan, Milan, Italy
M. Putzu
Affiliation:
Department of Anaesthesiology, Vita-Salute University of Milan, Milan, Italy
D. Mamo
Affiliation:
Department of Anaesthesiology, Vita-Salute University of Milan, Milan, Italy
C. Marchetti
Affiliation:
Department of Anaesthesiology, Vita-Salute University of Milan, Milan, Italy
Get access

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Correspondence
Information
European Journal of Anaesthesiology , Volume 21 , Issue 8 , August 2004 , pp. 667 - 669
Copyright
2004 European Society of Anaesthesiology

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Brimacombe J. The advantages of the LMA over the tracheal tube or face mask: a meta-analysis. Can J Anesth 1995; 42: 1017–1023.Google Scholar
Casati A, Fanelli G, Casaletti E, Cappelleri GL, Magistris L, Aldegheri G. Do we need new supraglottic devices? Minerva Anestesiol 1999; 65: 823–830.Google Scholar
Mondello E, Casati A, Italian PAXpress Group. A prospective, observational evaluation of a new supraglottic airway: the PAXpress. Minerva Anestesiol 2003; 69: 517–522.Google Scholar
Ahmed SM, Maroof M, Khan RM, Singhal V, Rizvi KA. A comparison of the laryngeal mask airway and PAXpress for short surgical procedures. Anaesthesia 2003; 58: 42–44.Google Scholar
Brimacombe J. Analysis of 1500 laryngeal mask uses by one anaesthetist in adults undergoing routine anaesthesia. Anaesthesia 1996; 51: 76–80.Google Scholar
Hardman JG, Aitkenhead AR. Estimating alveolar dead space from the arterial to end-tidal CO2 gradient: a modelling analysis. Anesth Analg 2003; 97: 1846–1851.Google Scholar
Casati A, Fanelli G, Torri G. Physiological deadspace/tidal volume ratio during face mask, laryngeal mask, and cuffed oropharyngeal airway in anesthetized adult patients. J Clin Anesth 1998; 10: 652–655.Google Scholar