Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T13:28:49.624Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Myocardial protection by isoflurane vs. sevoflurane in ultra-fast-track anaesthesia for off-pump aortocoronary bypass grafting

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 March 2008

T. Hemmerling ,
J.-F. Olivier ,
N. Le ,
I. Prieto  and
D. Bracco
T. Hemmerling
Affiliation:
McGill University Health Center, Montreal General Hospital, Department of Anesthesiology, Montréal, Québec, Canada Montreal University Health Center, Hôtel-Dieu Hospital, Cardiac Surgery Department, Montréal, Québec, Canada
J.-F. Olivier
Affiliation:
McGill University Health Center, Montreal General Hospital, Department of Anesthesiology, Montréal, Québec, Canada
N. Le
Affiliation:
McGill University Health Center, Montreal General Hospital, Department of Anesthesiology, Montréal, Québec, Canada
I. Prieto
Affiliation:
Montreal University Health Center, Hôtel-Dieu Hospital, Cardiac Surgery Department, Montréal, Québec, Canada
D. Bracco*
Affiliation:
McGill University Health Center, Montreal General Hospital, Department of Anesthesiology, Montréal, Québec, Canada
*
Correspondence to: David Bracco, Department of Anesthesiology, Montreal General Hospital, McGill University Health Center, Room D-10-145-3, 1650 Cedar Avenue, Montréal, Québec, Canada H3G 1A4. E-mail: [email protected]; Tel: +1 514 934 1934. Ext. 43030; Fax: +1 514 934 8249
Get access

Summary

Background and objectives

Volatile anaesthetics have gained more popularity recently due to the potential for cardiac protection. Ultra-fast-track anaesthesia implies the immediate extubation after cardiac surgery. The purpose of this prospective randomized double-blind controlled study is to compare the cardioprotective effects of sevoflurane and isoflurane in off-pump cardiac bypass surgery.

Methods

Forty patients undergoing elective off-pump cardiac bypass surgery with high thoracic epidural analgesia and immediate extubation at the end of surgery were randomized into two groups. During surgery, anaesthesia was provided with either 1 minimum alvelolar anaesthetic concentration of sevoflurane or 1 minimum alvelolar anaesthetic concentration of isoflurane. Troponin-T, creatine kinase-MB, left ventricular wall motion anomalies, time to extubation, respiratory functions and haemodynamic parameters were compared between the two groups by analysis of variance.

Results

All patients were successfully extubated in the operating theatre with minimal postoperative pain. Serial creatine kinase-MB and troponin-T concentrations were not significantly different between the two volatile agents. Haemodynamic stability throughout surgery and contractility was not different between groups. However, extubation time was significantly shorter with sevoflurane (10 ± 5 min) compared to isoflurane (18 ± 4 min).

Conclusion

This study indicates that during off-pump cardiac bypass surgery, sevoflurane and isoflurane provide the same ischaemic cardioprotective effects. There is no difference for heart contractility and haemodynamic values during and after off-pump cardiac bypass surgery between the two agents. Sevoflurane allows a more rapid recovery from anaesthesia, but this does not translate into better pulmonary function or haemodynamics. Both agents are similar in ultra–fast-track off-pump cardiac bypass surgery.

Keywords

SURGERY CARDIACCARDIOPULMONARY BYPASSSEVOFLURANEISOFLURANETROPONIN TCREATININE KINASEMYOARDIAL ISCHAEMIA
Type
Original Article
Information
European Journal of Anaesthesiology , Volume 25 , Issue 3 , March 2008 , pp. 230 - 236
Copyright
Copyright © European Society of Anaesthesiology 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Warltier, DC, al-Wathiqui, MH, Kampine, JP, Schmeling, WT. Recovery of contractile function of stunned myocardium in chronically instrumented dogs is enhanced by halothane or isoflurane. Anesthesiology 1988; 69: 552–565.Google Scholar
2.Davis, RF, DeBoer, LW, Rude, RE, Lowenstein, E, Maroko, PR. The effect of halothane anesthesia on myocardial necrosis, hemodynamic performance, and regional myocardial blood flow in dogs following coronary artery occlusion. Anesthesiology 1983; 59: 402–411.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3.Cope, DK, Impastato, WK, Cohen, MV, Downey, JM. Volatile anesthetics protect the ischemic rabbit myocardium from infarction. Anesthesiology 1997; 86: 699–709.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4.Novalija, E, Fujita, S, Kampine, JP, Stowe, DF. Sevoflurane mimics ischemic preconditioning effects on coronary flow and nitric oxide release in isolated hearts. Anesthesiology 1999; 91: 701–712.Google Scholar
5.Belhomme, D, Peynet, J, Louzy, M, Launay, JM, Kitakaze, M, Menasche, P. Evidence for preconditioning by isoflurane in coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Circulation 1999; 100: II340–II344.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6.Penta de Peppo, A, Polisca, P, Tomai, F et al. . Recovery of LV contractility in man is enhanced by preischemic administration of enflurane. Ann Thorac Surg 1999; 68: 112–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7.Haroun-Bizri, S, Khoury, SS, Chehab, IR, Kassas, CM, Baraka, A. Does isoflurane optimize myocardial protection during cardiopulmonary bypass? J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2001; 15: 418–421.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
8.De Hert, SG, ten Broecke, PW, Mertens, E et al. . Sevoflurane but not propofol preserves myocardial function in coronary surgery patients. Anesthesiology 2002; 97: 42–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9.Conzen, PF, Fischer, S, Detter, C, Peter, K. Sevoflurane provides greater protection of the myocardium than propofol in patients undergoing off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery. Anesthesiology 2003; 99: 826–833.Google Scholar
10.Hemmerling, TM, Prieto, I, Choiniere, JL, Basile, F, Fortier, JD. Ultra-fast-track anesthesia in off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting: a prospective audit comparing opioid-based anesthesia vs thoracic epidural-based anesthesia. Can J Anaesth 2004; 51: 163–168.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
11.Scott, NB, Turfrey, DJ, Ray, DA et al. . A prospective randomized study of the potential benefits of thoracic epidural anesthesia and analgesia in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting. Anesth Analg 2001; 93: 528–535.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
12.Djaiani, G, Fedorko, L, Beattie, WS. Regional anesthesia in cardiac surgery: a friend or a foe? Semin Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2005; 9: 87–104.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
13.Loick, HM, Schmidt, C, Van Aken, H et al. . High thoracic epidural anesthesia, but not clonidine, attenuates the perioperative stress response via sympatholysis and reduces the release of troponin T in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting. Anesth Analg 1999; 88: 701–709.Google Scholar
14.Piriou, V, Chiari, P, Lhuillier, F et al. . Pharmacological preconditioning: comparison of desflurane, sevoflurane, isoflurane and halothane in rabbit myocardium. Br J Anaesth 2002; 89: 486–491.Google ScholarPubMed
15.Toller, WG, Kersten, JR, Pagel, PS, Hettrick, DA, Warltier, DC. Sevoflurane reduces myocardial infarct size and decreases the time threshold for ischemic preconditioning in dogs. Anesthesiology 1999; 91: 1437–1446.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
16.Meissner, A, Weber, TP, Van Aken, H, Zbieranek, K, Rolf, N. Recovery from myocardial stunning is faster with desflurane compared with propofol in chronically instrumented dogs. Anesth Analg 2000; 91: 1333–1338.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
17.Novalija, E, Varadarajan, SG, Camara, AK et al. . Anesthetic preconditioning: triggering role of reactive oxygen and nitrogen species in isolated hearts. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 2002; 283: H44–H52.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
18.Novalija, E, Hogg, N, Kevin, LG, Camara, AK, Stowe, DF. Ischemic preconditioning: triggering role of nitric oxide-derived oxidants in isolated hearts. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol 2003; 42: 593–600.Google Scholar
19.Mullenheim, J, Ebel, D, Frassdorf, J, Preckel, B, Thamer, V, Schlack, W. Isoflurane preconditions myocardium against infarction via release of free radicals. Anesthesiology 2002; 96: 934–940.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
20.Fujimoto, K, Bosnjak, ZJ, Kwok, WM. Isoflurane-induced facilitation of the cardiac sarcolemmal K(ATP) channel. Anesthesiology 2002; 97: 57–65.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
21.Stadnicka, A, Kwok, WM, Warltier, DC, Bosnjak, ZJ. Protein tyrosine kinase-dependent modulation of isoflurane effects on cardiac sarcolemmal K(ATP) channel. Anesthesiology 2002; 97: 1198–1208.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
22.Pouzet, B, Lecharny, JB, Dehoux, M et al. . Is there a place for preconditioning during cardiac operations in humans? Ann Thorac Surg 2002; 73: 843–848.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
23.De Hert, SG, Turani, F, Mathur, S, Stowe, DF. Cardioprotection with volatile anesthetics: mechanisms and clinical implications. Anesth Analg 2005; 100: 1584–1593.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
24.De Hert, SG, Cromheecke, S, ten Broecke, PW et al. . Effects of propofol, desflurane, and sevoflurane on recovery of myocardial function after coronary surgery in elderly high-risk patients. Anesthesiology 2003; 99: 314–323.Google Scholar
25.Blomberg, S, Emanuelsson, H, Kvist, H et al. . Effects of thoracic epidural anesthesia on coronary arteries and arterioles in patients with coronary artery disease. Anesthesiology 1990; 73: 840–847.Google Scholar
26.Fawcett, WJ, Edwards, RE, Quinn, AC, MacDonald, IA, Hall, GM. Thoracic epidural analgesia started after cardiopulmonary bypass. Adrenergic, cardiovascular and respiratory sequelae. Anaesthesia 1997; 52: 294–299.Google Scholar