Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T04:22:27.385Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Impossibility of injection through an epidural catheter caused by an incorrect connection of catheter and connector

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 July 2005

C. Harada
Affiliation:
Department of Anesthesiology, School of Medicine, Fukuoka University, Fukuoka, Japan
T. Sakuragi
Affiliation:
Department of Anesthesiology, School of Medicine, Fukuoka University, Fukuoka, Japan
K. Katori
Affiliation:
Department of Anesthesiology, School of Medicine, Fukuoka University, Fukuoka, Japan
K. Higa
Affiliation:
Department of Anesthesiology, School of Medicine, Fukuoka University, Fukuoka, Japan
Get access

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Correspondence
Copyright
© 2003 European Society of Anaesthesiology

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Browne RA, Politi VL. Knotting of an epidural catheter: a case report. Can J Anaesth 1979; 26: 142144.Google Scholar
Hsin ST, Chang FC, Tsou MY, et al. Inadvertent knotting of a thoracic epidural catheter. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2001; 45: 255257.Google Scholar
Khalouf FK, Kunkel FA, Freeman J. Stretching with obstruction of an epidural catheter. Anesth Analg 1987; 66: 12021203.Google Scholar
Raitt DG. Delayed blockage in an extradural catheter. Br J Anaesth 1980; 52: 242.Google Scholar
Cohen S, Amar D. A simple solution to blood clot obstruction of epidural catheter during labour. Can J Anaesth 1990; 37: 143144.Google Scholar
Chandhok D, Vijayakumar E. An unusual case of epidural catheter obstruction. Anesthesiology 1999; 91: 895896.Google Scholar
Gupta S, Singh B, Kachru N. ‘Blocked’ epidural catheter: another cause. Anesth Analg 2001; 92: 16161619.Google Scholar