Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-xbtfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T03:45:15.739Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Continuous spinal analgesia or opioid-added continuous epidural analgesia for postoperative pain control after hip replacement

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 December 2004

S. Gurlit ,
S. Reinhardt  and
M. Möllmann
S. Gurlit
Affiliation:
St. Franziskus-Hospital, Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Hohenzollernring, Münster, Germany
S. Reinhardt
Affiliation:
St. Franziskus-Hospital, Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Hohenzollernring, Münster, Germany
M. Möllmann
Affiliation:
St. Franziskus-Hospital, Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Hohenzollernring, Münster, Germany
Get access

Abstract

Summary

Background and objective: Continuous spinal anaesthesia and continuous epidural anaesthesia are both able to provide adequate postoperative pain relief. Combining local anaesthetics and opioids results in synergistic effects. The purpose of this randomized, prospective study was to compare quality of analgesia, side-effects and patient's satisfaction between spinal bupivacaine alone and epidural bupivacaine with sufentanil postoperatively.

Methods: Fifty-nine patients scheduled for hip arthroplasty were randomly assigned either to Group 1 receiving continuous spinal anaesthesia or Group 2 receiving continuous epidural anaesthesia. Postoperatively, those in Group 1 received a 1 mL bolus followed by a continuous infusion of 10 mL/24 h of bupivacaine 0.25%. Those in Group 2 received a 5 mL bolus of lidocaine 2%, followed by a continuous infusion of bupivacaine 0.25% with sufentanil 0.001 mg mL−1 at 4 mL h−1. Pain was measured using a verbal rating score and a visual analogue scale.

Results: Group 1 and Group 2 of 43.3% and 37.9% reported complete analgesia on the verbal rating score. No statistically significant difference was found in the visual analogue scale. Nausea and vomiting occurred significantly more often in Group 2. The patient satisfaction rates did not differ significantly.

Conclusions: Continuous spinal analgesia with bupivacaine alone and continuous epidural analgesia with bupivacaine/sufentanil are both effective for postoperative pain relief after hip replacement. Those patients in the epidural group reported better analgesia but had a higher rate of postoperative nausea and vomiting. Efficacy of pain therapy did not correlate with patient satisfaction.

Keywords

ANAESTHESIA, spinal, epidural, continuousANALGESICS LOCAL, lidocaine, bupivacaineANALGESICS, OPIOID, sufentanilSURGERY, ORTHOPAEDICS, hipPAIN, postoperativePOSTOPERATIVE NAUSEA AND VOMITING
Type
Original Article
Information
European Journal of Anaesthesiology , Volume 21 , Issue 9 , September 2004 , pp. 708 - 714
Copyright
2004 European Society of Anaesthesiology

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Cartwright PD, Helfinger RG, Howell JJ, Siepmann KK. Introducing an acute pain service. Anaesthesia 1991; 46: 188–191.Google Scholar
Ready LB, Oden R, Chadwick HS, Benedetti C, et al.Development of an anesthesiology-based postoperative pain management service. Anesthesiology 1988; 68: 100–106.Google Scholar
Kehlet H. Postoperative pain relief – what is the issue? (Editorial). Br J Anaesth 1994; 72: 375–378.Google Scholar
Kehlet H. General vs. regional anesthesia. In: Rogers M, Tinker J, Covino B, Longnecker DE, eds. Principals and Practice of Anesthesiology.St Louis, USA: C.V. Mosby, 1993: 1218–1234.
Melzack R, Abbott FV, Zackon W, Mulder DS, Davis MW. Pain on a surgical ward: a survey of the duration and intensity of pain and the effectiveness of medication. Pain 1987; 29: 67–72.Google Scholar
Mahoney OM, Noble PC, Davidson J, Tullos HS. The effect of continuous epidural analgesia on postoperative pain, rehabilitation and duration of hospitalization in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 1990; 260: 30–37.Google Scholar
Schug SA, Fry RA. Continuous regional analgesia in comparison with intravenous opioid administration for rou-tine postoperative pain control. Anaesthesia 1994; 49: 528–532.Google Scholar
Sutter PA, Gamulin Z, Forster A. Comparison of continuous spinal and continuous epidural anaesthesia for lower limb surgery in elderly patients. A retrospective study. Anaesthesia 1989; 44: 47–50.Google Scholar
Möllmann M. Die kontinuierliche Spinalanästhesie. Anästhesist 1997; 46: 616–621.Google Scholar
Standl T, Eckert S, Schulte am Esch J. Microcatheter continuous spinal anaesthesia in the post-operative period: a prospective study of its effectiveness and complications. Eur J Anaesthesiol 1995; 12: 273–279.Google Scholar
Hurley RJ, Lambert DH. Continuous spinal anaesthesia with a microcatheter technique: the preliminary experience in obstetrics and general surgery. Anesth Analg 1990; 70: 97–102.Google Scholar
Möllmann M, Holst D, Lübbesmeyer H, Lawin P. Continuous spinal anesthesia: Mechanical and technical problems of catheter placement. Reg Anesth 1993; 18: 469–472.Google Scholar
Standl TG, Horn E, Luckmann M, Burmeister M, Wilhelm S, Schulte am Esch J. Subarachnoid sufentanil for early postoperative pain management in orthopedic patient. A placebo-controlled, double-blind study using spinal microcatheters. Anesthesiology 2001; 94: 230–238.Google Scholar
Möllmann M, Cord S, Holst D, Auf der Landwehr U. Continuous spinal anaesthesia or continuous epidural anaesthesia for post-operative pain control after hip replacement? Eur J Anaesthesiol 1999; 16: 454–461.Google Scholar
Brodner G, Scherer R, van Aken H. Continuous spinal anaesthesia or continuous epidural anaesthesia for postoperative pain control after hip replacement. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2000; 17: 402–403.Google Scholar
Wiebalck A, Brodner G, van Aken H. The effects of adding sufentanil to bupivacaine for postoperative patient-controlled epidural analgesia. Anesth Analg 1997; 85: 124–129.Google Scholar
Brodner G, van Aken H. Durchbruch in der postoperativen Schmerztherapie. Sufentanil in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland für die postoperative Schmerztherapie zugelassen. Anästhesiol Intensivmed 2000; 41: 808–810.Google Scholar
Jensen MP, Karoly P, O'Riordan EF, Bland FJR, Burns RS. The subjective experience of acute pain. Clin J Pain 1989; 5: 153–159.Google Scholar
Lowson SM, Alexander JI, Black AMS, Bambridge AD. Epidural diamorphine infusions with and without 0.167% bupivacaine for postoperative analgesia. Eur J Anaesthesiol 1994; 11: 345–354.Google Scholar
Abboud TK, Zhu J, Sharp R, LaGrange C, Rosa C, Kassells B. The efficacy of intrathecal injection of sufentanil using a microspinal catheter for labor analgesia. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 1996; 40: 210–215.Google Scholar
Abouleish A, Abouleish E, Camann W. Combined spinal-epidural analgesia in advanced labour. Can J Anaesth 1994; 41: 575–578.Google Scholar
Albright GA, Forster RM. The safety and efficacy of combined spinal and epidural analgesia/anesthesia (6002 blocks) in a community hospital. Reg Anesth Pain Med 1999; 24: 117–125.Google Scholar
Liu WHD, Aitkenhead AR. Comparison of contemporaneous and retrospective assessment of postoperative pain using the visual analogue scale. Br J Anaesth 1991; 67: 768–771.Google Scholar
Sjöström B, Haljamäe H, Dahlgren LO, Lindström B. Assessment of postoperative pain: impact of clinical experience and professional role. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 1997; 41: 339–344.Google Scholar
Revill SI, Robinson JO, Rosen M, Hogg MI. The Reliability of a linear analogue for evaluating pain. Anaesthesia 1976; 31: 1191–1198.Google Scholar
Banos JE, Bosch F, Canellas M, Bassols A, Ortega F, Bigorra J. Acceptability of visual analogue scales in the clinical setting: a comparison with verbal rating scales in postoperative pain. Methods Find Exp Clin Pharmacol 1989; 11: 123–127.Google Scholar
White WD, Pearce DJ, Norman J. Postoperative analgesia: a comparison of intravenous on-demand fentanyl with epidural bupivacaine. Br Med J 1979; 2: 166–167.Google Scholar
Pugh GC, Drummond GB, Elton RA, Macintyre CC. Constant i.v. infusions of nalbuphine or buprenorphine for pain after abdominal surgery. Br J Anaesth 1987; 59: 1364–1374.Google Scholar
Crul BJ, Delhaas EM. Technical complications during long-term subarachnoid or epidural administration of morphine in terminally ill cancer patients: a review of 140 cases. Reg Anesth 1991; 16: 209–213.Google Scholar
Peyton PJ. Complications of continuous spinal anaesthesia. Anaesth Intensive Care 1992; 20: 417–425.Google Scholar
Hess JH. Postdural puncture headache: a literature review. AANA J 1991; 59: 549–555.Google Scholar
Mahisekar UL, Winnie AP, Vasireddy AR, Masters RW. Continuous spinal anesthesia and post dural puncture headache: a retrospective study. Reg Anesth 1991; 16: 107–111.Google Scholar
Crocker JS, Vandam LD. Concerning nausea and vomiting during spinal anesthesia. Anesthesiology 1959; 20: 587–592.Google Scholar
Niemi L, Pitkänen M, Tuominen M, Rosenberg PH. Technical problems and side-effects associated with continuous intrathecal or epidural post-operative analgesia in patients undergoing hip arthroplasty. Eur J Anaesthesiol 1994; 11: 469–474.Google Scholar