Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T23:04:25.413Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Anaesthesia for ultrasound guided oocyte retrieval: midazolam/remifentanil versus propofol/fentanyl regimens

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 August 2006

A. Casati
Affiliation:
Department of Anaesthesiology, University of Milan, IRCCS H. San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
G. Valentini
Affiliation:
Department of Anaesthesiology, University of Milan, IRCCS H. San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
A. Zangrillo
Affiliation:
Department of Anaesthesiology, University of Milan, IRCCS H. San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
R. Senatore
Affiliation:
Department of Anaesthesiology, University of Milan, IRCCS H. San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
A. Mello
Affiliation:
Department of Anaesthesiology, University of Milan, IRCCS H. San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
B. Airaghi
Affiliation:
Department of Anaesthesiology, University of Milan, IRCCS H. San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
G. Torri
Affiliation:
Department of Anaesthesiology, University of Milan, IRCCS H. San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
Get access

Abstract

To evaluate the quality of intra-operative anaesthesia and recovery characteristics of two different anaesthesia regimens, 60 healthy women undergoing ultrasound guided oocyte retrieval for in vitro fertilization procedures were randomly allocated to receive either a propofol/fentanyl or a midazolam/remifentanil based anaesthesia. The surgical procedure was successful in all patients and no severe side effects were reported by any patient. Four patients in the midazolam/remifentanil group (13%) would not accept the same anaesthetic procedure for further in vitro fertilization treatment due to intra-operative awareness, while all propofol/fentanyl patients were prepared to accept the same procedure again (P < 0.05). Patients in the propofol/fentanyl group required manual ventilation more frequently through a facemask than those patients treated with the midazolam/remifentanil combination (50% and 30%, respectively; P < 0.05). The time to achieve an Aldrete's score of 10 was shorter in the midazolam/remifentanil patients (2±2 min) than in those who received propofol/fentanyl (4±2 min) (P < 0.001), but no differences were observed in the time required to be ‘fit to discharge’ from the post-anaesthesia care unit. We conclude that the use of a midazolam/remifentanil regimen is as effective and safe as a fentanyl/propofol regimen in patients undergoing transvaginal oocyte retrieval for in vitro fertilization procedures.

Type
Original Article
Copyright
1999 European Society of Anaesthesiology

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)