Hungary's Constitutional Transformation

Kriszta Kovács; Gábor Attila Tóth

doi:10.1017/S1574019611200038

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Hungary – Democratic state structure – Two-thirds parliamentary majority – First flurry of constitutional amendments of 2010 – Checks and balances – Media – Ex post facto legislation – Hungarian Constitutional Court – Judicial review – Wholesale constitutional review and Basic Law of 2011

Crossref Citations

This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by Crossref.

Tóth, Gábor Attila 2013. Historicism or Art Nouveau in Constitutional Interpretation? A comment on Zoltán Szente'sThe Interpretive Practice of the Hungarian Constitutional Court—A Critical View. German Law Journal, Vol. 14, Issue. 8, p. 1615.

Susánszky, Pál Kopper, Akos and Tóth, Gergely 2016. Pro-government demonstrations in Hungary – citizens’ autonomy and the role of the media. East European Politics, Vol. 32, Issue. 1, p. 63.

Herman, Lise Esther 2016. Re-evaluating the post-communist success story: party elite loyalty, citizen mobilization and the erosion of Hungarian democracy. European Political Science Review, Vol. 8, Issue. 2, p. 251.

Priebus, Sonja 2016. Constitutional Politics in Central and Eastern Europe. p. 101.

Pap, András L. 2017. A Quarter Century of Post-Communism Assessed. p. 161.

Shevchenko, Alexei 2018. From a follower to a trendsetter: Hungary’s post-Cold War identity and the West. Communist and Post-Communist Studies, Vol. 51, Issue. 1, p. 63.

Roux, Theunis 2018. The Politico-Legal Dynamics of Judicial Review.

Kovács, Kriszta and Scheppele, Kim Lane 2018. The fragility of an independent judiciary: Lessons from Hungary and Poland—and the European Union. Communist and Post-Communist Studies, Vol. 51, Issue. 3, p. 189.

Bogaards, Matthijs 2018. De-democratization in Hungary: diffusely defective democracy. Democratization, Vol. 25, Issue. 8, p. 1481.

Biagi, Francesco 2019. European Constitutional Courts and Transitions to Democracy.

Margulies, Ben 2019. Falling in with the wrong crowd: linkage in the age of populism. Canadian Foreign Policy Journal, Vol. 25, Issue. 1, p. 54.

Duarte, Mariana Carmo 2019. Hungria: O Estado de Direito em Crise?. Political Observer | Revista Portuguesa de Ciência Política (Portuguese Journal of Political Science), p. 13.

Favi, Alessandra 2022. Protecting Asylum Seekers and Migrants in the Context of the Rule of Law Crisis in EU Member States: The Recent Approach of the Court of Justice of the EU through the Lens of the Global Compacts on Refugees and Migration. Laws, Vol. 11, Issue. 3, p. 37.

Scholtes, Julian 2022. Anti-Constitutional Populism. p. 401.

Roznai, Yaniv 2022. Constitutionalism in Context. p. 136.

2022. Anti-Constitutional Populism. p. 399.

Gomez, Gabriel and Leunig, Sven 2022. Fidesz, liberal democracy and the fundamental law in Hungary. Zeitschrift für Politikwissenschaft, Vol. 32, Issue. 3, p. 655.

Tepe, Sultan 2022. Populist party’s challenge to democracy: Institutional capture, performance and religion. Party Politics, Vol. 28, Issue. 4, p. 651.

Huber, Daniela and Pisciotta, Barbara 2023. From democracy to hybrid regime. Democratic backsliding and populism in Hungary and Tunisia. Contemporary Politics, Vol. 29, Issue. 3, p. 357.

Stachowiak-Kudła, Monika Westa, Sina Santos Botelho, Catarina and Bartha, Ildikó 2023. Academic Freedom as a Defensive Right. Hague Journal on the Rule of Law, Vol. 15, Issue. 1, p. 161.

Download full list

Article contents

Hungary's Constitutional Transformation

Abstract

Keywords

This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by Crossref.

Article contents

Hungary's Constitutional Transformation

Abstract

Keywords

Save article to Kindle

Save article to Dropbox

Save article to Google Drive

Reply to: Submit a response

Your details

You have entered the maximum number of contributors

Conflicting interests