Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-4rdpn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T20:30:05.998Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Getting Morality Right in Constitutional Adjudication - Boško Tripković, The Metaethics of Constitutional Adjudication (Oxford University Press 2017) pp. 272.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 November 2020

Pieter-Augustijn Van Malleghem
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Book Review
Information
European Constitutional Law Review , Volume 16 , Issue 3 , September 2020 , pp. 552 - 565
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of European Constitutional Law Review

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

Professor of Law, UCLouvain.

References

1 Regents of the University of California v Bakke, 438 US 265 (1978).

2 S v Makwanyane and Another 1995 (3) SA 391.

3 2 BvE 2/08.

4 The expression ‘schizoid attitude’ is Simon Blackburn’s.

5 See generally e.g. J. Waldron, Law and Disagreement (Oxford University Press 1999); R. Bellamy, Political Constitutionalism (Cambridge University Press 2007).

6 Roe v Wade, 410 US 113 (1973).