Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T14:09:53.035Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The ECJ’s Fatal Imbalance Its cavalier treatment of national security issues poses serious risk to public safety and sound commercial practices

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 July 2016

Richard A. Epstein
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'

Keywords

data protectionprivacyEUUS
Type
Case Comments
Information
European Constitutional Law Review , Volume 12 , Issue 2 , September 2016 , pp. 330 - 340
Copyright
Copyright © The Authors 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

Laurence A. Tisch Professor of Law, The New York University School of Law, Senior Fellow, The Hoover Institution, and the James Parker Hall Distinguished Service Professor of Law Emeritus, and Senior Lecturer, The University of Chicago Law School. My thanks to Craig Fligor and Manuel Valle, The University of Chicago Law School, Class of 2017, for their excellent research assistance.

References

1 ECJ 6 October 2015, Case C-362/14, Maximillian Schrems v Data Protection Commissioner.

2 Siddiqui, S., ‘Congress passes NSA surveillance reform in vindication for Snowden’, <www.theguardian.com/us-news/2015/jun/02/congress-surveillance-reform-edward-snowden>>Google Scholar, visited 22 June 2016.

3 Public Law 114-23, 2 June 2015, Uniting and Strengthening America by Fulfilling Rights and Ensuring Effective Discipline over Monitoring Act of 2015.

4 Warren, S.D. and Brandeis, L.D., ‘The Right to Privacy’, 4 Harvard Law Review (1890) p. 193 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

5 Gyves, M., ‘German DPAs Announce Policy Severely Limiting Mechanisms for Lawful Germany-to-U.S. Data Transfers’, <privacylaw.proskauer.com/2015/10/articles/european-union/german-dpas-announce-policy-severely-limiting-mechanisms-for-lawful-germany-to-u-s-data-transfers/>>Google Scholar, visited 22 June 2016.

6 Bywater, A. et al., ‘WP29 Lays Down Enforcement Gauntlet’, <www.corderycompliance.com/wp29-lays-down-enforcement-gauntlet/>>Google Scholar, visited 22 June 2016.

7 MacAskill, E., ‘The NSA’s bulk metadata collection authority just expired. What now?’, <www.theguardian.com/us-news/2015/nov/28/nsa-bulk-metadata-collection-expires-usa-freedom-act>>Google Scholar, visited 22 June 2016.

8 Haferkamp, H-P., Concepts, ‘Begriffsjurisprudenz/Jurisprudence of, Rechtsphilosophie’, Enzyklopädie zur, <www.enzyklopaedie-rechtsphilosophie.net/component/content/article/19-beitraege/105-jurisprudence-of-concepts>>Google Scholar, visited 22 June 2016. See also para. 94 of the Schrems opinion: ‘In particular, legislation permitting the public authorities to have access on a generalised basis to the content of electronic communications must be regarded as compromising the essence of the fundamental right to respect for private life, as guaranteed by Article 7 of the Charter’ (emphasis added): ECJ 6 October 2015, Case C-362/14, Maximillian Schrems v Data Protection Commissioner.

9 Epstein, R.A., ‘Toward a General Theory of Tort Law: Strict Liability in Context’, 3 Journal of Tort Law (2010) p. 6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

10 Hong, N., ‘Jury Finds Palestinian Authority, PLO Liable for Terrorist Attacks in Israel a Decade Ago’, <www.wsj.com/articles/jury-finds-palestinian-authority-plo-liable-for-terrorist-attacks-in-israel-a-decade-ago-1424715529?alg=y>>Google Scholar, visited 22 June 2016.

11 SDNY 16 January 2004, No. 04-CV-00397, Sokolow v Palestinian Liberation Organization.

12 Supra n. 1.

13 Supra n. 1.

14 The President’s Review Group on Intelligence and Communications Technologies, ‘Liberty and Security in a Changing World’, <www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/docs/2013-12-12_rg_final_report.pdf>, visited 22 June 2016.