Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T00:45:05.041Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Carl Schmitt: The Ultimate Illiberal? - Benjamin Schupmann, Carl Schmitt’s State and Constitutional Theory. A Critical Analysis (Oxford University Press2017), pp. 232.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 October 2019

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Book Review
Copyright
© 2019 The Authors 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

I am a philosopher of law and a legal professional. In the past I have done research in philosophy of law at the University of Leiden. Currently I work as a legal counsellor at the Council of State.

References

1 The Nazis and Communists formed a negative majority, for example, after the election of 31 July 1932. The Nazis became the biggest party, although they held no majority. They paired with the communists and other anti-republican parties to secure a majority, thus making a (majority) government by any union of pro-republican parties impossible. This was dubbed a negative majority since the parties involved would never normally have been allies.

2 Müller, J.-W., ‘Militant Democracy’, in Rosenfeld, M. and Sajó, A. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Constitutional Law (Oxford University Press 2012) p. 1253 Google Scholar.

3 Kirshner, A.S., A Theory of Militant Democracy: The Ethics of Combatting Political Extremism (Yale University Press 2014 CrossRefGoogle Scholar); Rummens, S. and Abts, K., ‘Defending Democracy: The Concentric Containment of Political Extremism58(4) Political Studies (2010) p. 649 CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Invernizzi Accetti, C. and Zuckerman, I., ‘What’s Wrong with Militant Democracy?65(1_supp) Political Studies (2017) p. 182 CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Sottiaux, S. and Rummens, S., ‘Concentric Democracy: Resolving the Incoherence in the European Court of Human Rights10(1) International Journal of Constitutional Law (2012) p. 106 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.