Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T06:12:44.029Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Writing a Scientific Paper III. Ethical Aspects

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 July 2011

C. Sterken
C. Sterken*
Affiliation:
Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Pleinlaan 2, 1050 Brussels, Belgium
Get access

Abstract

The main theme of this paper is truthful communication of scientific results. Therefore, concepts of truth, error, quality and value are elaborated.

The following bibliometric parameters are explained: the journal impact factor, the journal cited half-life, and the journal immediacy index, as well as paper counts, citation rates, citation index and the Hirsch index. These bibliometric indices and indicators are illustrated with examples derived from bibliometric analyses of the astronomical literature.

Scientific misconduct in the broadest sense is discussed by category: researcher misconduct, author misconduct, referee and grant-reviewer misconduct. But also publisher misconduct, editorial misconduct and mismanagement, and research supervisor misbehavior are dealt with. The overall signatures of scientific misconduct are focused on, as well as the causes and the cures. This is followed by a Section devoted to whistleblowing.

The biases of bibliometric indices, and the use and abuse of bibliometrics are illustrated. Moreover, suggestions for remediating the present defective system of bibliometric measurement and evaluation are worked out. Finally, the hopes and concerns of our students – either expressed during or after the lectures, or through subsequent private contacts – are passed on.

Type
Research Article
Information
European Astronomical Society Publications Series , Volume 50: Scientific Writing for Young Astronomers - Part 2 , 2011 , pp. 173 - 282
Copyright
© EAS, EDP Sciences 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Références

Abt, H.A., & Garfield, E., 2002, Is the Relationship Between Numbers of References and Paper Lengths the Same for All Sciences?, J. Amer. Soc. Inform. Sci. Technol., 53, 1106 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adams, J., Halliday, C., Mednick, A., Usdin, M., Bertout, C., & Walmsley, M., 2008, English language editing at A&A, A&A, 490, 19 Google Scholar
Agassi, J., 1981, The Problems of Scientific Validation, in On scientific discovery: the Erice lectures 1977, ed. M.D. Grmek, R.S. Cohen & G. Cimino (Dordrecht: D. Reidel), p. 103
Anderson, M.S., Ronning, E.A., De Vries, R., & Martinsons, B.C., 2007, The Perverse Effects of Competition on Scientists’ Work and Relationships, Sci. Eng. Ethics, 13, 437 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Angier, N., 2000, William Hamilton, 63, Dies; An Evolutionary Biologist (New York Times), March 10
Babbage, C., 1830, Reflections on the Decline of Science in England, and on Some of its Causes (London: Fellowes)
Barber, T.X., 1974, Pitfalls In Human Research. Ten Pivotal Points (Oxford: Pergamon Press Inc.)
Becker, B., & Milbourn, T., 2009, Reputation and competition: evidence from the credit rating industry (Harvard Business School Working Papers), 09-051
Belton, M.J.S., Thomas, P., Veverka, J., et al., 2007, The internal structure of Jupiter family cometary nuclei from Deep Impact observations, Icarus, 187, 332 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berger, P.A., Ginsburg, R.A., Barchas, J.D., et al., 1978, Platelet monoamine oxidase in chronic schizophrenic patients, Amer. J. Psych., 135, 95 Google ScholarPubMed
Berry , J.N. III, 2000, The Real Purpose of Copyright, Lib. J., 125, 6 Google Scholar
Bertout, C., & Schneider, P., 2004, Editorship and peer-review at A&A, A&A, 420, E1 Google Scholar
Bhandari, M., Einhorn, T.A., Swiontkowski, M.F., & Heckman, J.D., 2003, Who Did What? (Mis)Perceptions About Authors’ Contributions to Scientific Articles Based on Order of Authorship, J. Bone & Joint Surg., Amer., 85, 1605
Binet, A., 1900, La Suggestibilité (Paris: Schleicher Frères)
Boring, E.G., 1923, Intelligence as the Tests Test It, The New Republic, 34, 35 (reproduced in History, Psychology, and Science: selected papers, ed. R.I. Watson & D.T. Campbell, 1963 (New York: Wiley) Google Scholar
Boring, E.G., 1962, Newton and the Spectral Lines, Science, 136, 600 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bošnjak, L., Puljak, L., Vukojević, K., & Marušić, A., 2011, Analysis of a number and type of publications that editors publish in their own journals, Scientometrics, 86, 227 Google Scholar
Botez, E., 2004, Maximilian Hell and the Northernmost Transit of Venus Expedition of 1769, J. Astron. Data, 10, 7 Google Scholar
Bozzi, M.L., 2003, Truth and science: Bill Hamilton’s legacy, in Origin of HIV and emerging persistent viruses, Atti dei Convegni Lincei, ed. Acc. Naz. dei Lincei, 187, 21
Broad, W.J., 1981, The Publishing Game: Getting More for Less, Science, 211, 1137 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Broad, W., & Wade, N., 1982, Betrayers of the Truth: Fraud and Deceit in the Halls of Science (New York: Simon & Schuster)
Bronowski, J., 2008, Science and Human Values (London: Faber and Faber)
Brown, J.R., 2001, Who Rules in Science (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press)
Butler, D., 2008, Free journal-ranking tool enters citation market, Nature, 451, 6 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Burton, W.B., 2007, in Future Professional Communication in Astronomy, ed. A. Heck &L. Houziaux (Brussels: Académie Royale de Belgique), 47
Campanario, J.M., 1996, The Competition for Journal Space among Referees, Editors, and Other Authors and Its Influence on Journals’ Impact Factors, J. Amer. Soc. Inform. Sci., 47, 184 3.0.CO;2-U>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chandrasekhar, S., 1987, Truth and Beauty (Chicago: University of Chicago Press)
Chew, M., Villanueva, E.V., & Van Der Weyden, M.B., 2007, Life and times of the impact factor: retrospective analysis of trends for seven medical journals (1994–2005) and their Editors’ views, J. Royal Soc. Med., 100, 142 Google ScholarPubMed
Clayton, D.D., 2007, Hoyle’s Equation, Science, 318, 1876 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Clouthier, S.G., 2003, Plagiarism Erodes Scientific Integrity, Science, 301, 311 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Condon, J.J., 2009, No new observations, no new theories, enduring scientific value, A&A, 500, 219 Google Scholar
Crane, D., 1965, Scientists at Major and Minor Universities: A Study of Productivity and Recognition, Amer. Sociol. Rev., 699
Currie, C., 1997, Author saw fraud, misconduct, and unfairness to more junior staff, BMJ, 315, 744 Google ScholarPubMed
Cyranoski, D., 2007, Japanese TV show admits faking science, Nature, 445, 804 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
David, P., 1983, Scientific fraud: The system defends itself, Nature, 303, 369 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Delambre, J., & Méchain, P., 1806, Base du Système Métrique Décimal, Discours Préliminaire, p. 158–159
Dewatripont, M., Ginsburgh, V., Legros, P., et al., 2006, Study on the Economic and Technical Evolution of the Scientific Publication Markets in Europe, European Commission, Directorate-General for Research, Brussels, http://ec.europa.eu/research/science-society/pdf/scientific-publication-study_en.pdf
Dirac, P.A.M., 1963, The Evolution of the Physicist’s Picture of Nature, Scient. Amer., 208 (5)
Draaisma, D., 2005, Het verdriet van de kosmopoliet, www.douwedraaisma.nl/Lezing/Oratie.html
Duerbeck, H.W., Pustylnik, I., Steinle, H., & Sterken, C., 2002, Astron. Nachr., 323, 523 3.0.CO;2-2>CrossRef
Duerbeck, H.W., 2011, personal communication
Dugatkin, L.A., 2006, The Altruism Equation. Seven Scientists Search for the Origins of Goodness (Princeton University Press)
EASE, 2007, EASE statement on inappropriate use of impact factors, European Science Editing, 33, 99
EASE, 2009, Integrity in Science Communication, Tenth EASE General Assembly and Conference, 16–19 September 2009, Pisa, Italy
Eldakar, O.T., & Wilson, D.S., 2008, Selfishness as second-order altruism, Proc. Nation. Acad. Sci., 105, 6982 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Eisenstein, E., 2005, The Printing Revolution in Early Modern Europe, 2nd edition (Cambridge University Press)
Encke, J.F., 1820, Correspond. Astron., Géog., Hydrog. Stat., 4, 456 Google Scholar
Eysenck, H.J., & Kamin, L.J., 1981, The Intelligence Controversy (New York: Wiley)
Fancher, R.E., 1985, The Intelligence Men (New York: W.W. Norton & Co)
Feast, M., 2000, Stellar populations and the distance scale: the Baade-Thackeray correspondence, J. Hist. Astron., 31, 29 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feyerabend, P., 1987, Farewell to Reason (London: Verso)
Feynman, R.P., 1974, Cargo Cult Science, Eng. Sci., 37, 10 Google Scholar
Fletcher, H., 1982, My work with Millikan on the oil-drop experiment, Physics Today, June 1982, 43–47
Fowler, D.H., & Aksnes, D.W., 2007, Does self-citation pay?, Scientometrics, 72, 427 Google Scholar
Franklin, A., 1984, Forging, cooking trimming, and riding on the bandwagon, Amer. J. Phys., 52, 786 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Franklin, A., 1989, The Neglect of Experiment (Cambridge University Press)
Fuyuno, I., & Cyranoski, D., 2006, Nature, 441, 792 CrossRef
Garfield, E., 2006, The history and meaning of the journal impact factor, J. Amer. Med. Ass., 295, 93 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Garry, R.F., 2010, Retraction: Influenza or not influenza: Analysis of a case of high fever that happened 2000 years ago in Biblical time, Virol. J., 7, 190 Google Scholar
Gauss, C.F., 1824, Ehrenrettung, Astron. Nach., 3, 77 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gee, H., 2006, A day in the life of Henry Gee, Nature/Nurture, autumn, p. 3
Gingerich, O., 1982, Obituary – Payne-Gaposchkin Cecilia, Quart. J. Royal Astron. Soc., 23, 450 Google Scholar
Goodstein, D., 2002, Doing Business The Caltech Way: An Ethics Handbook, California Institute of Technology http://asic.caltech.edu/documents/2-doing_business_the_caltech_way.pdf
Goodstein, D., 2010, On Fact and Fraud (Princeton University Press)
Grant, B., 2009a, OA publisher accepts fake paper, The Scientist, 29 June 2009, http://www.the-scientist.com/blog/display/55756/
Grant, B., 2009b, Merck published fake journal, www.the-scientist.com/blog/display/55671/
Grothkopf, U., & Erdmann, C., 2008, Open Access – State of the Art, IAU Inf. Bull., 102, 64 Google Scholar
Gunsalus, C.K., 1998, How to Blow the Whistle and Still Have a Career Afterwards, Sci. Eng. Ethics, 4, 51 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Habing, H.J., 2009, Citation counts: trick or treat?, A&A, 500, 499 Google Scholar
Hearnshaw, J.B., 2010, Auguste Comte’s blunder: an account of the first century of stellar spectroscopy and how it took one hundred years to prove that Comte was wrong!, J. Astron. Hist. Herit., 13, 90 Google Scholar
Heisenberg, W., 1970, The Meaning of Beauty in the Exact Sciences, Munich
Herrnstein, R.J., 1973, I. Q. in the Meritocracy (Atlantic Monthly Press)
Hetherington, N.S., 1972, Adriaan van Maanen and Internal Motions in Spiral Nebulae: a Historical Review, Quart. J. Royal Astron. Soc., 13, 25 Google Scholar
Hetherington, N.S., 1983, Just how objective is science?, Nature, 306, 727 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heywood, E., 2008, Confidentiality, libel, peer review and the law, The Write Stuff, 17, 168 Google Scholar
Hindenburg, F., (Ed.), 1786, Leipziger Magazin für reine und angewandte Mathematik (Leipzig: Müller), 132
Hirsch, J.E., 2005, An index to quantify an individual’s scientific research output, Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci., 102, 16569 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Holmes, R., 1666, A Narrative Concerning the Success of Pendulum-Watches at Sea for the Longitudes, Phil. Trans. Royal Society of London, 1, 13 Google Scholar
Holton, G., 1978, The Scientific Imagination: Case Studies (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press)
Hon, K.L., Ng, P.C., & Leung, T.F., 2010, Influenza or not influenza: Analysis of a case of high fever that happened 2000 years ago in Biblical time, Virol. J., 7, 169 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Horton, R., 1998, The Journal Ombudsperson: A Step Toward Scientific Press Oversight, JAMA, 280, 298 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hoyle, F., 1954, On Nuclear Reactions Occuring in Very Hot Stars. I. The Synthesis of Elements from Carbon to Nickel, ApJS, 1, 121 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Janis, I.L., 1972, Victims of Groupthink: A Psychological Study of Foreign-policy Decisions and Fiascoes (Houghton Mifflin Company)
Jardine, L., 2010, Accidental Anglo-Dutch Collaborations: Seventeenth-Century Science in London and The Hague, Sarton Chair Lect. Univ. Gent, Sartoniana, 23, 15 Google Scholar
Jones, K.G., 1991, Messier’s Nebulae and Star Clusters (Cambridge University Press)
Kaiser, J., 2004, HHS Proposes Research Misconduct Rules, Science, 304, 501 Google Scholar
Kale, R., 2006, Changing China, Brit. Med. J., 333, 19 0August CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelly, C.D., & Jennions, M.D., 2006, The h index and career assessment by numbers, Trends Ecol. Evol., 21, 167 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelly, C.D., & Jennions, M.D., 2007, H-index: age and sex make it unreliable, Nature, 449, 403 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kennedy, D., 1985, On Academic Authorship, http://rph.stanford.edu/2-8.html
Kennedy, D., 1997, Academic Duty (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press)
Koen, C., & Lombard, F., 1993, The Analysis of Indexed Astronomical Time Series – Part One – Basic Methods, MNRAS, 263, 287 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kozak, M., 2010, personal communication
Krakovsky, M., 2009, Thriving on Selfishness: Why it Pays for Cheaters to Punish Other Cheaters, Scient. Amer., 300, 14 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kühr, H., Witzel, A., Pauliny-Toth, I.I.K., et al., 1981, A catalogue of extragalactic radio sources having flux densities greater than 1 Jy at 5 GHz, A&AS, 45, 367 Google Scholar
Langdon-Neuner, A.E., 2010, EASE forum, http://www.ease.org.uk/forum/index.shtml
Langmuir, I., 1954, Colloquium on Pathological Science, (transcribed from a tape recording, of the lecture on Pathological Science that Langmuir gave on December 18, 1953), http://www.cs.princeton.edu/˜ken/Langmuir/langmuir.htm
Lawrence, P.A., 2003, The politics of publication, Nature, 422, 259 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lee, A., Dennis, C., & Campbell, P., 2007, Nature’s guide for mentors, Nature, 447, 791 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lemaître, G., 1927, Un Univers homogène de masse constante et de rayon croissant, rendant compte de la vitesse radiale des nébuleuses extra-galactiques, Ann. Soc. Scient. Brux., XLVII, 49
Lippmann, W., 1922, The Abuse of the Tests, The New Republic, 32, http://www.disabilitymuseum.org/lib/docs/1726.htm
Lombard, F., & Koen, C., 1993, The Analysis of Indexed Astronomical Time Series – Part Two – the O − C / Observed – Calculated / Technique Reconsidered, MNRAS, 263, 309 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luyten, W.J., 1974, Stellar Motion Survey by Automation, Science, 185, 351 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Luyten, W.J., 1981, Plagiarism in astronomy, Proper motion survey with the 48-inch Schmidt telescope. LVIII – University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN
Mackintosh, N.J., 1980, Book review of Cyril Burt: Psychologist, Brit. J. Psychol., 71, 174 Google Scholar
Maddox, J., 1984, Privacy and the peer-review system, Nature, 312, 497 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maddox, J., 1989, Can journals influence science?, Nature, 339, 657 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Maddox, J., 1993, Competition and the death of science, Nature, 363, 667 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marcovitch, H., & Williamson, A., 2003, Editorial boards, European Ass. of Science Editors, June 2003
May, R.M., 2001, Memorial to Bill Hamilton, Phil. Trans. Royal Soc. London, Biol. Sci., 356, 785 Google Scholar
McSherry, C., 2001, Who Owns Academic Work? Battling for Control of Intellectual Property (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press)
Medawar, P., 1990, Pluto’s Republic (Oxford University Press)
Merton, R.K., 1968, The Matthew Effect in Science, Science, 159, 56 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Millikan, R.A., 1910, The Isolation of an Ion, a Precision Measurement of its Charge, and the Correction of Stokes’ Law, Science, 30 September 1910, 436–448
Millikan, R.A., 1911, The Isolation of an Ion, a Precision Measurement of its Charge, and the Correction of Stokes’ Law, Phys. Rev. 32, 349–397
Millikan, R.A., 1913, On the Elementary Electrical Charge and the Avogadro Constant, Phys. Rev., 2, 109 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mitroff, I.I., 1974, Studying the lunar-rock scientist, Saturday Rev. World, Nov. 2, 1974, 64–65 Google Scholar
Mommonier, M., 1996, How to Lie with Maps, 2nd edition (Chicago: University Of Chicago Press)
Monastersky, R., 2005, The Number that’s Devouring Science, Chron. High. Educ., 52, A12 Google Scholar
Newcomb, S., 1883, On Hell’s alleged falsification of his observations of the transit of Venus in 1769, MNRAS, 43, 371 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Öpik, E.J., 1973, The Optical Oblateness of Mars, Irish Astron. J., 11, 1 Google Scholar
Öpik, E.J., 1977, About Dogma in Science, and Other Recollections of an Astronomer, Ann. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 15, 1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parrish, D., & Noonan, B., 2009, Image Manipulation as Research Misconduct, Sc. Eng. Ethics, 15, 161 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Patkós, L., 2004, The Pasquich affair, Acta Hist. Astron., 24, 182 Google Scholar
Payne, C.H., 1925a, Stellar Atmospheres; a Contribution to the Observational Study of High Temperature in the Reversing Layers of Stars, Ph.D. Thesis, Radcliffe College
Payne, C.H., 1925b, Astrophysical Data Bearing on the Relative Abundance of the Elements, Proc. Nation. Acad. Sci. USA, 11, 192 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pierson, D.J., 2003, Padding the Impact Factor, http://www.wame.org/wame-listserve-discussions/impact-factor/
Piwowar, H.A., Day, R.S., & Fridsma, D.B., 2007, Sharing Detailed Research Data Is Associated with Increased Citation Rate, PLoS ONE www.plosone.org, doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0000308
Polderman, A.K.S., 2007, Keep your hands off our impact factor, Euro. Sci. Edit., 33, 98 Google Scholar
Popper, K., 1996, In Search of a Better World, Routledge
Potkin, S.G., Cannon, H.E., Murphy, D.L., & Wyatt, R.J., 1978, Are Paranoid Schizophrenics Biologically Different from Other Schizophrenics?, New Engl. J. Med., 298, 61 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Publishing Research Consortium, 2010, Access vs. Importance. A global study assessing the importance of and ease of access to professional and academic information (Phase I Results), http://www.publishingresearch.net/documents/PRCAccessvsImportanceGlobalNov2010_000.pdf
Quetelet, A., 1835, Sur l’homme et le développement de ses facultés (Paris: Bachelier)
Quetelet, A., 1842, A Treatise on Man and the Development of His Faculties (Edinburgh: W. & R. Chambers)
Quetelet, A., 1849, Letters addressed to H.R.H. the Grand Duke of Saxe Coburg and Gotha, on the Theory of Probabilities, Translated by O.G. Downes, London: Charles & Edwin Layton, Letter XX, Note p. 276
Racker, E., 1989, A view of misconduct in science, Nature, 339, 91 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reich, E.S., 2010, Self-plagiarism case prompts calls for agencies to tighten rules, Nature, 468, 745 Google Scholar
Rennie, D., Flanagin, A., & Yank, V., 2000, The Contributions of Authors, JAMA, 284, 89 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rosenthal, R., 1976, Experimenter effects in behavioral research (New York: Irvington Publishers), p. 31
Rossner, M., & Yamada, K.M., 2004, What’s in a picture? The temptation of image manipulation, J. Cell Biol., 166, 11 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rushton, J.P., 2002, New evidence on Sir Cyril Burt: His 1964 Speech to the Association of Educational Psychologists, Intelligence, 30, 555 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Russell, H.N., 1929, On the Composition of the Sun’s Atmosphere, ApJ, 70, 11 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Russell, N., 2009, Communicating Science: Professional, Popular, Literary (Cambridge University Press)
Salager-Meyer, F., 2009, Academic equality and cooperative justice, TESOL Quart., 43, 703–709 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schaefer, B.E., 2008, A Problem with the Clustering of Recent Measures of the Distance to the Large Magellanic Cloud, AJ, 135, 112 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schreiber, M., 1997, A case study of the Hirsch index for 26 non-prominent physicists, Ann. Phys. 16, 640 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schumacher, H.C., 1824, Ehrenrettung Pasquich’s. Geschichtserzählung, Astron. Nachr., 3, 65 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scott, T., 1997, Changing authorship system might be counterproductive, Brit. Med. J., 315, 744 Google ScholarPubMed
Sechrest, L.B., 1987, Approaches to Ensuring Quality of Data and Performance: Lessons for Science?, in Scientific Excellence, ed. D.N. Jackson & J.P. Rushton (Sage Publications), p. 253
Seeber, F., 2008, Citations in supplementary information are invisible, Nature, 2008, 887 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seglen, P.O., 1992, The Skewness of Science, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci., 43, 628 3.0.CO;2-0>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seglen, P.O., 1997, Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research, Brit. Med. J., 314, 497 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shermer, M., 2006, Fake, Mistake, Replicate, Scient. Amer., 295, 40 Google ScholarPubMed
Sieber, J.E., 1998, The Psychology of Whistleblowing, Sci. Eng. Ethics, 4, 7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skármeta, A., 1985, Ardiente Paciencia (Santiago de Chile: Pehuén)
Smith, R.S., 1997, Peer review: reform or revolution? Time to open up the black box of peer review, Brit. Med. J., 315, 759 Google Scholar
Snow, C.P., 1959, The Two Cultures and the Scientific Revolution (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press)
Snow, C.P., 1960, The Affair (A Strangers and Brothers novel, Thirsk: House of Stratus)
Sokal, A., 1996, Transgressing the Boundaries: Towards a Transformative Hermeneutics of Quantum Gravity (Social Text, Duke University Press), 46/47, 217
Stearns, L., 1992, Copy Wrong: Plagiarism, Process, Property, and the Law, Calif. Law Rev., 80, 513 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sterken, C., 1988, in Coordination of Observational Projects in Astronomy, ed. C. Jaschek & C. Sterken (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press)
Sterken, C., 2002, ESO and European astronomy: four decades of reciprocity, Astron. Nachr., 323, 555 3.0.CO;2-J>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sterken, C., 2005, The Light-Time Effect in Astrophysics: Causes and Cures of the O − C Diagram, ed. Sterken, C. (San Francisco: Astronomical Society of the Pacific), ASP Conf. Ser., 335, 178 Google Scholar
Sterken, C., 2006, Advice on Writing a Scientific Paper, in Astrophysics of Variable Stars, ed. Sterken, C. and Aerts, C. (San Francisco: Astronomical Society of the Pacific), ASP Conf. Ser., 349, 445, http://www.aspbooks.org/publications/349-0445.pdf
Sterken, C., 2011, Just one new measurement of the B[e] supergiant Hen-S22, IBVS, 6000
Sterken, C., & Aerts, C., 2006, Astrophysics of Variable Stars, ed. Sterken, C. and Aerts, C. (San Francisco: Astronomical Society of the Pacific), ASP Conf. Ser., 349
Stern, W., 1912, The Psychological Methods of Intelligence Testing, (Translated by G. Whipple) (Baltimore: Warwick and York)
Sterne, T.E., 1934, Appendix B: The Method of Computing e and s from the Means of Dates of Maximum, Distributed Regularly or Irregularly in Time, Harvard Coll. Obs. Circ., 386, 32 Google Scholar
Swazey, J.P., 1999, Commentary on Lubalin and Matheson’s “The Fallout: What Happens to Whistleblowers...”, Sci. Eng. Ethics, 5, 251 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tarnow, E., 1999, The Authorship List in Science: Junior Physicists’ Perceptions of Who Appears and Why, Sci. Eng. Ethics, 5, 73 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tarnow, E., 2002, Coauthorship in Physics, Sci. Eng. Ethics, 8, 175 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tennant D., 2006, Editorial integrity, Computerworld, October 9
Tenopir, C., 2010, personal communication
Tenopir, C., Allard, S., Bates, B., et al., 2010, Research Publication Characteristics and Their Relative Values: A Report for the Publishing Research Consortium, Center for Information and Communication Studies University of Tennessee, www.publishingresearch.net/PRCTenopiretalWord2010ResearchPublicationCharacteristics_000.docx
Terrall, M., 2002, The Man Who Flattened the Earth: Maupertuis and the Sciences in the Enlightenment (Chicago: University Of Chicago Press)
Tierney, W.M., 2005, Impact Factor and Journal Importance, http://www.wame.org/wame-listserve-discussions/impact-factor-and-journal-importance
Tort, A.B.L., & Amaral, O.B., 2007, Measures for measures, but are we measuring right?, Nature/Nurture, Spring 2007
Toy, J., 2002, The Ingelfinger Rule: Franz Ingelfinger at the New England Journal of Medicine 1967–77, Science Editor, 25, 195 Google Scholar
Tuchman, B.W., 1984, The March of Folly: From Troy to Vietnam (New York: Ballantine)
Vanclay, J.K., 2009, Bias in the journal impact factor, Scientometrics, 78, 3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van de Looverbosch, M., & Deltour, P., 2011, Media onder vuur, De Standaard 19 January 2011, p. 22
van Maanen, A., 1916, Preliminary evidence of internal motion in the spiral nebula Messier 101, ApJ, 44, 210 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watson, J.D., 2007, Avoid Boring People (Oxford: Oxford University Press)
Watson, R.I., & Campbell, D.T., (Eds.), 1963, History, Psychology, and Science: selected papers (New York: Wiley)
Weil, V., 2001, Mentoring: Some Ethical Considerations, Sci. Eng. Ethics, 7, 471 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wen, Q., & Gao, Y., 2007, Dual publication and academic inequality, Internat. J. Appl. Lingu., 17, 221 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
West, R.M., 2006, The Messenger, 124, 37
Wilcox, L.J., 1998, Authorship: The Coin of the Realm, The Source of Complaints, JAMA, 280, 216 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wilcox, L.J., 2010, personal communication
Wilson, J.R., 2002, Responsible Authorship and Peer Review, Sci. Eng. Ethics, 8, 155 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wright, M., & Armstrong, J.S., 2007, Verification of Citations: Fawlty Towers of Knowledge?, Munich Personal RePEc Archive, 4149, mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/ Some additional readings:
Committee on Science, Engineering, and Public Policy, 2009, On Being a Scientist: A Guide to Responsible Conduct in Research, Third Edition, Nat. Acad. Sci., http://www.nap.edu/catalog.php?record_id=12192
Kohn, A., 1986, False Prophets (Oxford: Basil Blackwell)
LaFollette, M.C., 1996, Stealing into Print: Fraud, Plagiarism, and Misconduct in Scientific Publishing (University of California Press)
Mallon, T., 2001, Stolen Words – The Classic Book on Plagiarism (Orlando: Harcourt)