Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message

Login Alert

Cancel
Log in
×
×
Register
Log In
(0) Cart
Logo for Cambridge Core from Cambridge University Press. Click to return to homepage.
Logo for Cambridge Core from Cambridge University Press. Click to return to homepage.
Cited by
  • Crossref logo 91
  • Google Scholar logo
Crossref Citations
Crossref logo
This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by Crossref.
Welsh, Jennifer M. 2010. Implementing the “Responsibility to Protect”: Where Expectations Meet Reality. Ethics & International Affairs, Vol. 24, Issue. 4, p. 415.
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
Luck, Edward C. 2010. The Responsibility to Protect: Growing Pains or Early Promise?. Ethics & International Affairs, Vol. 24, Issue. 4, p. 349.
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
Bellamy, Alex J. 2011. Libya and the Responsibility to Protect: The Exception and the Norm. Ethics & International Affairs, Vol. 25, Issue. 3, p. 263.
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
Tannam, Etain 2011. The Responsibility to Protect: Normative Strength and Empirical Weakness?. Ethnopolitics, Vol. 10, Issue. 1, p. 133.
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
Weiss, Thomas G. 2011. RtoP Alive and Well after Libya. Ethics & International Affairs, Vol. 25, Issue. 3, p. 287.
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
Dunne, Tim and Gifkins, Jess 2011. Libya and the state of intervention. Australian Journal of International Affairs, Vol. 65, Issue. 5, p. 515.
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
Hurd, Ian 2011. Is Humanitarian Intervention Legal? The Rule of Law in an Incoherent World. Ethics & International Affairs, Vol. 25, Issue. 3, p. 293.
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
Leca, Jean 2011. Political philosophy in political science: sixty years on. International Political Science Review, Vol. 32, Issue. 1, p. 95.
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
Welsh, Jennifer 2011. Civilian Protection in Libya: Putting Coercion and Controversy Back into RtoP. Ethics & International Affairs, Vol. 25, Issue. 3, p. 255.
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
Pattison, James 2011. Introduction. Ethics & International Affairs, Vol. 25, Issue. 3, p. 251.
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
Clemens Jr., Walter C. 2011. Can – Should – Must We Negotiate with Evil?*. Pacific Focus, Vol. 26, Issue. 3, p. 316.
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
Szydełko, Agata 2011. NATO’s Cooperation with Others: A Comprehensive Challenge. Connections: The Quarterly Journal, Vol. 11, Issue. 1, p. 43.
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
Leca, Jean 2012. L'état entre politics, policies et polity. Gouvernement et action publique, Vol. VOL. 1, Issue. 1, p. 59.
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
Piiparinen, Touko 2012. Norm compliance by proximity: explaining the surge of regional actors in responsibility to protect. Conflict, Security & Development, Vol. 12, Issue. 4, p. 387.
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
Begby, Endre Reichberg, Gregory M. and Syse, Henrik 2012. The Ethics of War. Part II: Contemporary Authors and Issues. Philosophy Compass, Vol. 7, Issue. 5, p. 328.
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
Ouali, Abdelhamid El 2012. Territorial Integrity in a Globalizing World. p. 167.
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
Morris, Justin and Wheeler, Nicholas 2012. The Withering of the Welfare State. p. 175.
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
Straehle, Christine 2012. Thinking about Protecting the Vulnerable When Thinking about Immigration: Is There a ‘Responsibility to Protect’ in Immigration Regimes?. Journal of International Political Theory, Vol. 8, Issue. 1-2, p. 159.
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
Costas Trascasas, Milena 2012. International Disaster Response Law. p. 221.
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
Twiss, Sumner B. and Chan, Jonathan 2012. CLASSICAL CONFUCIANISM, PUNITIVE EXPEDITIONS, AND HUMANITARIAN INTERVENTION. Journal of Military Ethics, Vol. 11, Issue. 2, p. 81.
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
Download full list
Google Scholar Citations

View all Google Scholar citations for this article.

×
Cambridge University Press

Our Site

  • Accessibility
  • Contact & Help
  • Legal Notices

Our Platforms

  • Cambridge Core
  • Cambridge Open Engage
  • Cambridge Higher Education

Our Products

  • Journals
  • Books
  • Elements
  • Textbooks
  • Courseware

Join us online

Please choose a valid location.

  • Rights & Permissions
  • Copyright
  • Privacy Notice
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies Policy
Cambridge University Press 2025

Cancel
Confirm
×

Save article to Kindle

To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

The Responsibility to Protect—Five Years On
  • Volume 24, Issue 2
  • Alex J. Bellamy
  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-7093.2010.00254.x
Please provide your Kindle email.
Available formats Please select a format to save.
×

Save article to Dropbox

To save this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

The Responsibility to Protect—Five Years On
  • Volume 24, Issue 2
  • Alex J. Bellamy
  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-7093.2010.00254.x
Available formats Please select a format to save.
×

Save article to Google Drive

To save this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

The Responsibility to Protect—Five Years On
  • Volume 24, Issue 2
  • Alex J. Bellamy
  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-7093.2010.00254.x
Available formats Please select a format to save.
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Contents help
Close Contents help

- No HTML tags allowed
- Web page URLs will display as text only
- Lines and paragraphs break automatically
- Attachments, images or tables are not permitted

Please enter your response.

Your details

Email help
Close Email help

Your email address will be used in order to notify you when your comment has been reviewed by the moderator and in case the author(s) of the article or the moderator need to contact you directly.

Please enter a valid email address.
You have entered the maximum number of contributors

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? * Conflicting interests help

Close Conflicting interests help

Please list any fees and grants from, employment by, consultancy for, shared ownership in or any close relationship with, at any time over the preceding 36 months, any organisation whose interests may be affected by the publication of the response. Please also list any non-financial associations or interests (personal, professional, political, institutional, religious or other) that a reasonable reader would want to know about in relation to the submitted work. This pertains to all the authors of the piece, their spouses or partners.